1. Moray micro forceps biopsy improves the diagnosis of specific pancreatic cysts.
- Author
-
Zhang ML, Arpin RN, Brugge WR, Forcione DG, Basar O, and Pitman MB
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cystadenoma, Serous surgery, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Cyst surgery, Pancreatic Neoplasms surgery, Prognosis, Cystadenoma, Serous diagnosis, Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration instrumentation, Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration methods, Pancreatic Cyst diagnosis, Pancreatic Neoplasms diagnosis, Surgical Instruments
- Abstract
Background: Making a specific diagnosis of pancreatic cysts preoperatively is difficult. The new disposable Moray micro forceps biopsy (MFB) device allows tissue sampling from the pancreatic cyst wall/septum and aims to improve diagnosis. This study compares the diagnostic performance of the MFB with the current conventional analysis of pancreatic cyst fluid (PCF)., Methods: A total of 48 patients sampled with MFB were identified. Cysts were classified as mucinous on PCF based on extracellular mucin/mucinous epithelium, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels ≥192 ng/mL, or KRAS/GNAS mutation. A diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm was supported by GNAS mutation; a diagnosis of serous cystadenoma was supported by Von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor (VHL) mutation. A diagnosis of mucinous cystic neoplasm required the presence of subepithelial ovarian-type stroma. A high-risk cyst was defined as a mucinous cyst with high-grade dysplasia or an adenocarcinoma. Comparisons in diagnostic performance between PCF and MFB were made., Results: The mean age of the patients was 69.6 years (range, 27-90 years); 25 of 48 patients (52.1%) were female. Cysts were in the pancreatic head (13 patients), neck (2 patients), body (20 patients), and tail (13 patients), averaging 3.1 cm (range, 1.2-6.0 cm). There was concordance with mucinous versus nonmucinous classification (60.4% for PCF vs 58.3% for MFB; P = .949). Three high-risk cysts were detected by PCF and 2 were detected by MFB (P = .670). However, MFB diagnosed significantly more specific cysts compared with PCF (50.0% for MFB vs 18.8% for PCF; P<.001)., Conclusions: PCF analysis and MFB have comparable performance in distinguishing between mucinous and nonmucinous cysts and for detecting high-risk cysts. However, MFB was found to be superior for diagnosing specific cyst subtypes, thus adding significant value to preoperative patient management. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:414-20. © 2018 American Cancer Society., (© 2018 American Cancer Society.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF