Search

Background: Sirolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor. Metformin may potentiate mTOR inhibition by sirolimus while mitigating its adverse effects. We conducted a pilot study to test this hypothesis., Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumor were treated with sirolimus for 7 days followed by randomization to either sirolimus with metformin (Arm A) or sirolimus (Arm B) until day 21. From day 22 onwards, all patients received sirolimus and metformin. The primary aim was to compare the change in phospho-p70S6K (pp70S6K) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from day 8 to day 22 using a two-sample t test. Secondary aims were objective response rate, toxicity, and other serum pharmacodynamic biomarkers (e.g., fasting glucose, triglycerides, insulin, C-peptide, IGF-1, IGF-1R, IGF-BP, and leptin)., Results: 24 patients were enrolled, with 18 evaluable for the primary endpoint. There was no significant difference in mean change in pp70S6K in arm A vs. arm B (- 0.12 vs. - 0.16; P = 0.64). Similarly, there were no significant differences in other serum pharmacodynamic biomarkers. There were no partial responses. There were no dose-limiting or unexpected toxicities., Conclusions: Adding metformin to sirolimus, although well tolerated, was not associated with significant changes in pp70S6K in PBMC or other serum pharmacodynamic biomarkers., Impact: Combining metformin with sirolimus did not improve mTOR inhibition.

Purpose: Etoposide is a widely used cytotoxic drug that is commercially available in both intravenous and oral formulations. High interpatient pharmacokinetic variability has been associated with oral etoposide administration. Various strategies used in the past to reduce such variability have not been successful. Hence, this study was designed to evaluate if pharmacokinetic modulation of oral etoposide with ketoconazole could lead to a favorable alteration of etoposide pharmacokinetics, and to assess the feasibility and safety of this approach., Methods: Thirty-two patients were treated with ketoconazole 200 mg daily with an escalating dose of oral etoposide starting at a dose of 50 mg every other day. Pharmacokinetic samples were obtained during the first treatment cycle after the administration of an oral etoposide and ketoconazole dose. Additional baseline pharmacokinetic studies of etoposide alone were performed 4 days prior to the first treatment cycle., Results: Dose limiting toxicities were neutropenia and fatigue. Ketoconazole increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of oral etoposide by a median of 20% (p < 0.005). Ketoconazole did not reduce the interpatient variability in etoposide pharmacokinetics. Pretreatment bilirubin levels correlated with etoposide clearance (Spearman's r = -0.48, p = 0.008). The maximum tolerated dose was etoposide administered at 50 mg daily and ketoconazole 200 mg qd for 3 of 5 weeks., Conclusions: Ketoconazole reduces the apparent clearance of oral etoposide, does not alter its toxicity profile and does not reduce interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. Other methods to reduce the pharmacokinetic variability of oral etoposide are needed.

Purpose: Carboxyamidotriazole (CAI) is a novel antineoplastic agent in clinical development with limited oral bioavailability. In vitro, ketoconazole has been demonstrated to inhibit CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of CAI. We performed this phase I trial to determine if ketoconazole-mediated CYP3A4 inhibition would lead to favorable alteration of CAI pharmacokinetics, and to evaluate the safety, toxicity and tolerability of the proposed combination., Design: Forty-seven patients were treated using a standard three patients per cohort CAI dose-escalation scheme. In cycle 1, CAI was administered alone on day-6 followed by a single dose of ketoconazole (200 mg) on day 0. CAI and ketoconazole (200 mg/day) were subsequently coadministered on days 1 and 3-28. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained following the doses on days-6 and 1. All subsequent cycles were of 28-day duration, and consisted of daily CAI and ketoconazole coadministration., Results: Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on samples from 44 patients. In most patients administration of ketoconazole produced an increase in CAI AUC and Cmax with a decrease in CAI clearance. Seven patients experienced stable disease for up to 12 months. Gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicities were the most common toxicities., Conclusions: Coadministration of CAI with ketoconazole increased CAI exposure in most of the patients without altering the toxicity profile of CAI. The highest CAI dose administered on the trial was 300 mg/day. The clinical utility of such a modulation strategy might be explored in future clinical trials of CAI.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of pentostatin in renally impaired patients in order to establish dosing guidelines for this population., Methods: Pentostatin doses were administered as 15-min intravenous infusions to patients based on their measured creatinine clearance (CLcr) as follows. Patients with normal renal function (NRF), defined as CLcr >60 ml/min, received 4 mg/m(2) repeated every14 days. Patients with impaired renal function (IRF) included those with CLcr 41-60 ml/min who received 3 mg/m(2) and those with CLcr 21-40 ml/min who received 2 mg/m(2), also repeated every 14 days. Heparinized plasma samples were collected during drug infusion and out through 96 h after dosing, except in two patients in whom sampling was extended to 144 h after dosing. Urine sampling extended to 96 h after dosing, and all samples were analyzed by a validated enzyme immunoassay for pentostatin concentrations., Results: Enrolled in the study were 13 patients (7 IRF and 6 NRF), of whom 12 contributed samples for pharmacokinetic analysis. Median baseline CLcr values were 71.5 ml/min for NRF patients and 44 ml/min for IRF patients. Following the end of intravenous infusion, pentostatin plasma concentrations declined biexponentially with time. In some patients there was a transient increase in pentostatin equivalents 2 to 4 h after dosing. There was a good correlation between measured CLcr and pentostatin total plasma clearance. The AUC(0- infinity ) values seen in IRF patients, at lower doses, were within the range of the AUC(0- infinity ) values seen in patients with normal CLcr. Toxicities observed in the two groups of patients were similar., Conclusions: The pentostatin doses used in the study appear to be appropriate for administration to cancer patients with varying degrees of renal impairment.

