Search

When liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma are detected, the surgeon must decide whether or not the patient is a candidate for resection. Even though long-term survival after resection is far from optimal, the relegation of patients to nonresective treatment means denying them the only chance for cure currently available. Better understanding of liver anatomy and improvement in resection techniques have decreased the morbidity and mortality. The RHM and the GITSG reports have better defined the prognostic factors for resections of colorectal liver metastases and allowed for a better understanding of the indications for resection. During the last decades, liver resection has been extended to older patients, patients with multiple liver lesions, and patients with larger solitary metastases. At the same time, anatomic rather than wedge resections are more common, and it is preferable to perform the colon and liver resection at different stages. The end result has been a marked increase in the number of hepatic resections performed for colorectal liver metastases during the last two decades.

The western HCC registry comprised data from 322 patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC over a 50-year period. The majority of patients had lesions4 cm and were symptomatic at presentation. Lesions were mostly unicentric. Cirrhosis was not a prevalent problem, unlike the East. In the most recent decade, 1980-1989, we noted a significant decrease in operative mortality from 19% to 10% overall, and 15% to 4% in the noncirrhotic group. We identified four variables that resulted in poorer postresectional outcome: cirrhosis, regional nodal disease, multicentric disease, and tumor-free resectional margin1 cm. Although these factors are associated with a poorer outcome after resection, whether they should serve as contraindications to surgery should be determined by individual surgeons, taking into account the patient's overall status, concomitant risk factors, and treatment objectives.