Search

Simple Summary: Follow-up protocols for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) include mainly cystoscopy and urinary cytology. However, the role of urine cytology during follow-up for low-grade (LG) NMIBC is not entirely known, and studies assessing adherence to guideline recommendations have revealed an overuse of urinary cytology. Our aim with this study was to evaluate the impact of urine cytology as a complementary method to cystoscopy during follow-up for LG NMIBC. We found that performing urine cytology during follow-up for primary LG non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is only useful to detect recurrences when suspicious lesions are seen during cystoscopic evaluation. Nevertheless, a positive cytology alerts to the risk of progression to high-grade disease during surveillance. Background and Objective: The role of urine cytology during follow-up for low-grade (LG) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is not well established, although cytology has low sensitivity in detecting LG recurrences. Our study aims to evaluate the impact of urine cytology as a complementary method to cystoscopy during follow-up for LG NMIBC. Methods: Patients diagnosed with primary LG TaT1 bladder cancer (BC) between 2010 and 2020 were included. Patients were stratified according to the EAU NMIBC scoring model. Urine cytology was performed during follow-up cystoscopy. The outcomes of the study were BC recurrence and upgrading to high-grade (HG). Cytology utility was established by assessing whether its result led to management change. Results: We included 337 patients with LG TaT1 BC. EAU risk group distribution was low in 262 (77.7%), intermediate in 57 (16.9%), and high-risk in 18 (5.3%) cases. With a median follow-up of 5 years, 166 (49.3%) patients experienced recurrence. Cystoscopy was positive in 154 (92.8%) and suspicious in 12 (7.2%) cases. Urine cytology was positive in 33 (19.9%) cases but only changed management in 3 (0.89%), all with suspicious cystoscopy. Positive cytology at first recurrence was associated with higher risk of upgrading during follow-up (HR 2.781, p = 0.006) and lower upgrading-free survival (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The role of urine cytology to detect first recurrences during follow-up for primary LG TaT1 NMIBC might be limited to patients with non-conclusive lesions in the cystoscopy. A positive cytology at first recurrence is associated with a higher risk of upgrading to HG BC during follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study analyzes real-world outcomes for advanced, non-oncogene addicted non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with atezolizumab monotherapy following platinum-based chemotherapy, based on data from two academic institutions in Serbia. Progression-free survival did not significantly differ between patients receiving atezolizumab as a second, third, or later line of therapy, indicating consistent efficacy across treatment lines. Additionally, the number of prior chemotherapy cycles had no significant impact on progression-free survival, suggesting that a higher prior treatment burden did not compromise atezolizumab effectiveness. Importantly, a good ECOG performance status emerged as the strongest predictor of prolonged progression-free survival, highlighting the importance of patients' health status at treatment initiation. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like atezolizumab have improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, especially in the second-line setting after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy. However, access to ICIs remains limited in many developing nations. This study evaluated the efficacy of atezolizumab as a second-line versus later-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients in Serbia. Methods: This retrospective study involved 147 advanced NSCLC patients treated with atezolizumab following progression on prior platinum-based chemotherapy at two academic centers in Serbia. Data on demographics and clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics were collected. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression identified outcome predictors. Results: The median PFS was 7.13 months, and median OS was 38.6 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 15%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 57.9%. No significant PFS differences were observed between patients treated with atezolizumab in the second line versus later lines. Patients with good performance status (ECOG 0–1) had significantly better PFS compared to those with poorer status (12.03 vs. 1.63 months, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Atezolizumab is effective in both second-line and later-line settings for advanced NSCLC, particularly in patients with good performance status. This highlights the importance of patient selection based on performance status, as well as the need for wider access to ICIs in resource-limited regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The identification of robust prognostic biomarkers is paramount for refining cancer treatment strategies, particularly in the era of precision medicine. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the prognostic significance of the neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) across various cancer types, with a specific focus on its correlation with OS and PFS. Pooled analyses demonstrated that elevated pretreatment NER levels were significantly associated with poorer OS and PFS. The study highlights NER as a promising and non-invasive biomarker that could help guide treatment decisions in cancer patients. However, further research is needed to confirm its potential across various cancer types and treatment settings. Background: The identification of reliable prognostic biomarkers is crucial for optimizing cancer treatment strategies, especially in the era of personalized medicine. