Search

Background: Although statin use has been associated with reduced prostate cancer aggressiveness, the impact of race and patient characteristics on this association is not well understood. We examined the association between statin use and prostate cancer aggressiveness in Caucasians (CA) and African Americans (AA) and explored effect modification by health-seeking behaviors associated with statin use. Methods: Of 1,930 cases from The North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project, 344 (18%) were classified as aggressive based on clinical criteria. Utilizing nonaggressive cases as referent, logistic regression was used to examine the association between statin use and prostate cancer aggressiveness, overall and stratified by race. Smoking and prostate cancer screening were examined as effect modifiers of this association. Results: There was an inverse association between statin use and prostate cancer aggressiveness [OR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.56–0.96], with comparable effect estimates in both races. Although not statistically significant, statin use was associated with reduced ORs for aggressive prostate cancer in never-screened men (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.45–1.39), men screened at low/recommended frequency (≤once/year; OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.41–1.06), and men screened at high frequency (>once/year; OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.53–1.15). Inverse associations between statins and aggressive prostate cancer were strongest in never smokers (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25–0.72), attenuated in former smokers (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.59–1.19), and absent in current smokers (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.70–2.64). Conclusions: Statin use was associated with reduced prostate cancer aggressiveness in CA and AAs, with strongest inverse associations in nonsmokers. Impact: Health-seeking behaviors associated with statin use should be considered when examining the impact of statins on prostate cancer aggressiveness. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(4); 670–7. ©2016 AACR.

Background Racial disparities in time-to-treatment exist among cancer patients, with patients of color being more likely to experience treatment delays. Such racial differences in treatment initiation are likely on the causal pathway to inequities in treatment outcomes. Emerging research has documented racial differences in financial burden, but little is known about the contribution of financial burden to disparities in treatment delays. In this study, we evaluated whether financial burden partly accounted for racial disparities in time to treatment initiation among a cohort of cancer survivors. Methods We used cross-sectional data of patients enrolled in the University of North Carolina Health Registry/Cancer Survivorship Cohort (HR/CSC) between 2010 and 2016. The sample for this study was limited to cancer patients and survivors who identified as non-Hispanic White or Black, received a diagnosis for breast, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, or head or neck cancer, and completed a questionnaire at least 30 days following their diagnosis (N=2,123). Time to treatment was measured in number of days from diagnosis to start of first course of treatment, ascertained from the medical record. Initial treatment was either surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, or hormonal therapy, depending on the clinical indication. Financial burden was assessed using the Patient Satisfaction Questionairre-18 on the self-reported satisfaction with the financial aspects of care (>3.5 is satisfied; Citation Format: Wendi Elkins, Olive Mbah, Jeannette T Benson, Laura Farnan, Neda Padilla, Sam Cykert, Bryce B Reeve, Giselle Corbie-Smith, Cleo A. Samuel. Impact of racial differences in financial burden on time to treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2019 Sep 20-23; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl_2):Abstract nr D071.