Search

Background: An Australian industry-funded decision impact study demonstrated that Oncotype Dx (ODX) changed treatment recommendations (TR) in 24% of hormone receptor+/HER2- patients. ODX is available in Australia, but is self-funded by patients (∼USD 4175), so its use is limited. We sought to evaluate the impact of self-funded ODX on TRs. A high proportion of TR changes would imply a benefit to the broader community if ODX testing were available to all appropriately selected patients. Methods: All Australian physicians who had ordered >5 ODX were invited to participate. Data collected included demographics, tumor characteristics, indication for ODX (confirm need for chemotherapy (CT), confirm omission of CT, or genuine equipoise). Pre- and post Recurrence Score (RS) TRs (CT recommended versus hormone therapy alone (HT)) were also collected. The primary endpoint was the frequency and predictors of TR change. Relationships between categorical variables were assessed using Chi2 test and logistic regression analysis determined factors associated with TR change post-ODX. Results: 382 patients with median age 54 (range 31-76) were included. 18 physicians contributed a median of 17 (5-87) patients. Tumor characteristics were: T1 232 (61%); ≥T2 150 (39%); grade 1 49 (13%), grade 2 252 (66%) and grade 3 79 (21%) and Ki67>15% in 131/231 (49%). 257 (67%) were node negative (N0). Assay indications were: confirm need for CT in 36%, confirm omission of CT in 40% and genuine equipoise in 24%. RS was low in 55%, intermediate in 36% and high in 9%. Of 355 patients with a TR recorded pre-ODX, 38% had TR change post-ODX. 109/168 patients (65%) recommended CT pre-ODX changed to HT alone, and this was more likely if lower grade (82.1% vs 50.8% p15% (27.5% vs 9.8% p=0.015). Overall, TR for CT decreased from 47% to 24%. Influence of adverse prognostic factors (defined as ≥T2, grade 3, ER and/or PR Number of "adverse factors"01234N0 (n=234)Number of patients90116244 RS median (range)16 (0-40)17 (0-41)26 (5-52)31 (22-40) TR change19/90 (21%)45/116 (39%)6/24 (25%)2/4 HT to CT7/71 (10%)10/61 (16%)2/11 (18%)1/2 CT to HT12/19 (63%)35/55 (64%)4/13 (31%)1/2 N+ (n=114)Number of patients22424181 RS median (range)14 (5-34)16 (0-38)14 (0-32)24 (12-50)39 TR change11/22 (50%)21/42 (50%)25/41 (42%)3/8 (38%)0/1 HT to CT3/13 (23%)3/14 (21%)0/12NANA CT to HT8/9 (89%)18/28 (64%)25/29 (86%)3/7 (43%)0/1 Conclusions: Patient self-funded ODX changed TRs in 38%. 65% who would have been recommended CT pre-ODX were spared CT post-ODX, suggesting that traditional histopathological indications for CT in ER+ patients has led to many receiving CT unnecessarily. Where the pre ODX TR was HT alone, only 14% changed to adding CT, suggesting that the indication was reassurance that CT could be omitted. Consideration could be made for third party funding in select patient groups. Citation Format: Chin-Lenn L, Segelov E, De Boer R, Marx G, Hughes TM, McCarthy N, White S, Foo S, Rutovitz J, Della Fiorentina S, Jennens R, Antill Y, Tsoi D, Cronk M, Lombard J, Kiely BE, Chirgwin J, Gorelik A, Mann GB. Indications for, and impact of oncotype DX on adjuvant treatment recommendations when third party funding is unavailable. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-15-02.

Background: The combination of CDK 4/6 inhibition and endocrine therapy has emerged as the new first line standard of care treatment for patients with hormone receptor (HR) +ve metastatic breast cancer (MBC)1. Ribociclib plus letrozole has been shown to improve PFS (25.3 vs 16.0 months; log-rank P=9.63x10-8) compared to letrozole alone2. More recently, this benefit has also been demonstrated in pre- and peri-menopausal women in combination with ovarian suppression and tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor (AI), with an improved overall survival (40.9 months vs OS not reached; HR = 0.712; p=0.00973) in the MONALEESA-7 study3. Approximately 800 patients in Australia participated in the ribociclib medicine access program (MAP) between May 2017 and June 2018, prior to government funding. Beyond eligibility criteria for the program and clinician name, no patient data was initially captured, consistent with usual practice for MAPs, due to the multiple challenges related to ethics, data ownership, security and patient privacy. We have previously demonstrated the feasibility of successful data collection alongside MAPs4 which can yield benefits for clinicians, industry and the broader medical community. Based on this we plan to retrospectively collect data for patients treated as part of the Australian ribociclib MAP. Trial Design: This is a secondary data use, non-interventional study of patients in Australia who received treatment with the combination of an AI and ribociclib, obtained via a MAP, for HR+ HER2- MBC. The target sample size is 250 patients from ~15 sites. De-identified patient data will be retrieved from the patient’s medical records and entered on to an electronic case report form. Data collection is anticipated to commence in July 2019 with the final treatment and survival outcomes collected in late 2020, thus allowing for a minimum of 24 month follow up for all patients from the start date of treatment with ribociclib and AI (May 2017 - June 2018). Study Aims: The primary aim of the study is to describe real world clinical and tumour characteristics of patients with HR+ HER2-ve MBC in Australia who are recommended and received ribociclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor in the first line setting. Details of adjuvant therapy received and the tolerability of the treatment combination including dose interruptions, dose reductions and significant adverse events of interest related to ribociclib will be assessed. Secondary aims include time to treatment progression and progression free survival for the ribociclib and AI combination, and to explore the disease course post progression, including clinician choice of subsequent lines of therapy in routine clinical practice. References: 1. Cardoso F, Senkus E, Costa A et al. 4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4). Ann Oncol 2018;29:1634-1657. 2. Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap YS, Sonke GS, Paluch-Shimon S, et al. Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2018;29:1541-47. 3. Im SA, Lu YS, Bardia A, et al: Overall survival with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. June 4, 2019 (early release online) 4. Lok SW, De Boer R, Cordwell C et al. Demonstrating the feasibility of collecting secondary, de-identified data on Australian patients receiving treatment as part of a Medicine Access Program. Intern Med J. 2019 Feb 28. Acknowledgement We thank Novartis for providing funding for this Research Collaboration. Citation Format: Sheau Wen Lok, Sally Baron-Hay, Elgene Lim, Robert Blum, Fran Boyle, Kerrie Clarke, Katharine Cuff, Michael Green, Laeeq Malik, Kelly Mok, Nick Murray, Louise Nott, Michelle Nottage, Ali Tafreshi, Daphne Tsoi, Belinda Yeo, Peter Gibbs, Richard De Boer. A 'real world' experience of CDK4/6 inhibition with ribociclib and endocrine therapy in hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer in Australia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-02-01.