Search

Background: Identifying high-grade features in patients with pancreatic mucinous neoplasms (MNs) is important for patient management. The reproducibility of MN cytology grading has been evaluated to a limited extent. In the current study, the authors evaluated interobserver variability in grading MNs and the identification of neoplastic mucin in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens., Methods: A 54-case grading set was created from histologically confirmed MNs (44 MNs) and nonmucinous lesions with abundant gastrointestinal contamination (10 nonmucinous lesions). Six observers received a tutorial, reviewed prescreened slides, and recorded: 1) a diagnosis according to a 6-tiered system (TS) (nondiagnostic, atypical [ATP], mucinous cyst low grade [MCLG], mucinous cyst high grade, suspicious for adenocarcinoma, and positive for adenocarcinoma); 2) the cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen diagnosis (CEADX); and 3) the presence of neoplastic musin. Interobserver agreement (IOA) was evaluated by calculation of kappa coefficients (Kappa). Diagnostic accuracy was not evaluated., Results: The IOA was lowest for the 6-TS (Kappa, 0.13; P<.001). The CEADX was available for 18 cases (33%), including 6 of 24 MCLG cases (25%). CEADX modestly improved IOA for combined tiers of the 6-TS with ATP and MCLG as separate categories. The highest IOA was noted with a 3-TS (nondiagnostic, ATP/MCLG, and mucinous cyst high grade/suspicious for adenocarcinoma/positive for adenocarcinoma [Kappa, 0.28; P<.001]) and various 4-TS (Kappa, 0.22-0.23). IOA was found to be low for neoplastic mucin (Kappa = 0.15; P<.001)., Conclusions: In a study using simulated cytology practice, observers demonstrated fair IOA for grading MNs and low IOA for identifying neoplastic mucin. Knowledge of the cyst fluid CEA level was found to modestly improve the IOA for low-grade lesions., (© 2015 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Pancreatic cyst size >3 cm is a worrisome rather than high-risk feature for malignancy based on the 2012 International Guidelines for the management of mucinous cysts. The value of cytology in preoperative evaluation and surgical triage is unclear., Methods: All pancreatic cysts >3 cm resected over a 7-year period were evaluated for clinical, radiologic, and pathologic information. Performance of cytology for the detection of malignancy and surgical triage compared with imaging was assessed., Results: There were 93 histologically confirmed cysts, 52 of which were mucinous and 41 of which were nonmucinous. Of these, 37% were malignant, including 16 nonmucinous malignancies and 18 mucinous cysts (12 with invasive carcinoma, 6 with high-grade dysplasia). Thirty-nine cysts (41% malignant, 59% benign) were not subject to endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) prior to resection (average size, 6.0 cm). Fifty-four were evaluated by EUS-FNA, with 35 available for review (average size, 5.4 cm). Cytology/cyst fluid analysis had the highest specificity (88.9%) compared with imaging, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed the highest sensitivity (100%). MRI had the highest predictive value for mucinous (100%) versus nonmucinous cysts (100%). MRI and EUS were able to predict malignancy from the presence of high-risk imaging features in all cases. Some benign cases also showed high-risk imaging features on MRI (28.6%), computed tomography (32.3%), and EUS (45.8%). Cytology correctly classified 5 of 6 benign cysts with high-risk imaging as benign., Conclusions: Preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cysts >3 cm is warranted, as many are nonmucinous cysts and not high-grade. Cytology is more specific than imaging for the detection of malignancy in cysts >3 cm., (© 2014 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic cysts obtains cyst fluid for cytologic and biochemical analysis, which may determine whether the cyst is mucinous and malignant, contributing to patient management. Despite this added value, EUS-FNA remains controversial in the preoperative assessment of pancreatic cysts. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of EUS-FNA in a cohort of small pancreatic cysts that were benign on imaging studies., Methods: All pancreatic cysts that underwent initial EUS-FNA in 2006 and 2007 were retrospectively analyzed. Ninety-two patients with pancreatic cysts met the inclusion criteria. Patients who had high-risk or worrisome features on imaging studies were excluded. Cytology, histology, and cyst fluid analysis data were collected. The main outcome measurements were radiologic and clinical follow-up as well as cytopathologic and histologic results., Results: EUS-FNA supported a diagnosis of a mucinous cyst in 38 of 92 patients (41%) by carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurement and/or cytology. Cytology demonstrated an absence of high-grade atypia (HGA) in 89 of 92 patients (97%). The mean follow-up was 4.4 years (range, 0-7.7 years), during which 6 cysts were surgically resected and 16 cysts were resampled by at least 1 subsequent EUS-FNA. The overall negative predictive value of cytologic examination for HGA was 99%., Conclusions: EUS-FNA is a screening test that contributes to a triple-negative test for pancreatic cysts--no high-risk stigmata, no worrisome features, and no HGA on cytology--providing a negative predictive value of 99% for conservative management., (© 2013 American Cancer Society.)

Background: The objective of this study was to develop a triage algorithm to optimize diagnostic yield from cytology, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) testing on different components of a single pancreatic cyst fluid specimen. The authors also sought to determine whether cell block supernatant was suitable for CEA and KRAS testing., Methods: Fifty-four pancreatic cysts were triaged according to a volume-dependent protocol to generate fluid (neat and supernatant) and cell block specimens for cytology, comparative CEA, and KRAS testing. Follow-up histology, diagnostic cytology, or a combined clinicopathologic interpretation was recorded as the final diagnosis., Results: There were 26 mucinous cystic lesions and 28 nonmucinous cystic lesions with volumes ranging from 0.3 mL to 55 mL. Testing different components of the specimens (cell block, neat, and/or supernatant) enabled all laboratory investigations to be performed on 50 of 54 cyst fluids (92.6%). Interpretive concordance was observed in 17 of 17 cases (100%) and in 35 of 40 cases (87.5%) that had multiple components tested for CEA and KRAS mutations, respectively. An elevated CEA level (>192 ng/mL) was the most sensitive test for the detection of a mucinous cystic lesion (62.5%) versus KRAS mutation (56%) and "positive" cytology (61.5%). KRAS mutations were identified in 2 of 25 mucinous cystic lesions (8%) in which cytology and CEA levels were not contributory., Conclusions: A volume-based protocol using different components of the specimen was able to optimize diagnostic yield in pancreatic cyst fluids. KRAS mutation testing increased diagnostic yield when combined with cytology and CEA analysis. The current results demonstrated that supernatant is comparable to neat fluid and cell block material for CEA and KRAS testing., (Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.)