Search

Background: Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) chemotherapy increases the risk of life‐threatening complications, including septic shock (SS). An area‐based measure of social determinants of health, the social disorganization index (SDI), was hypothesized to be associated with SS and SS‐associated death (SS‐death). Methods: Children treated for de novo AML on two Children's Oncology Group trials at institutions contributing to the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database were included. The SDI was calculated via residential zip code data from the US Census Bureau. SS was identified via PHIS resource utilization codes. SS‐death was defined as death within 2 weeks of an antecedent SS event. Patients were followed from 7 days after the start of chemotherapy until the first of end of front‐line therapy, death, relapse, or removal from study. Multivariable‐adjusted Cox regressions estimated hazard ratios (HRs) comparing time to first SS by SDI group. Results: The assembled cohort included 700 patients, with 207 (29.6%) sustaining at least one SS event. There were 233 (33%) in the SDI‐5 group (highest disorganization). Adjusted time to incident SS did not statistically significantly differ by SDI (reference, SDI‐1; SDI‐2: HR, 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51–1.41]; SDI‐3: HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.42–1.16]; SDI‐4: HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.61–1.53]; SDI‐5: HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.45–1.14]). Nine patients (4.4%) with SS experienced SS‐death; seven of these patients (78%) were in SDI‐4 or SDI‐5. Conclusions: In a large, nationally representative cohort of trial‐enrolled pediatric patients with AML, there was no significant association between the SDI and time to SS. Time to first septic shock event was not associated with the social disorganization index (SDI), an area‐based measure of social determination of health, in children with acute myeloid leukemia treated on two Children's Oncology Group trials. Septic shock–associated mortality is rare in children with acute myeloid leukemia, and differences by SDI were not able to be detected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite the widespread implementation of telemedicine, there are limited data regarding its impact on key components of care for patients with incurable or high‐risk cancer. For these patients, high‐quality care requires detailed conversations regarding treatment priorities (advance care planning) and clinical care to minimize unnecessary acute care (unplanned hospitalizations). Whether telemedicine affects these outcomes relative to in‐person clinic visits was examined among patients with cancer at high risk for 6‐month mortality. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with cancer with any tumor type treated at the University of Pennsylvania who were newly identified between April 1 and December 31, 2020, to be at high risk for 6‐month mortality via a validated machine learning algorithm. Separate modified Poisson regressions were used to assess the occurrence of advance care planning and unplanned hospitalizations for telemedicine as compared to in‐person visits. Additional analyses were done comparing telemedicine type (video or phone) as compared to in‐person clinic visits. Results: The occurrence of advance care planning was similar between telemedicine and in‐person visits (6.8% vs. 6.0%; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.25; 95% CI, 0.92–1.69). In regard to telemedicine subtype, patients exposed to video encounters were modestly more likely to have documented advance care planning in comparison to those seen in person (7.5% vs. 6.0%; aRR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.03–2.11). The 3‐month risk for unplanned hospitalization was comparable for telemedicine compared to in‐person clinic encounters (21% vs. 18%; aRR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.81–1.38). Conclusions: In this study, care delivered by telemedicine, compared to in‐person clinic visits, produced comparable rates of advance care planning conversations without increasing hospitalizations, which suggests that vulnerable patients can be managed safely by telemedicine. In this study, care delivered by telemedicine, compared to in‐person clinic visits, produced comparable rates of advance care planning conversations without increasing hospitalizations, which suggests that vulnerable patients can be managed safely by telemedicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Timely targeted treatment initiation can be challenging because additional biomarker testing is needed for eligibility. The authors hypothesized that timely targeted treatment improves survival relative to nontimely initiation in metastatic HER2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). Methods: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of metastatic HER2+ GEA treated with first‐line (1L) systemic therapy from January 2011 to December 2017 using a nationwide electronic health record–derived deidentified database. Timely targeted treatment—trastuzumab initiation within 14 days after starting 1L chemotherapy—was assessed as a time‐varying exposure. Nontimely targeted treatment included patients who initiated trastuzumab after 14 days or who lacked documentation of receiving trastuzumab. Extended Cox regressions compared overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) between timely and nontimely groups. Results: A total of 320 patients were included; 59.1% received timely trastuzumab. Relative to nontimely initiation, timely trastuzumab was associated with significantly higher OS (2‐year OS, 32.1% vs 15.3%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51‐0.88) and PFS (2‐year PFS, 9.2% vs 3.7%; adjusted HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55‐0.93). Results remained similar in sensitivity analyses 1) using alternative "timeliness" definitions up to 70 days after starting 1L chemotherapy, 2) comparing any trastuzumab, regardless of timing of initiation, to no trastuzumab, and 3) excluding patients lacking documentation of receiving trastuzumab. Conclusions: Improved survival was observed among metastatic HER2+ GEA patients treated with trastuzumab versus those who were not, regardless of timing of initiation. Although these results reassure clinicians that modest targeted treatment delays may not be detrimental to outcomes, efforts should still ensure that all metastatic HER2+ GEA patients receive trastuzumab. Time‐to‐treatment initiation is an important quality metric in oncology, but there is a paucity of data on the impact of timely targeted treatment for which additional biomarker testing is needed to identify eligible patients. In this study of patients with metastatic HER2‐overexpressing gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, overall and progression‐free survival rates were higher for patients treated with trastuzumab compared to those who were not, regardless of the timing of initiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Anti human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (anti‐HER2) therapy with trastuzumab improves overall survival in patients with advanced, HER2‐positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) and is now incorporated into national guidelines. However, little is known about adherence to and determinants of timely HER2 testing and trastuzumab initiation in routine practice. METHODS: The authors performed a cross‐sectional study of patients who had advanced GEA diagnosed between January 2011 and June 2019 in a nationwide electronic health record‐derived database. The annual prevalences of both timely HER2 testing (defined within 21 days after advanced diagnosis) and timely trastuzumab initiation (defined within 14 days after a positive HER2 result) were calculated. Log‐binomial regressions estimated adjusted prevalence ratios comparing timely HER2 testing and trastuzumab initiation by patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS: In total, the cohort included 6032 patients with advanced GEA of whom 1007 were HER2‐positive. Between 2011 and 2019, timely HER2 testing increased from 22.4% to 44.5%, whereas timely trastuzumab initiation remained stable at 16.3%. No appreciable differences in timely testing or trastuzumab initiation were noted by age, sex, race, or insurance status. Compared with patients who had metastatic disease at diagnosis, patients who had early stage GEA who did not undergo surgery were less likely to receive timely HER2 testing and trastuzumab initiation (testing prevalence ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.64‐0.75; treatment prevalence ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18‐0.56), as were patients with early stage disease who subsequently developed a distant recurrence (testing prevalence ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47‐0.65; treatment prevalence ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.24‐1.55). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced GEA, guideline‐recommended HER2 testing and anti‐HER2 therapy remain underused. Uptake may improve with universal HER2 testing regardless of stage. Timely HER2 biomarker testing and targeted therapy administration remain in use for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Compared with patients initially diagnosed with de novo metastatic disease, those diagnosed with early stage disease who develop a recurrence or who do not undergo curative surgery are less likely to receive timely precision oncology care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adolescents with cancer engage in sexual behaviors and are exposed to teratogenic chemotherapy. There are no data regarding pregnancy screening patterns for adolescents before chemotherapy exposure.Methods: A cross-sectional study of leukemia and emergency room (ER) admissions in the Pediatric Health Information System from 1999 to 2011 was conducted. Females who were 10 to 18 years old and 1) had newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or 2) had ER visits with computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen/pelvis were included. The exposure was a hospital visit with either chemotherapy or an abdominal/pelvic CT scan. The main outcome was a pregnancy