Aims: To determine the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluoruracil (5-FU) taken orally with eniluracil and to compare the performance of different pharmacokinetic analysis methods in the detection a potential food-drug interaction., Methods: In a randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study, 12 patients received eniluracil (50 mg, orally) on days 1 and 2 and 5-FU (20 mg/m(2), orally) on day 2 following either a 2-h fast or 20 min after a standard meal. Treatments were separated by 7 days. Timed blood samples were collected during the first two treatment periods and 5-FU concentrations determined by GC/MS. Data were analyzed and pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were obtained using a noncompartmental, two-stage and population analysis methods., Results: In fasted individuals, the clearance/bioavailability of 5-FU was estimated to be 5.6 l/h. The mean absorption lag-time was 0.24 h and was followed by rapid absorption of 5-FU. Administration of 5-FU and eniluracil with food resulted in a decrease in the 5-FU absorption rate constant by 90%. As a result, the peak plasma concentration (C(max)) of 5-FU was decreased by 21% and the time to C(max) was increased 2.9-fold. Clearance of 5-FU, relative bioavailability, and area under the plasma concentration vs time curve (AUC) remained unchanged with coadministration of food. Similar results were obtained using all three data analysis methods., Conclusions: Administration of food with oral 5-FU and eniluracil slowed absorption of 5-FU and decreased 5-FU C(max), but did not effect AUC. Further investigation of the incorporation of population pharmacokinetic approaches in food effect studies is warranted.

In previous phase I reports of short bolus infusion of rhizoxin, problems in assay sensitivity prevented the description of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships, and a pharmacologically guided approach to dose escalation was deemed not feasible. In this report, we describe a mathematical model, which explains the schedule-dependent interpatient pharmacodynamic variability of rhizoxin administered on a continuous infusion schedule. Using patient demographic and toxicity data from 45 patients treated in a phase I dose and duration escalation study of rhizoxin, we sought to model the nadir neutrophil count. We hypothesized that a surrogate derived variable based on dose and duration would reflect a pharmacokinetic parameter that would be a significant covariate. Multiple linear regression analysis was carried out to determine the other significant covariates. Dose/m2 x Log(DUR/ALB) was significantly correlated with the LogANCnadir (Log10 neutrophil nadir; r = 0.56, P < 0.001). Other significant covariates included baseline performance status (PS), baseline serum bilirubin (BIL), and Log10 baseline neutrophil count (LogANCbaseline). Model bias and precision were assessed using the mean prediction error (MPE) and the root mean square error (RMSE) of the ANCnadir, respectively. We constructed 1-4 covariate models. The variability of ANCnadir was modeled with good precision and accuracy with a 4-covariate model (MPE and RMSE 0.113 +/- 0.182 x 10(3) cells/microl and 1.22 x 10(3) cells/microl, respectively). This model should be validated and improved on with further clinical data. We believe that such pharmacodynamic modeling should be explored further to determine its performance and clinical relevance compared with modeling using pharmacokinetic parameters.

Purpose: To determine the feasibility, maximal tolerated doses, and response rates for a combined regimen of the platinum and 5-fluorouracil oral analogues bis-acetato-ammine-dichloro-cyclohexyl-amine platinum(IV) (JM-216) and uracil/ftorafur (UFT) coadministered as a 14 consecutive-day every 28-day schedule., Methods: Of 20 patients enrolled in this investigation, 17 on the following dose escalation scheme were evaluable for toxicity and/or response: I UFT 300 mg/day, JM-216 5 mg/day (three patients), II UFT 300 mg/day, JM-216 10 mg/day (four patients), III UFT 300 mg/day, JM-216 20 mg/day (ten patients)., Results: All 17 evaluable patients were evaluable for toxicity. At dose level III dose-limiting nausea and emesis were observed in one patient despite maximal antiemetic support. Importantly, neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity were not observed at the JM-216 dose levels examined in this study. This observation is consistent with results seen with single agent JM-216., Conclusion: For JM-216 and UFT administered at 20 mg/day and 300 mg/day over 14 days, nausea and emesis were observed as the principal dose-limiting toxicities. These doses are considerably below the maximally tolerated doses of single agent JM-216 and UFT. Shorter administration schedules should be explored in an attempt to increase the dose intensity and minimize the toxicity of this combination oral regimen.