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the prognostic significance of the neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) in various cancer types, with a focus on its association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies published up to 28 July 2024. We performed the meta-analyses with the generic inverse variance method with a random effects model and reported hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The comprehensive literature search identified 10 studies comprising 2351 patients. Pooled analyses demonstrated that elevated pretreatment NER levels were significantly correlated with poorer OS (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.28–2.36, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.21–1.95, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed a consistent adverse association between high NER and OS across various tumor types and geographic locations, although results from studies conducted in the Far East did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that elevated NER is associated with poorer OS and PFS in cancer patients, suggesting its potential utility as a non-invasive prognostic marker. Further validation in large, prospective studies is warranted to establish NER's role in guiding personalized treatment strategies across diverse oncologic contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Integrin α6β4 makes triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) more aggressive by controlling genes that drive tumor invasion and metastasis. PTPRZ1 is linked to cancer relapse, but its role in TNBC is not well understood. We discovered that PTPRZ1 expression is significantly increased by integrin α6β4 in TNBC. We also found that integrin β4 gene expression correlates with PTPRZ1 in breast cancer patient samples. Importantly, we found that integrin α6β4 controls PTPRZ1 through UCHL1, which in turn stabilized Hif-1α. When UCHL1 or PTPRZ1 are blocked, the aggressiveness driven by integrin β4 signaling decreased substantially. Data analysis showed that high levels of these genes (ITGB4, UCHL1, Hif1α, PTPRZ1) are linked to worse survival rates, especially in patients who received chemotherapy treatment. Our findings suggest that integrin α6β4 helps TNBC become invasive through UCHL1-Hif-1α regulation of PTPRZ1, pointing to a new approach to targeting integrin α6β4 signaling using PTPRZ1 and UCHL1 inhibitors. Integrin α6β4 drives triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) aggressiveness through the transcriptional regulation of key genes. Here, we investigated how integrin α6β4 regulates protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type Z1 (PTPRZ1). Using stable re-expression of integrin β4 (ITGB4) in cells naturally devoid of integrin α6β4 or knockdown or knockout (KO) of ITGB4, we found that integrin α6β4 regulates PTPRZ1 expression. To gain mechanistic insight, we focused on Hif-1α due to the impact of integrin α6β4 on a hypoxia-associated signature. We found that nuclear localization of Hif-1α, but not Hif-2α, was substantially enhanced with integrin α6β4 signaling. Hif-1α knockdown by shRNA or chemical inhibition decreased PTPRZ1 expression, while chemical activation of Hif-1α increased it. Upstream of Hif-1α, integrin α6β4 upregulates UCHL1 to stabilize Hif-1α and ultimately regulate PTPRZ1. Inhibition of UCHL1 and PTPRZ1 dramatically decreases integrin α6β4-mediated cell migration and three-dimensional invasive growth. Finally, public breast cancer database analyses demonstrated that ITGB4 correlates with PTPRZ1 and that high expression of ITGB4, UCHL1, HIF1A, and PTPRZ1 associated with decreased overall survival, distant metastasis free survival, post progression survival, and relapse-free survival. In summary, these findings provide a novel function of integrin α6β4 in promoting tumor invasive phenotypes through UCHL1-Hif-1α-mediated regulation of PTPRZ1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, particularly among patients with a specific mutation in the KRAS gene known as KRAS G12C. Two targeted therapies, adagrasib and sotorasib, have been developed for this mutation. This manuscript reviews three key clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy of these drugs in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC. We compare their effectiveness in slowing disease progression and examine their differing side effect profiles, both of which are crucial for treatment decisions. While both drugs demonstrate efficacy, their side effects can influence patient tolerance and overall experience. Understanding these differences enables physicians to make more informed choices about the most appropriate treatment for each patient. Our analysis indicates that, although the overall survival rates for both drugs are comparable, certain patients may derive greater benefits from one therapy over the other, depending on individual characteristics and the management of side effects. Background: The KRAS G12C mutation, prevalent in various malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), represents a unique therapeutic target. Adagrasib and sotorasib, two FDA-approved agents specifically targeting this mutation, have shown promise in clinical trials. This study aims to