Search

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Sociology is the property of Canadian Journal of Sociology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Sociology is the property of Canadian Journal of Sociology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In a recent CJS special issue developed around their paper titled “The Institutionalization of Symbolic Interactionism in Canadian Sociology, 1922-1979: Success at What Cost?” Helmes-Hayes and Milne (2017) document the emergence and establishment of symbolic interactionism (SI) in English-language Canadian sociology, and then consider its fragmentation and decline from 1979 into the present period. This is followed by commentaries from Jacqueline Low (2017), who gives a more optimistic impression of the present state of SI in Canada, and Neil McLaughlin (2017), who considers its sectarian nature as a social and intellectual movement. This is a worthy discussion in the history of Canadian sociology and the sociology of ideas. Certainly Canadian SI is an important part of our wider national sociology tradition, and it is important that we recognize its past, present, and future institutional development in light of as much evidence as possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Sociology is the property of Canadian Journal of Sociology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article deals with the state of sociology in Canada. A review of the history of the discipline of sociology in this country leads to the almost inescapable conclusion that what has developed here is not a Canadian sociology but a sociology that is American. Not only have Canadian universities recruited their sociology staffs largely from the United States, but most of the Canadians we have had teaching sociology in this country have acquired their training across the border. If one attempted to trace the early development of sociological teaching and research in Canada there might be reason to argue that in its origins the discipline had something of a Canadian or, at least, a non-American character. They were not Americans in those days before the First World War or immediately after teaching sociology or attempting to apply its teachings to the affairs of the community. There is much that could be said about the accomplishments of Canadian sociology, particularly as it is coming to be developed by younger scholars in the field.

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Sociology is the property of Canadian Journal of Sociology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Sociology is the property of Canadian Journal of Sociology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article presents a survey of English language Canadian sociology beginning in the early 20th century when it first appeared in universities. It draws on the work of Canadian sociologist Michael Burawoy to give context to contemporary public sociology in Canada. It also discusses various published reports within the issue including one by Gillian Creese, Arlene Tigar McLaren and Jane Pulkingham that examines feminist sociology in Canada, one by Robert Brym and Reza Nakhaie that offers a survey of the academics pursuing public sociology in Canada and one by Avi Goldberg and Axel van den Berg that explores social movements in Canada.

The article discusses various published reports within the issue, including one by Jean-Philippe Warren that examines the history of sociology in Quebec, Canada, one by Rick Helmes-Hayes that explores the New Liberal Sociology of the 1950s and 1960s and one by Robert Brym and Reza Nakhaie that examines the academics that make up Canada's social sciences.

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Sociology is the property of Canadian Journal of Sociology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)