Purpose: 9-Aminocamptothecin (9-AC) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor with high antitumor activity but poor solubility in conventional vehicles. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the toxicities and pharmacokinetics of a colloidal dispersion (CD) formulation of 9-AC when administered orally on a 5 days per week every 2 weeks schedule., Method: This formulation, which was developed for intravenous administration, was orally administered in 20 ml orange juice. A group of 16 cancer patients were treated at doses of 0.2-0.68 mg/m2 daily., Results: Grade 1-2 nausea (n = 9) was common, usually occurring during the last 2 days of dosing. No objective responses or cumulative toxicities were observed. Pharmacokinetic analysis of total 9-AC showed highly variable apparent oral 9-AC clearance and half-life. There was marked interpatient variability at each dose level in the 9-AC AUC and Cmax, and these parameters showed a poor correlation with dose (r2 = 0.07 and 0.38, respectively)., Conclusions: We conclude that this formulation is not suitable for further clinical development because of poor bioavailability and highly variable and/or saturable absorption or elimination. Another formulation developed for oral administration is under study elsewhere.

Unlabelled: A combination of oral 13-cis-retinoic acid (cis-RA) and subcutaneous interferon alfa-2a (IFN) has been reported to yield high response rates in patients with squamous cell carcinomas (SCCAs) of the cervix and skin. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin (5-FU/LV) are chemotherapeutic agents commonly used for SCCAs., Purpose: To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of cisplatin and 5-FU/LV when combined with IFN and cis-RA, and to define a recommended phase II regimen for testing in cervical cancer and other appropriate tumor types., Methods: Phase I cohort design. Cisplatin was administered every 3 weeks. 5-FU and LV were administered together as a weekly 24-h infusion. Cis-RA was given orally twice daily. IFN was initially given subcutaneously at a dose of 3 million units (MU) daily., Results: A total of 31 patients were treated. The IFN dose was reduced to 3 MU three times weekly because of patient intolerance. Cytopenias prevented the administration of weekly 5-FU/LV. Single-agent cisplatin with three times weekly IFN and twice daily cis-RA was tolerable. Four partial responses were observed, in patients with adrenal cancer, bladder cancer, gastric cancer, and adenocarcinoma of unknown primary., Conclusions: The recommended phase II regimen is cisplatin 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, IFN 3 MU three times weekly, and cis-RA 1 mg/kg daily. This appears to be more toxic than single-agent cisplatin, but the preliminary activity observed warrants further testing.

It has been reported that cancer patients with diabetes mellitus receiving a continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have more toxicity and higher plasma 5-FU levels that patients without diabetes mellitus. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the initial and rate-limiting enzyme in the catabolism of 5-FU. DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells has been reported to correlate inversely with 5-FU plasma levels in patients. We therefore undertook a study to compare the activity of DPD in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of human subjects with and without diabetes mellitus. The study groups comprised 43 volunteers with and 39 without diabetes mellitus, and peripheral blood mononuclear cell DPD activity was assayed on samples obtained between 8 a.m. and 11 a.m. DPD activity was not decreased in diabetic subjects. There was no relationship between DPD activity and gender body mass index, or race. There was a modest correlation between DPD activity and age (r=0.19, P =0.08). We conclude that increases in 5-FU-related toxicities in diabetics must be related to factors other than peripheral blood mononuclear cell DPD activity.

We evaluated the multidrug resistance (MDR)-modulating effects of progesterone (PRG) and an orally active, structurally related compound, megestrol acetate (MA), in several MDR human cell lines. At 100 microM, both steroids inhibited the binding of a Vinca alkaloid photoaffinity analog to P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in MDR human neuroblastic SH-SY5Y/VCR cells [which show greater than 1500-fold resistance to vincristine (VCR) in the tetrazolium dye (MTT) assay]. However, 100 microM MA markedly enhanced the binding of [3H]-azidopine to P-gp in both SH-SY5Y/VCR cells and the MDR human epidermoid KB-GSV2 cell line (which displays 250-fold resistance to VCR in the MTT assay). PRG had little effect on the binding of [3H]-azidopine to P-gp. MA at low doses was more effective than PRG in sensitizing cells to VCR and enhancing their accumulation of [3H]-VCR. The highly resistant SH-SY5Y/VCR subline exhibited significant collateral sensitivity to both steroids. These data suggest that MA may be a clinically useful modulator of MDR.

We conducted a double-blind, randomized crossover study to compare the toxicity and antiemetic efficacy of the 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonist batanopride with that of metoclopramide in 21 chemotherapy-naive patients receiving at least 70 mg/m2 cisplatin. The study was terminated when hypotension was observed following the infusion of batanopride at other institutions testing similar drug schedules. Although we observed no hypotension following treatment with batanopride in this trial, we did note asymptomatic prolongation of the corrected QT interval (QTc), PR interval, and QRS complex on the EKG in the batanopride arm. Of 15 evaluable patients, 8 experienced less than or equal to 2 episodes of emesis within 24 h of the first batanopride infusion, whereas 9/15 subjects experienced less than or equal to 2 emetic episodes following the administration of metoclopramide. Overall, the evidence suggests that this dosing schedule for batanopride may be too toxic for clinical use.