compare their efficacy in treating KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC, drawing insights from pivotal clinical trials. Methods: We analyzed data from three key clinical trials: KRYSTAL-1, CodeBreak100, and CodeBreak200. Our methodology involved reconstructing individual patient data from published Kaplan–Meier curves using the IPDfromKM tool (Version 0.1.10). The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), evaluated through hazard ratios (HRs) and the restricted mean survival time (RMST) method. Results: The HR for PFS favored adagrasib (HR: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.69, 1.19], p = 0.473), suggesting a non-significant trend toward better disease control compared to sotorasib. For OS, the HR was 0.99 [95% CI: 0.75, 1.33] (p = 0.969), indicating no significant difference between the two drugs. RMST analysis supported these findings, with adagrasib showing a consistently higher RMST in PFS at 6, 12, and 18 months. However, OS benefits converged over time, with adagrasib marginally surpassing sotorasib by the 18-month mark. Conclusions: This comprehensive analysis reveals that while adagrasib may offer a slight advantage in PFS, both drugs demonstrate comparable efficacy in OS for KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC. The subtle differences observed, particularly in PFS, could inform clinical decision-making, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment strategies. Future research should focus on long-term effects and identifying patient subgroups that may benefit more from one drug over the other. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In this single-center retrospective analysis of 101 patients with recurrent glioblastoma, we demonstrate the benefit of a multimodal treatment approach with normo-fractionated re-RT with combined alkylating chemotherapy after surgical resection. Additionally, questions of patient selection, treatment tolerability, and patterns of relapse are addressed. Multimodal Treatment with re-resection followed by re-irradiation in combination with alkylating chemotherapy achieved the best results, especially when a combination of two agents (TMZ and CCNU) is used. Treatment was tolerated well with little evidence of radionecrosis or hematological toxicity and mean overall survival was 11.3 months (mean progression free survival: 9.5 months). No influence of second-line chemotherapy on patterns of relapse was detected. Background: Glioblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in adults. Even after maximal safe resection and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, patients normally relapse after a few years or even months. Standard treatment for recurrent glioblastoma is not yet defined, with re-resection, re-irradiation, and systemic therapy playing key roles. Usually, re-irradiation is combined with concurrent chemotherapy, harnessing the radiosensitizing effects of alkylating agents. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 101 patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with re-irradiation was conducted, evaluating the survival impact of concurrent chemotherapy regimens, as well as prior resection. Patients were subcategorized according to concurrent chemotherapy (temozolomide vs. CCNU vs. combination of both vs. none) and details are given regarding treatment toxicity and patterns of relapse after first- and second-line treatment. Results: Patients were treated with normo-fractionated re-irradiation (with prescription dose of ~40 Gy to the PTV), resulting in a moderate cumulative EQD2 (~100 Gy). The mean overall survival was 11.3 months (33.5 months from initial diagnosis) and mean progression free survival was 9.5 months. Prior resection resulted in increased survival (p < 0.001), especially when gross total resection was achieved. Patients who received concurrent chemotherapy had significantly longer survival vs. no chemotherapy (p < 0.01), with the combination of CCNU and TMZ achieving the best results. Overall survival was significantly better in patients who received the CCNU + TMZ combination at any time during treatment (first or second line) vs. monotherapy only. The treatment of larger volumes (mean PTV size = 112.7 cm3) was safe and did not result in worse prognosis or increased demand for corticosteroids. Overall, the incidence of high-grade toxicity or sequential radionecrosis (5%) was reasonably low and treatment was tolerated well. While second-line chemotherapy did not seem to influence patterns of relapse, patients who received TMZ + CCNU as first-line treatment had a tendency towards better local control with more out-field recurrence. Conclusions: Normo-fractionated re-irradiation appears to be safe and is accompanied by good survival outcomes, even when applied to larger treatment volumes. Patients amenable to undergo re-resection and achieving concurrent systemic therapy with alkylating agents had better OS, especially when gross total resection was possible. Based on existing data and experiences reflected in this analysis, we advocate for a multimodal approach to recurrent glioblastoma with maximal safe re-resection and adjuvant second chemoradiation. The combination of TMZ and CCNU for patients with methylated MGMT promoter yielded the best results in the primary and recurrent situation (together with re-RT). Normo-fractionated RT enables the use of more generous margins and is tolerated well. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study focuses on extracellular vesicles (EVs) as potential novel biomarkers predicting the outcome of immunotherapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Firstly, we detected significantly smaller EVs in treatment responders in terms of overall survival. Secondly, a decrease in vesicle size during immunotherapy was related to a longer progression-free survival. Lastly, higher vesicle concentrations and lower zeta potentials were identified as a positive prognostic factor throughout treatment. Our data highlight the potential promising role of EVs as novel biomarkers, potentially helping to identify optimal candidates for checkpoint inhibitor-based treatments for patients with advanced HCC. Background and Aims: Treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab has been approved as one of the standards of care for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The median overall survival (OS) upon available treatments still remains below 2 years, urgently suggesting better stratification tools to identify ideal candidates for this treatment and potentially allowing personalized approaches. In this study, we evaluated the potential role of extracellular vesicles (EVs) as a novel biomarker in patients receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab for HCC. Methods: We characterized EVs in 212 longitudinal serum samples from an observational cohort of 53 individuals with advanced HCC, who started therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab at our center between January 2020 and March 2022. Results: In our cohort, the overall efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab was comparable to previously published phase III data. We detected significantly smaller EVs in treatment responders, while enlarged EVs were associated with significantly decreased efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in terms of OS. A decrease in vesicle size during immunotherapy was related to a longer progression-free survival (PFS). A univariate Cox regression analysis including various clinicopathological parameters (e.g., tumor stage, markers of inflammation, organ dysfunction, or tumor markers) revealed vesicle size as an independent prognostic marker in HCC patients receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Moreover, higher vesicle concentrations and lower zeta potentials were identified as a positive prognostic factor throughout treatment. Conclusions: Distinct EV characteristics such as vesicle size, concentration, and zeta potential represent promising novel biomarkers in patients with advanced HCC receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab, potentially helping to identify optimal candidates for checkpoint inhibitor-based treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The prognostic value of lymphovascular or perineural invasion in prostate cancer specimens regarding oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy is unclear. Within a contemporary study cohort of 822 prostate cancer patients, 78 (9%) exhibited lymphovascular invasion and 633 (77%) exhibited perineural invasion in RP specimens. In univariable Cox regression models, lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion were both associated with higher rates of biochemical recurrence (BCR). However, after multivariable adjustment for standard pathologic tumor characteristics, lymphovascular or perineural invasion was not found to be an independent predictor for BCR. These phenomes may be explained by the strong association between the Gleason Grade Group and pathologic tumor stage with lymphovascular as well as perineural invasion. Objective: The aim of this study was to test for the association between lymphovascular invasion or perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens and biochemical recurrence (BCR). Methods: Relying on a tertiary-care database, we identified prostate cancer patients treated with RP between January 2014 and June 2023. Of these, the majority underwent robotic-assisted RP (81%). Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and Cox regression models addressed BCR according to either lymphovascular invasion or perineural invasion in RP specimens. Additionally, the linear trend test assessed the association between the Gleason Grade Group or pathologic tumor stage and lymphovascular or perineural invasion. Results: Of 822 patients, 78 (9%) exhibited lymphovascular invasion and 633 (77%) exhibited perineural invasion in RP specimens. In survival analyses, the five-year BCR-free survival rates were 62% in patients with lymphovascular invasion vs. 70% in patients without lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.04) and 64% in patients with perineural invasion vs. 82% in patients without perineural invasion (p = 0.01). In univariable Cox regression models, lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval 1.01–2.47; p = 0.045) and perineural invasion (hazard ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.13–2.77; p = 0.013) were both associated with a higher BCR rate. After accounting for age at surgery, PSA value, pathologic tumor stage, Gleason Grade Group, lymph node invasion, positive surgical margin, surgical approach, and adjuvant radiation therapy, lymphovascular (p = 0.740) or perineural invasion (p = 0.341) were not significantly associated with a higher BCR since the Gleason Grade Group and pathologic tumor stage highly correlated with lymphovascular as well as perineural invasion. Conclusions: In univariable models, lymphovascular or perineural invasion is associated with BCR. After adjustment for standard pathologic tumor characteristics, lymphovascular or perineural invasion is not an independent predictor for BCR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Our study examined PD-L1 expression in advanced Thyroid Cancer (TC) and its relationship with histological subtypes, molecular mutations, and progression-free survival (PFS). Analyzing data from 176 patients with advanced TC, our study found significant variability in PD-L1 expression with Oncocytic Thyroid Cancer (OTC) and Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer (ATC) exhibiting the highest frequencies of PD-L1 expression, while Medullary TC (MTC) and Papillary TC Follicular Variant (PTCFV) did not show any PD-L1 expression. Notably, PD-L1 positivity correlated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in ATC and was associated with TP53 mutation. These findings suggest that PD-L1 expression, combined with genetic profiling could inform personalized immunotherapy strategies for aggressive forms of TC, emphasizing the need for further research to validate these biomarkers and enhance treatment efficacy. Background: Thyroid cancer (TC) remains a significant clinical challenge worldwide, with a subset of patients facing aggressive disease progression and therapeutic resistance. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have emerged as promising therapeutic approaches for various malignancies, yet their efficacy in TC remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to investigate PD-L1 expression in aggressive TC and its association with histological subtypes, molecular mutation, and progression-free survival. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients with advanced TC seen in two tertiary health care centers. Included in this study were patients with advanced TC with recurrence or progression on therapy for whom tumor molecular profiling and PD-L1 status were available. Kaplan–Meier estimators were utilized to analyze the progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with PD-L1 positive and negative status in Anaplastic TC (ATC) subgroup. Results: A total of 176 patients with advanced thyroid cancer were included (48.9% female). Of the patients, 13 had ATC, 11 Medullary TC (MTC), 81 Papillary TC Classic Variant (PTCCV), 20 Follicular TC (FTC), 8 Oncocytic TC (OTC), 10 Poorly Differentiated TC (PDTC), and 30 had the Papillary TC Follicular Variant (PTCFV). BRAF mutation was present in 41%, TERT in 30%, RAS in 19%, TP53 in 10%, and RET in 8.6% of patients. PD-L1 positivity was significantly different across different TC types and histological subtypes (p < 0.01): Patients with OTC had the highest frequency of PD-L1 positivity (71%), followed by ATC (69%), PTCCV (28.5%), and FTC (11%). Patients with MTC and PTCFV did not exhibit any PD-L1 positivity. TP53 mutation was positively associated with PD-L1 expression (21.6% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.03), and RAS mutation was negatively associated with PD-L1 expression (8.1% vs. 24.2% p = 0.04). Among patients with ATC, positive PD-L1 expression was associated with lower PFS (p = 0.002). Conclusions: PD-L1 expression varies across different TC types and histological subtypes and may be modulated by the mutational landscape. PD-L1 expression in ATC is associated with shorter PFS. Follow up studies are warranted to elucidate the molecular mechanism driving the observed differences in immune pathways, potentially paving the way for the development of more effective and personalized immune therapies for patients with aggressive TC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Adult medulloblastoma is an uncommon brain tumor, distinct from its pediatric counterpart in clinical presentation and molecular characteristics. Its management often relies on treatment strategies derived from pediatric cases due to limited research on adults. Our study evaluates the clinical and molecular characteristics of 53 adult patients treated at a single center and explores factors influencing survival outcomes. We found that the extent of surgery and disease stage significantly impacted survival, while molecular subtypes did not correlate with prognosis. High-risk patients exhibited poor outcomes, suggesting a need for more aggressive treatment approaches. Understanding these factors is crucial for improving survival rates in adult patients. Background/Objectives: Adult medulloblastoma is a rare entity, with management data extrapolated from pediatric medulloblastoma cases. We aim to report the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment outcome of a cohort of adult patients with medulloblastoma. Methods: Fifty-three patients aged ≥ 18 years with medulloblastoma treated at King Hussein Cancer Center between 2007 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' diseases were staged according to modified Chang's staging system. All patients received adjuvant craniospinal irradiation followed by a posterior fossa boost. Baseline disease characteristics, including molecular subgrouping, were tested as prognostic factors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by using univariate analysis. Results: Median follow-up was 70 months (range 37.5–104.5 months). Twenty-two tumors were of the SHH-activated subtype. Conversely, WNT-activated and group 4 tumors had three cases each. Only 37.7% of patients died. The mean 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS were 85% (75–95%), 74% (62–87%), and 50% (33–75%), respectively. Significant differences in OS were associated with the extent of surgery (p = 0.017), M stage (p = 0.009), and risk status (p < 0.001). Relapses were detected in 28.3% of cases. The 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year PFS were 81% (71–92%), 75% (63–88%), and 