1. Oncologic Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning Methods in CT Spine Imaging—A Systematic Review.
- Author
-
Ong, Wilson, Lee, Aric, Tan, Wei Chuan, Fong, Kuan Ting Dominic, Lai, Daoyong David, Tan, Yi Liang, Low, Xi Zhen, Ge, Shuliang, Makmur, Andrew, Ong, Shao Jin, Ting, Yong Han, Tan, Jiong Hao, Kumar, Naresh, and Hallinan, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy
- Subjects
ARTIFICIAL intelligence ,COMPUTED tomography ,RADIOMICS ,SPINAL tumors ,EVALUATION of medical care ,TUMOR markers ,DECISION making ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,WORKFLOW ,MEDLINE ,DEEP learning ,MACHINE learning ,ONLINE information services - Abstract
Simple Summary: In recent years, advances in deep learning have transformed the analysis of medical imaging, especially in spine oncology. Computed Tomography (CT) imaging is crucial for diagnosing, planning treatment, and monitoring spinal tumors. This review aims to comprehensively explore the current uses of deep learning tools in CT-based spinal oncology. Additionally, potential clinical applications of AI designed to address common challenges in this field will also be addressed. In spinal oncology, integrating deep learning with computed tomography (CT) imaging has shown promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and patient outcomes. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on artificial intelligence (AI) applications in CT imaging for spinal tumors. A PRISMA-guided search identified 33 studies: 12 (36.4%) focused on detecting spinal malignancies, 11 (33.3%) on classification, 6 (18.2%) on prognostication, 3 (9.1%) on treatment planning, and 1 (3.0%) on both detection and classification. Of the classification studies, 7 (21.2%) used machine learning to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, 3 (9.1%) evaluated tumor stage or grade, and 2 (6.1%) employed radiomics for biomarker classification. Prognostic studies included three (9.1%) that predicted complications such as pathological fractures and three (9.1%) that predicted treatment outcomes. AI's potential for improving workflow efficiency, aiding decision-making, and reducing complications is discussed, along with its limitations in generalizability, interpretability, and clinical integration. Future directions for AI in spinal oncology are also explored. In conclusion, while AI technologies in CT imaging are promising, further research is necessary to validate their clinical effectiveness and optimize their integration into routine practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF