Search

According to a modern view, cancer no longer follows a purely mechanistic model. Rather, a tumor is conceived as a more complex structure, composed of cancer cells, the activities of which may interact and reshape the so-called tumor microenvironment (TME), leading to preservation of specific tumoral niches and promoting the survival of tumoral stem cells. Background/Objective : Therapeutic strategies must deal with this unique cancer architecture in the near future by widening their range of activities outside the cancer cells and rewiring a TME to ensure it is hostile to cancer growth. Therefore, an intratumoral therapeutic strategy may open the door to a new type of anticancer activity, one that directly injures the tumoral structure while also eliciting an influence on the TME through local and systemic immunomodulation. This review would like to assess the current situation of intratumoral strategies and their clinical implications. Methods We analyzed data from phase I, II, and III trials, comprehensive reviews and relevant clinical and preclinical research, from robust databases, like PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov. Results: Intratumoral strategies can be quite variable. It is possible the injection and inhalation of traditional antiblastic agents or immunomodulant agents, or intrapleural administration. Ablation strategy is available, both thermal and photodynamic method. Moreover, TTfields and NPs are analyzed and also brachytherapy is mentioned. Intratumoral therapy can find space in "adjuvant"/perioperative or metastatic settings. Finally, intratumoral strategies allow to synergize their activities with systemic therapies, guaranteeing better local and systemic disease control. Conclusions: Intratumoral strategies are overall promising. Antiblastic/immunomodulant injection and NPs use are especially interesting and intriguing. But, there is generally a lack of phase II and III trials, in particular NPs use need additional experimentation and clinical studies.

Lung cancer is one of the most common human malignancies and the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Novel therapeutic approaches, like targeted therapies against specific molecular alterations and immunotherapy, have revolutionized in the last decade the oncological outcomes in patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The advent of immunotherapy for the treatment of NSCLC has significantly improved overall and progression-free survival, as well as the patient's quality of life in comparison to traditional chemotherapy. Currently, it is estimated that long-term survival can be achieved in more than 15% of NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy. Therefore, the optimal duration of immunotherapy in long survivors needs to be established to avoid overtreatment, side effects, and high costs and at the same time, protect them from potential disease relapse or progression. We performed a narrative review to discuss all the aspects related to the optimal duration of immunotherapy in long survivors with NSCLC. Data regarding the duration of immunotherapy in the most impacting clinical trials were collected, along with data regarding the impact of toxicities, side effects, and costs for healthcare providers. In addition, the two-year immunotherapy scheme in patients who benefit from first-line or subsequent treatment lines are examined, and the need for biomarkers that can predict outcomes during and after immunotherapy cessation in patients affected by NSCLC are discussed.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the deadliest thoracic neoplasms, in part due to its fast doubling time and early metastatic spread. Historically, cytotoxic chemotherapy consisting of platinum-etoposide or anthracycline-based regimens has demonstrated a high response rate, but early chemoresistance leads to a poor prognosis in advanced SCLC. Only a fraction of patients with limited-disease can be cured by chemo-radiotherapy. Given the disappointing survival rates in advanced SCLC, new cytotoxic agents are eagerly awaited. Unfortunately, few novel chemotherapy drugs have been developed in the latest decades. This review describes the results and potential application in the clinical practice of novel chemotherapy agents for SCLC.