Search

Simple Summary: Despite advances in head and neck cancer control, survivors encounter significant difficulties accessing survivorship care in the USA. We conducted a qualitative study aimed to better understand their experiences and identify unmet needs. Fifteen long-term head and neck cancer survivors were interviewed, where themes around chronic emotional distress, fatigue, and disruptions in daily life emerged across the focus group. Secondary issues included sleep problems, cognitive difficulties, and other health conditions. Surprisingly, physical symptoms like pain and changes in appetite were less discussed. These findings underscore the need for tailored holistic multi-dimensional cancer survivorship programs that address physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being. The study highlights the importance of increased awareness and comprehensive long-term support to prioritize and enhance quality of life for the head and neck cancer survivorship community. Improved rates of cancer control have increased the head and neck cancer survivor population. Cancer survivorship clinics are not widely available in the USA, and longitudinal supportive care for patients undergoing multimodal therapy has not advanced at a pace commensurate with improvements in cancer control. Consequently, a large head and neck cancer survivor population whose quality of life may be chronically and/or permanently diminished presently exists. This lack of awareness perpetuates under-recognition and under-investigation, leaving survivors' (mostly detrimental) experiences largely uncharted. We conducted a qualitative exploration of survivors' experiences, aiming to unpack the profound impact of late systemic symptoms on daily life, encompassing work, relationships, and self-identity in the head and neck cancer survivor community. The study included 15 remitted head and neck survivors, ≥12 months from their final treatment, who participated in semi-structured interviews conducted by a medical oncologist. Data analysis comprised qualitative thematic analysis, specifically inductive hierarchical linear modeling, enriched by a deductive approach of anecdotal clinical reporting. Results highlighted that 43.36% of all quotation material discussed in the interviews pertained to chronic emotion disturbance with significant implications for other domains of life. A central symptom cluster comprised impairments in mood/emotions, daily activity, and significant fatigue. Dysfunction in sleep, other medical conditions, and cognitive deficits comprised a secondary cluster. Physical dysfunctionality, encompassing pain, appetite, and eating, and alterations in experienced body temperature, constituted a tertiary cluster, and perhaps were surprisingly the least discussed symptom burden among head and neck cancer survivors. Symptoms causing heightened long-term survivor burden may be considered epiphenomenal to central physical dysfunctionality, albeit being presently the least represented in cancer survivor care programs. Moving forward, the development of targeted and multi-dimensional treatment programs that encompass physical, psychosocial, and spiritual domains are needed to increase clinical specificity and effective holistic long-term solutions that will foster a more compassionate and informed future of care for the cancer survivorship community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Superficial bladder cancer is a common disease. The standard method for treatment is a transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). This is a surgery under general anaesthesia with a complication rate of up to 26%, and it is potentially associated with severe side effects. A newer method, transurethral laser ablation (TULA), is a less invasive procedure performed under local anaesthesia and with a lower risk of complications. We aimed to compare these different transurethral procedures in the treatment of bladder tumours to evaluate any clinically relevant differences in symptoms and side effects. We used questionnaires regarding urinary symptoms, postoperative side effects, and quality of life. We showed that patients undergoing TURBT reported a more extensive early symptom burden and had a higher need for contacting the healthcare system compared to TULA-treated patients. If some TURBTs can be replaced with TULA, it will be beneficial for both future patients and the healthcare system. The standard procedure for diagnosis and treatment of bladder tumours, transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT), is associated with a complication rate of up to 26% and potentially has severe influence on patient-reported outcomes (PRO). Outpatient transurethral laser ablation (TULA) is an emerging new modality that is less invasive with a lower risk of complications and, thereby, possibly enhanced PRO. We collected PRO following transurethral procedures in treatment of bladder tumours to evaluate any clinically relevant differences in symptoms and side effects. This prospective observational study recruited consecutive patients undergoing different bladder tumour-related transurethral procedures. Patients filled out questionnaires regarding urinary symptoms (ICIQ-LUTS), postoperative side effects, and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L) at days 1 and 14 postoperatively. In total, 108 patients participated. The most frequently reported outcomes were postoperative haematuria and pain. Patients undergoing TURBT reported longer lasting haematuria, a higher perception of pain, and a more negative impact on quality of life compared to patients undergoing TULA. TURBT-treated patients had more cases of acute urinary retention and a higher need for contacting the healthcare system. Side effects following transurethral procedures were common but generally not severe. The early symptom burden following TURBT was more extensive than that following TULA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Catastrophism was not associated with the levels of pain intensity, PSG, PSGR, and PGI for pain, except the rumination subscale that was independently associated with pain intensity at T0. A comprehensive palliative care management provided the relevant changes in symptom burden and annulled the pain expression associated with rumination. Background: Pain catastrophizing is a group of negative irrational cognitions in the context of anticipated or actual pain. The aim of this study was to decipher the possible role of catastrophism on pain expression and outcomes after a comprehensive palliative care treatment. Methods: A consecutive sample of patients with uncontrolled pain was assessed. Demographic characteristics, symptom intensity included in the Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS), and opioid drugs used were recorded at admission (T0). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) was measured for patients. Patients were also asked about their personalized symptom goal (PSG) for each symptom of ESAS. One week after a comprehensive palliative care treatment (T7), ESAS and opioid doses used were recorded again, and the number of patients who achieved their PSG (PSGR) were calculated. At the same interval (T7), Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) was calculated using patient global impression (PGI). Results: Ninety-five patients were eligible. A significant decrease in symptom intensity was reported for all ESAS items. PGI was positive for all symptoms, with higher values for pain, poor well-being, and poor sleep. Only the rumination subscale of catastrophism was significantly associated with pain at T0 (B = 0.540; p = 0.034). Conclusions: Catastrophism was not associated with the levels of pain intensity, PSG, PSGR, and PGI for pain, except the rumination subscale that was associated with pain intensity at T0. A comprehensive palliative care management provided the relevant changes in symptom burden, undoing the pain expression associated with rumination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study examined patient-reported outcomes from a local tertiary palliative care unit (TPCU; locally named the IPCU) compared to published outcomes from other Canadian TPCUs. A retrospective file review revealed that compared to published Canadian TPCU data, the IPCU population was younger with more advanced cancer, the rate of hospital deaths was lower, and discharge to preferred locations was better. This service is well integrated in a variety of palliative care services within the health region, providing care at appropriate levels of need. We interpret that when enveloped in well-organized services within the region, a TPCU may be better able to prioritize patients with later-stage disease, facilitate the management of symptom crises earlier, and improve the rates of discharge to preferred locations. Palliative care offers symptom relief and improved quality of life. Tertiary palliative care units (TPCUs) focus on complex suffering under the care of specialist palliative physicians and interdisciplinary teams. The Intensive Palliative Care Unit (IPCU) is a TPCU integrated in well-developed region-wide palliative services in Calgary, Canada. We compared the population accessing the IPCU to published data from other Canadian sites. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted using 8 sample months over a 2-year period. We gleaned psychosocial and medical demographics alongside the self-reported symptom burden on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: Adults (n = 117) with cancer admitted to the IPCU were 5–10 years younger, had later-stage cancer, and had higher discharges to preferred locations than other published Canadian TPCUs. Up to two months before admission, most commonly reported symptoms were consistent with the outpatient literature although with higher reported intensity. Discussion: With more advanced disease, younger age, and elevated symptom burden before admission, the IPCU still discharged patients to preferred locations at higher rates than other sites. This may be due to integration in the region's organized palliative care services. Conclusion: With proper integration, a TPCU may be able to improve quality of life and reduce deaths in hospitals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Professionals of the healthcare system face the challenge of providing suitable care delivery for inpatients with advanced cancer. External assessments, such as nurse-reported symptom burden, tend to underrate patients' distress, as has already been shown in different studies. In contrast to that, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been shown to be effective as a systematic assessment; however, they are not yet implemented into daily routine. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the information provided by PROMs and nurse-reported assessment to identify overlaps and differences in the current symptom burden. Therefore, collected data were analyzed from both PROMs and nurse-reported assessment from 230 inpatients of a major German Comprehensive Cancer Center. We discovered that some features of physical and psychological distress were underrated by nursing staff. Supplementing daily symptom assessment used by nursing staff with systematic ePROMs may improve the quality of supportive and palliative care of inpatients with advanced cancer. For advanced cancer inpatients, the established standard for gathering information about symptom burden involves a daily assessment by nursing staff using validated assessments. In contrast, a systematic assessment of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is required, but it is not yet systematically implemented. We hypothesized that current practice results in underrating the severity of patients' symptom burden. To explore this hypothesis, we have established systematic electronic PROMs (ePROMs) using validated instruments at a major German Comprehensive Cancer Center. In this retrospective, non-interventional study, lasting from September 2021 to February 2022, we analyzed collected data from 230 inpatients. Symptom burden obtained by nursing staff was compared to the data acquired by ePROMs. Differences were detected by performing descriptive analyses, Chi-Square tests, Fisher's exact, Phi-correlation, Wilcoxon tests, and Cohen's r. Our analyses pointed out that pain and anxiety especially were significantly underrated by nursing staff. Nursing staff ranked these symptoms as non-existent, whereas patients stated at least mild symptom burden (pain: meanNRS/epaAC = 0 (no); meanePROM = 1 (mild); p < 0.05; r = 0.46; anxiety: meanepaAC = 0 (no); meanePROM = 1 (mild); p < 0.05; r = 0.48). In conclusion, supplementing routine symptom assessment used daily by nursing staff with the systematic, e-health-enabled acquisition of PROMs may improve the quality of supportive and palliative care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: We know that socio-economic factors influence delay in presentation and diagnosis of cancer and that patients living in areas of greater socio-economic deprivation are less likely to be referred to palliative care services including hospice. However, very little is known regarding the impact of socio-economic deprivation on symptom burden in advanced cancer patients. Our study found that patients experiencing greater socio-economic deprivation were more likely to report depression and pain and greater global symptom burden than patients from less socio-economically deprived areas. We also found that reporting a lack of information at time of diagnosis was significantly associated with socio-economic deprivation. Although more than one-third of patients recruited into this study were diagnosed with cancer within the preceding 12 months, this was not associated with socio-economic factors and socio-economic factors did not appear to influence survival in our study. The impact of socio-economic factors on symptom burden and information needs should be acknowledged within palliative care settings. Socio-economic deprivation is known to impact on cancer diagnosis, treatment and access to services, but little is known of the impact of socio-economic deprivation on symptom burden in patients with advanced cancer. Patients with advanced cancer attending hospice day services were recruited into a 24 week longitudinal study. An area-based index of social deprivation was collected along with depression and symptom burden at baseline, 8, 16 and 24 weeks. Of the 595 patients included, with an age range of 33–89 years and a mean age of 68 years, 67% were female, and 37% were diagnosed with cancer in the last 12 months. Twenty nine percent lived in one of the most deprived 20% of neighbourhoods. Patients living in the most socio-economically deprived areas were significantly likely to report receiving insufficient information regarding their cancer at diagnosis (p = 0.007), greater pain (p = 0.02), moderate to severe depression (p = 0.04) and higher global symptom burden (p = 0.04). This study is the first to report that patients with advanced cancer attending hospice services, living in the most deprived neighbourhoods experience significantly greater symptom burden, notably depression and pain. We recommend using patient outcome measures in order to provide targeted support and thereby reduce the increased symptom burden that socio-economically disadvantaged patients experience at the end of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]