Search

Abstract The 2023 update of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on standardizing cancer diagnosis and treatment in China, reflecting the latest advancements in evidence‐based medicine, healthcare resource availability, and precision medicine. These updates address the differences in epidemiological characteristics, clinicopathological features, tumor biology, treatment patterns, and drug selections between Eastern and Western gastric cancer patients. Key revisions include a structured template for imaging diagnosis reports, updated standards for molecular marker testing in pathological diagnosis, and an elevated recommendation for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III gastric cancer. For advanced metastatic gastric cancer, the guidelines introduce new recommendations for immunotherapy, anti‐angiogenic therapy and targeted drugs, along with updated management strategies for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive and deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability‐high (MSI‐H) patients. Additionally, the guidelines offer detailed screening recommendations for hereditary gastric cancer and an appendix listing drug treatment regimens for various stages of gastric cancer. The 2023 CSCO Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer updates are based on both Chinese and international clinical research and expert consensus to enhance their applicability and relevance in clinical practice, particularly in the heterogeneous healthcare landscape of China, while maintaining a commitment to scientific rigor, impartiality, and timely revisions.

Abstract There exist differences in the epidemiological characteristics, clinicopathological features, tumor biological characteristics, treatment patterns, and drug selections between gastric cancer patients from the Eastern and Western countries. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) has organized a panel of senior experts specializing in all sub‐specialties of gastric cancer to compile a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer since 2016 and renews it annually. Taking into account regional differences, giving full consideration to the accessibility of diagnosis and treatment resources, these experts have conducted expert consensus judgment on relevant evidence and made various grades of recommendations for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer to reflect the value of cancer treatment and meeting health economic indexes in China. The 2021 CSCO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer covers the diagnosis, treatment, follow‐up, and screening of gastric cancer. Based on the 2020 version of the CSCO Chinese Gastric Cancer guidelines, this updated guideline integrates the results of major clinical studies from China and overseas for the past year, focused on the inclusion of research data from the Chinese population for more personalized and clinically relevant recommendations. For the comprehensive treatment of non‐metastatic gastric cancer, attentions were paid to neoadjuvant treatment. The value of perioperative chemotherapy is gradually becoming clearer and its recommendation level has been updated. For the comprehensive treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, recommendations for immunotherapy were included, and immune checkpoint inhibitors from third‐line to the first‐line of treatment for different patient groups with detailed notes are provided.

Abstract Background Several programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1)/programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) antibodies have been approved for cancer treatment worldwide. Their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics have been reported mainly in western countries, but related data in Chinese patients are limited. This study was conducted to investigate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of an anti‐PD‐1 antibody, toripalimab, in Chinese patients. Methods A single‐center phase I study was conducted in Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center. Eligible patients were adults with histologically confirmed, treatment‐refractory, advanced, solitary malignant tumors. Toripalimab was intravenously infused every 2 weeks in dose‐escalating cohorts at 0.3 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, and 240 mg. The study followed standard 3 + 3 design. Results Between 15th March 2016 and 27th September 2016, 25 patients were enrolled, of whom 3 (12.0%), 7 (28.0%), 6 (24.0%), 6 (24.0%), 3 (12.0%) received 0.3 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, and 240 mg toripalimab, respectively. After a median follow‐up time of 5.0 months (range: 1.5‐19.8 months), we observed that the commonest treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) were fatigue (64.0%) and rash (24.0%). No grade 3 or higher TRAEs were observed. No dose‐limiting toxicity, treatment‐related serious adverse events (SAEs), or treatment‐related death occurred. Objective response rate was 12.5%. The half‐life of toripalimab was 150‐222 h after a single dose infusion. Most patients, including those from the 0.3 mg/kg group, maintained complete PD‐1 receptor occupancy (> 80%) on activated T cells since receiving the first dose of toripalimab. Conclusions Toripalimab is a promising anti‐PD‐1 antibody, which was well tolerated and demonstrated anti‐tumor activity in treatment‐refractory advanced solitary malignant tumors. Further exploration in various tumors and combination therapies is warranted.