Search

Background: The induction and regulation of immune responses depend on human leucocyte antigen (HLA) molecules that present peptides derived from mutated neoantigens or tumor-associated antigens to cytotoxic T cells. The natural variation of HLA molecules might differ between tumor patients and the normal population. Thus, there might be associations between the frequencies of HLA alleles and the survival of tumor patients., Methods: This issue was studied in a cohort of 84 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) of different localizations. The cohort was followed up for more than 10 years. HLA-A/B/C CTS-PCR-SSP typing at 1 field level from blood samples was performed, and the results were correlated with survival., Results: HLA-A*02 was the most prevalent allele in our cohort and was present in 51.1% of patients. The HLA-A*25 and HLA-C*06 alleles exhibited a significantly higher frequency in cancer patients than in the normal population of 174 blood and kidney donors ( p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively, Fisher's exact test). For HLA-C*04, a negative impact on overall survival in univariate analysis ( p = 0.045) and a negative, but statistically insignificant effect on survival toward poorer survival in multivariate analysis (HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 0.99-3.34, p = 0.053) were observed. In addition, HLA-A*02 was also beneficial for overall survival and progression-free survival in multivariate analysis (HR 0.54; 95% CI: 0.31-0.92; p = 0.023)., Conclusion: HLA-A*02 allele expression might not only predict better survival but might also indicate superior tumor antigen presentation and, thus, help to select patients who could benefit from T-cell-dependent immunotherapies.

For advanced laryngeal cancers, after randomized prospective larynx preservation studies, nonsurgical therapy has been applied on a large scale as an alternative to laryngectomy. For T4 laryngeal cancer, poorer survival has been reported after nonsurgical treatment. Is there a need to fear worse survival also in T3 tumors? The outcomes of 121 T3 cancers treated with pCRT, pRT alone, or surgery were evaluated in an observational cohort study in Germany. In a multivariate Cox regression of the T3 subgroup, no survival difference was noted between pCRT and total laryngectomy with risk-adopted adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (TL ± a(C)RT) (HR 1.20; 95%-CI: 0.57-2.53; p = 0.63). However, survival was significantly worse after pRT alone than after TL ± a(C)RT (HR 4.40; 95%-CI: 1.72-11.28, p = 0.002). A literature search shows that in cases of unfavorable prognostic markers (bulky tumors of 6-12 ccm, vocal cord fixation, minimal cartilage infiltration, or N2-3), pCRT instead of pRT is indicated. In cases of pretreatment dysphagia or aspiration requiring a feeding tube or tracheostomy, gross or multiple cartilage infiltration, or tumor volume > 12 ccm, outcomes after pCRT were significantly worse than those after TL. In these cases, and in cases where pCRT is indicated but the patient is not suitable for the addition of chemotherapy, upfront total laryngectomy with stage-appropriate aRT is recommended even in T3 laryngeal cancers.

T1 glottic cancer is a highly treatable disease with local control (LC) rates over 90% by either primary radiotherapy (pRT) or transoral laser microsurgery (TLM). LC of T2 glottic cancers is 15 percent points poorer on average. However, salvage after pRT entails more than 50% total laryngectomy. Therefore, there is a need for enhanced LC. Altered fractionation regimens improved LC in T1 but not in T2. For this reason, for T2, alternative strategies must be considered. In a large observational cohort study including 531 early-stage laryngeal cancers, a small number of patients were treated with primary chemoradiotherapy (pCRT). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with significantly poorer outcomes included age, comorbidities, supraglottic localization, and T category. While there was a significant difference between pRT and surgery (HR 1.79; 95%-CI: 1.15-2.79), there was none between pCRT and surgery (HR 0.70; 95%-CI: 0.33-1.51). There is evidence from the literature that pCRT in early glottic cancers could yield results that surpass the limits so far experienced in radiotherapy alone with acceptable toxicity. Thus, prospective randomized studies with larger numbers of patients are warranted.

Supraglottic laryngeal cancer is characterized by poor prognosis. In contrast, excellent outcomes have been published in early-stage supraglottic cancers after laser surgery in single-institutional series in centers of excellence. Are these results reproducible in the normal clinical practice of less specialized facilities? As part of an observational cohort study, the outcomes of 194 supraglottic cancer patients were assessed after treatment by larynx-preserving surgery (transoral laser microsurgery [TLM] or open partial laryngectomy [OPL]) or total laryngectomy (TL), with each having risk-adopted adjuvant treatment, or primary (chemo-)radiotherapy (pCRT or pRT). In early-stage supraglottic cancers, TLM achieved a 5-year overall survival (5-year OS) of 62.0%. No significant survival difference could be discerned between patients with and without adjuvant treatment (HR 1.47; 95% CI: 0.80 2.69). The comparison between pCRT and pRT patients suggests that CRT is more effective in supraglottic cancer. The 5-year OS rate achieved in our multiinstitutional setting is comparable to that reached in laser surgery centers of excellence (59.4-76.0%). According to our data and supported by the literature, adjuvant RT (aRT) is not sufficiently effective in supraglottic cancers. In case adjuvant therapy is indicated, adjuvant chemoradiation (aCRT) could be recommended.

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) forms a distinct tumor entity with better survival clinical outcome. Numerous underlying molecular mechanisms have been postulated for differences in treatment response, but the impact of MEK/ERK signaling, a main driver of carcinogenesis in various cancers including OPSCC and key player mediating therapy resistance remains elusive. In a retrospective experimental cohort study, primary tumor samples from OPSCC patients ( n = 124) were available on tissue microarrays (TMAs) and expression levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2 (pERK1/2) were detected by immunohistochemical staining. Correlations of pERK1/2 expression patterns with clinicopathological features and clinical outcome were evaluated by statistical analysis. A low pERK1/2 expression was strongly associated with HPV-related OPSCC, while primary tumors with high pERK1/2 staining showed a distinctly worse survival outcome and were associated with higher cellular differentiation. Co-activation of both ERK1/2 and AKT was a common event and was associated with unfavorable prognosis in our cohort. However, the combinatorial analysis of pAKT (Ser473) and pERK1/2 did not strengthen the predictive power of pERK1/2, suggesting that pERK1/2 plays a more significant function in OPSCC. In summary, our data provide a compelling experimental and statistical evidence that low levels of tumor cell intrinsic ERK1/2 activation contribute at least in part to the favorable outcome of HPV-related OPSCC. On the other hand, presented findings indicate that non-HPV-related OPSCC with elevated ERK phosphorylation are at high risk for treatment failure and might benefit from targeted therapy of MEK/ERK signaling.