1. First Line Systemic Treatment for MALT Lymphoma—Do We Still Need Chemotherapy? Real World Data from the Medical University Vienna
- Author
-
Ingrid Simonitsch-Klupp, Markus Raderer, Werner Dolak, Julius Lukas, Barbara Kiesewetter, and Marius E. Mayerhoefer
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,immunomodulatory treatment ,Ofatumumab ,chemotherapy ,Gastroenterology ,lcsh:RC254-282 ,extranodal lymphoma ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,immune system diseases ,Internal medicine ,hemic and lymphatic diseases ,medicine ,MALT lymphoma ,Lenalidomide ,Chemotherapy ,business.industry ,Bortezomib ,Gastric lymphoma ,medicine.disease ,lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,Regimen ,Oncology ,chemistry ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Rituximab ,business ,030215 immunology ,medicine.drug - Abstract
There is no clear therapeutic algorithm for mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma beyond Helicobacter pylori eradication and while chemotherapy-based regimens are standard for MALT lymphoma patients in need of systemic treatment, it appears of interest to also investigate chemotherapy-free strategies. We have retrospectively assessed MALT lymphoma patients undergoing upfront systemic treatment, classified either as chemotherapy (=classical cytostatic agents +/&minus, rituximab) or immunotherapy (=immunomodulatory agents or single anti-CD20 antibodies) at the Medical University Vienna 1999&ndash, 2019. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). In total, 159 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 67 months. The majority of patients had extragastric disease (80%), but we also identified 32 patients (20%) with Helicobacter pylori negative or disseminated gastric lymphoma. Regarding the type of first line treatment and outcome, 46% (74/159) received a chemotherapy-based regimen and 54% (85/159) immunotherapy including IMiDs lenalidomide/thalidomide (37%), anti-CD20-anitbodies rituximab/ofatumumab (27%), macrolides clarithromycin/azithromycin (27%) and proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (9%). Median PFS was 76 months (95%CI 50&ndash, 102), and while the overall response (90% vs. 68%, p <, 0.01) and the complete remission rate (75% vs. 43%, p <, 0.01) was significantly higher for chemotherapy, there was no difference in PFS between chemotherapy (median 81 months, 95%CI 47&ndash, 116) and immunotherapy (76 months, 95%CI 50&ndash, 103, p = 0.57), suggesting comparable long-term outcomes. To conclude, our data show higher response rates with chemo- compared to immunotherapy, but this did not translate into a superior PFS. Given the biological background of MALT lymphoma, and the favorable toxicity profile of novel immunomodulatory treatments, this should be further investigated.
- Published
- 2020