1. Testosterone Therapy in Relation to Prostate Cancer in a U.S. Commercial Insurance Claims Database
- Author
-
William D. Finkle, Daniel C. Beachler, Lauren E. Parlett, Stephan Lanes, Philip T. Cochetti, Michael B. Cook, and Robert N. Hoover
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Prostate biopsy ,Databases, Factual ,Epidemiology ,Biopsy ,Risk Assessment ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,Prostate cancer ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Testosterone ,Aged ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Hypogonadism ,Incidence ,Confounding ,Prostate ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Middle Aged ,Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors ,medicine.disease ,United States ,Confidence interval ,For-Profit Insurance Plans ,030104 developmental biology ,Prostate cancer screening ,Hird ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Propensity score matching ,business ,Administrative Claims, Healthcare - Abstract
Background: We conducted a study to assess whether testosterone therapy (TT) alters prostate cancer risk using a large U.S. commercial insurance research database. Methods: From the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD), we selected men ages 30 years or greater who were new users of TT during 2007 to 2015. We selected two comparison groups: (i) unexposed (matched 10:1) and (ii) new users of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i). Incident prostate cancer was defined as diagnosis of prostate cancer within 4 weeks following prostate biopsy. Propensity scores and inverse probability of treatment weights were used in Poisson regression models to estimate adjusted incidence rates, incidence rate ratios (IRR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses included stratification by prostate cancer screening, hypogonadism, and follow-up time. Results: The adjusted prostate cancer IRR was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.68–0.86) when comparing TT with the unexposed group and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79–0.91) in comparison with the PDE5i group. Inverse associations between TT and prostate cancer were observed in a majority of subgroup analyses, although in both comparisons estimates generally attenuated with increasing time following initial exposure. Among TT users, duration of exposure was not associated with prostate cancer. Conclusions: Men who received TT did not have a higher rate of prostate cancer compared with the unexposed or PDE5i comparison groups. The inverse association between TT and prostate cancer could be the result of residual confounding, contraindication bias, or undefined biological effect. Impact: This study suggests that limited TT exposure does not increase risk of prostate cancer in the short term.
- Published
- 2020