Search

OBJECTIVE: To contextualize the use of methodological tools and report the experiences with the course "Assessment and Prescription of Physical Activity for Health and Disease" ministered for professionals/residents in Physical Education (PE). METHODS: The article presents the descriptions of activities developed for two professionals of the first class from the multidisciplinary residence of the Midwestern Parana State University (Unicentro-PR). We aimed to innovate in teaching aspects, using methodological references such as evidence-based physical activity and program-based learning. RESULTS: There are some highlighted experiences such as the importance of searching for the theoretical reference and the timing to apply the topics, optimizing the application of science in the residences' practice and the pragmatic trials stimulating evidences that reflects practices. CONCLUSION: We hope this report provides the continuous discussion on multidisciplinary residence courses about the optimization of science applied into practice by PE professionals in the primary health care context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To elaborate on a rapid review model that can be useful for undergraduate thesis projects (TCC) in Physical Education courses, and for approximate science and professional practice. METHODS: We described the adaptations performed in order to come up with an alternative method to develop rapid reviews in fourth year projects at the undergraduate level. RESULTS: A student and professor presented extracted data from the studies, the student provided initial opinion and final synthesis and, finally, critical appraisal of the committee and researcher with expertise in knowledge translation about the developed method were included. CONCLUSION: We expect that this report will promote discussion on the topic about the supervision of fourth year research projects in Physical Education, with emphasis on Physical Activity and Health and offers a way to bridge the gap between scientific evidence and practices through actions directed at to future professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To elaborate on a rapid review model that can be useful for undergraduate thesis projects (TCC) in Physical Education courses, and for approximate science and professional practice. METHODS: We described the adaptations performed in order to come up with an alternative method to develop rapid reviews in fourth year projects at the undergraduate level. RESULTS: A student and professor presented extracted data from the studies, the student provided initial opinion and final synthesis and, finally, critical appraisal of the committee and researcher with expertise in knowledge translation about the developed method were included. CONCLUSION: We expect that this report will promote discussion on the topic about the supervision of fourth year research projects in Physical Education, with emphasis on Physical Activity and Health and offers a way to bridge the gap between scientific evidence and practices through actions directed at to future professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]