1. The limitations of the G1-S checkpoint.
- Author
-
Deckbar D, Stiff T, Koch B, Reis C, Löbrich M, and Jeggo PA
- Subjects
- Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins, Cell Cycle Proteins physiology, Cell Division genetics, Cell Division radiation effects, Checkpoint Kinase 1, Checkpoint Kinase 2, Chromosome Breakage, DNA Damage, DNA-Binding Proteins physiology, Fibroblasts cytology, Fibroblasts physiology, Fibroblasts radiation effects, Flow Cytometry, G1 Phase genetics, G1 Phase radiation effects, G2 Phase genetics, G2 Phase radiation effects, Histones physiology, Humans, Infrared Rays, Protein Kinases physiology, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases physiology, S Phase genetics, S Phase radiation effects, Tumor Suppressor Proteins physiology, G1 Phase physiology, S Phase physiology
- Abstract
It has been proposed that the G(1)-S checkpoint is the critical regulator of genomic stability, preventing the cell cycle progression of cells with a single DNA double-strand break. Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of asynchronous cells and microscopic analysis of asynchronous and synchronized cells, we show that full blockage of S-phase entry is only observed >4 hours after irradiation. The process is ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) dependent and Chk1/2 independent and can be activated throughout G(1) phase. By monitoring S-phase entry of irradiated synchronized cells, we show that the duration of arrest is dose dependent, with S-phase entry recommencing after arrest with kinetics similar to that observed in unirradiated cells. Thus, G(1)-S checkpoint arrest is not always permanent. Following exposure to higher doses (> or =2 Gy), G(1)-S arrest is inefficiently maintained, allowing progression of G(1)-phase cells into G(2) with elevated gammaH2AX foci and chromosome breaks. At early times after irradiation (< or =4 h), G(1)-S checkpoint arrest is not established but cells enter S phase at a reduced rate. This early slowing in S-phase entry is ATM and Chk2 dependent and detectable after 100 mGy, showing a novel and sensitive damage response. However, the time needed to establish G(1)-S checkpoint arrest provides a window when cells can progress to G(2) and form chromosome breaks. Our findings detail the efficacy of the G(1)-S checkpoint and define two significant limitations: At early times after IR, the activated checkpoint fails to efficiently prevent S-phase entry, and at later times, the checkpoint is inefficiently maintained., (Copyright 2010 AACR.)
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF