Search

Background: Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) benefit adult cancer care, but their use in pediatric cancer care is limited., Objectives: To explore the feasibility of collecting weekly ePROMs from pediatric cancer patients and/or their caregivers and to describe children's levels of symptom burden, distress, and cancer-related quality of life., Methods: A prospective and longitudinal cohort study was undertaken at one tertiary children's cancer center. Children (2-18 years)/caregivers completed ePROMs with validated measures for distress, symptom burden, and cancer-related quality of life weekly for 8 weeks., Results: Seventy children/caregivers participated in the study, and 69% completed ePROMs at all 8 weeks. Distress and cancer-related quality of life significantly improved over time. However, at week 8, almost half of the participants still reported high levels of distress. Symptom burden decreased over time, with the youngest and the oldest age groups (2-3 and 13-18 years) reporting the highest number of symptoms with severe burden., Conclusions: Weekly collection of ePROMs in pediatric cancer care is feasible. Although distress, quality of life, and symptom burden improve over time, there is a need for timely assessment and interventions to improve symptoms, high levels of distress, and issues that negatively affect quality of life., Implications for Practice: Nurses are ideally placed to intervene, assess, and monitor symptoms and to provide symptom management advice to pediatric cancer patients and caregivers. Findings from this study may inform the design of models of pediatric cancer care to improve communication with the healthcare team and patient experience of care., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite tremendous progress in understanding the unmet needs of cancer survivors, our understanding of oncology nurses' perspectives and practices in the delivery of survivorship care is inadequate., Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess oncology nurses' perceptions about their responsibility and frequency of delivery of survivorship care to cancer patients and to examine the factors influencing such care., Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to 81 nurses working in the oncology unit of hospitals in Hong Kong. Participants completed an investigator-developed questionnaire designed to assess oncology nurses' perceptions of responsibility, practices, and barriers regarding the provision of survivorship care for cancer patients., Results: Results revealed discrepancies between oncology nurses' perceptions of responsibility and practices, with high levels of perceptions of various survivorship care as their responsibility but low levels in delivery of such care. Despite that discussing and managing pain was agreed by most oncology nurses as their responsibility (95.1%), 34.6% of them have never managed survivors' pain. Besides, 33.3% of nurses have never discussed and managed survivors' sexuality issues. Lack of time (79.0%), inadequate educational resources for family members (59.3%), and lack of knowledge and skills (54.4%) were major factors that impeded survivorship care provision., Conclusions: This study provides further evidence for inadequacies of oncology nurses in delivering survivorship care and their perceived barriers. Further studies are required to enhance our understanding of the strategies for improving the quality of cancer survivorship care., Implications for Practice: Results underscore the need to develop educational resources and enhance training in survivorship care for oncology nurses., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)