test billed on the same day or before the teratogenic exposure within the same index admission. Log-binomial regressions were used to compute prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals comparing pregnancy screening in the leukemia and ER cohorts.Results: A total of 35,650 admissions were identified. The proportion of visits with an appropriately timed pregnancy test was 35%, 64%, and 58% in the ALL (n = 889), AML (n = 127), and ER cohorts (n = 34,634), respectively. Patients with ALL were significantly less likely to have a pregnancy test than the ER cohort (adjusted prevalence ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.78), but there was no significant difference between the AML and ER cohorts (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.27). There was substantial hospital-level variation in pregnancy screening patterns.Conclusions: Adolescents with acute leukemia and ER visits have low rates of pregnancy screening before teratogenic exposures. Standardized practice guidelines for pregnancy screening among adolescents may improve screening rates. Cancer 2016;122:3394-3400. © 2016 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Using patient‐reported outcomes for symptom monitoring in oncology has resulted in significant benefits for adult patients with cancer. The feasibility of this approach has not been established in the routine care of children with cancer. Methods: The Pediatric Patient‐Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (Ped‐PRO‐CTCAE) is an item library that enables children and caregivers to self‐report symptoms. Ten symptom items from the Ped‐PRO‐CTCAE were uploaded to an online platform. Patients at least 7 years old and their caregivers were prompted by text/email message to electronically self‐report daily during a planned hospitalization for chemotherapy administration. Symptom reports were emailed to the clinical team caring for the patient, but no instructions were given regarding the use of this information. Rates of patient participation and clinician responses to reports were systematically tracked. Results: The median age of the participating patients (n = 52) was 11 years (range, 7‐18 years). All patients and caregivers completed an initial login, with 92% of dyads completing at least 1 additional symptom assessment during hospitalization (median, 3 assessments; range, 0‐40). Eighty‐one percent of participating dyads submitted symptom reports on at least half of hospital days, and 54% submitted reports on all hospital days. Clinical actions were taken in response to symptom reports 21% of the time. Most patients felt that the system was easy (73%) and important (79%). Most clinicians found symptom reports easy to understand and useful (97%). Conclusions: Symptom monitoring using patient‐reported outcome measures for hospitalized pediatric oncology patients is feasible and generates data valued by clinicians and patients. Patient‐ and caregiver‐reported symptom monitoring is feasible for children hospitalized for chemotherapy, and clinicians are willing to use patient‐reported symptom data to make clinical decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) determine induction regimen standards. However, these studies lack the data necessary to evaluate mortality trends over time and differences in resource utilization between induction regimens. Moreover, these trials likely underreport the clinical toxicities experienced by patients. METHODS: The Pediatric Health Information System database was used to identify children treated for presumed de novo AML between 1999 and 2010. Induction mortality, risk factors for induction mortality, and resource utilization by induction regimen were estimated using standard frequentist statistics, logistic regression, and Poisson regression, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 1686 patients were identified with an overall induction case fatality rate of 5.4% that decreased from 9.8% in 2003 to 2.1% in 2009 ( P = .0023). The case fatality rate was 9.0% in the intensively timed DCTER (dexamethasone, cytarabine, thioguanine, etoposide, and rubidomycin [daunomycin]/idarubicin) induction and 3.8% for ADE (cytarabine, daunomycin, and etoposide) induction (adjusted odds ratio = 2.2, 95% confidence interval = 1.1-4.5). Patients treated with intensively timed DCTER regimens had significantly greater antibiotic, red cell/platelet transfusion, analgesic, vasopressor, renal replacement therapy, and radiographic resource utilization than patients treated with ADE regimens. Resource utilization was substantially higher than reported in published pediatric AML clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Induction mortality for children with AML decreased significantly as ADE use increased. In addition to higher associated mortality, intensively timed DCTER regimens had a correspondingly higher use of health care resources. Using resource utilization data as a proxy for adverse events, adverse event rates reported on clinical trials substantially underestimated the clinical toxicities of all pediatric AML induction regimens. Cancer 2013. © 2013 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]