66% (52–83%), respectively. Significant differences in PFS were associated with the extent of surgery (p = 0.008) and risk status (p = 0.012). Molecular subgrouping did not correlate with OS or PFS. Conclusions: Our results revealed poor survival of patients with high-risk disease, which may necessitate the intensification of chemotherapy. Molecular subgrouping did not correlate with the outcome in this cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Rectal cancer (RC) is the third most common gastrointestinal malignancy, with a rising incidence, particularly among the population under 50 years old. Extramural venous invasion (EMVI) is defined as the presence of malignant cells in veins beyond the muscularis propria near the primary colorectal tumor. The aim of our retrospective study was to assess the prognostic value of separate pathological EMVI reporting in operative RC samples and to determine its relationship with standard pathohistological and surgical parameters among a selected cohort of RC patients from our institution. Finally, EMVI is proved not only to be a feature of aggressive tumor behavior, but also as a separate and independent parameter in patients with rectal cancer. The results we obtained strongly suggest the importance of separately reporting extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) from lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in daily practice, as well as that EMVI could be a good addition to TNM staging. Background/Objectives: Vascular invasion, especially extramural vascular invasion (EMVI), has emerged as a prognostic parameter for rectal cancer (RC) in recent years. Prediction of recurrence and metastasis development poses a significant challenge for oncologists, who need markers for prediction of adverse outcome. The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic significance of pathohistologically detected EMVI in untreated rectal cancer and its implications in separate reporting. Methods: We examined 100 untreated RC patients who underwent curative resection from January 2016 to June 2018 with a follow-up of 5 years. Patients were divided into equal EMVI− and EMVI+ groups based on histological re-examination of H&E-stained postoperative surgical samples. Results: The presence of EMVI within the selected cohort was significantly associated with female gender, T3/T4 and N1/N2 post-operative stages, positive lymph nodes, lymph node ratio LNR2 and LNR3 groups, abundant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, positive lympho-vascular invasion (LVI), perineural (PNI), and circumferential resection margin (CRM) (p < 0.05 in all tests). Within EMVI+ patients, local recurrences and/or metastases and death outcomes were more frequent events (p = 0.029 and p = 0.035, respectively), while survival analyses revealed that EMVI+ patients had significantly shorter overall survival (OS, p = 0.040) and disease-free survival (DFS, p = 0.028). Concerning LVI, differences in OS between LVI+ and LVI− patients were not statistically significant (p = 0.068), while LVI+ patients had significantly shorter DFS (p = 0.024). Moreover, univariate COX regression analysis demonstrated the negative impact of EMVI on OS (HR: 2.053, 95% CI: 1.015–4.152; p = 0.045) and DFS (HR: 2.106, 95% CI: 1.066–4.870; p = 0.038), which was not the case for LVI + RC patients. Conclusions: The obtained results strongly suggest the significance of separate reporting of EMVI from lympho-vascular invasion, as it is potentially a surrogate marker for adverse prognosis and outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study examined the real-world effectiveness of osimertinib, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, on EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. Osimertinib has shown promising results in clinical trials, but this research study looked at how it performs in real-world settings, where patients may have different characteristics than those typically included in trials. This study reviewed data from over 600 patients treated with osimertinib, either as their first (L1) or second metastatic line (L2) of treatment. The results showed that patients who took osimertinib as L1 experienced a median progression-free survival of 12.4 months, compared to 7.4 months for those treated in L2. The presence of brain metastases was associated with a poorer prognosis. Overall survival rates were lower than those reported in clinical trials, likely due to differences in patient conditions, such as older age and worse overall health. This study highlights the challenges of applying trial results to everyday medical practice and emphasizes the need for tailored treatment approaches for patients with advanced lung cancer. Background: Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), demonstrated superior efficacy over first-generation TKIs in the FLAURA trial, resulting in its approval as first-line therapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the real-world application of these trial results requires an evaluation of sequential therapeutic strategies. Methods: This retrospective, non-interventional study utilized data from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) platform, which includes information on patients treated for lung cancer since 2015. Out of 39,974 patients in the database, 624 patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC treated with osimertinib as first-line (L1, n = 198) or second-line (L2, n = 426) treatment after first- or second-generation TKIs (n = 1262) were identified. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment strategies, and disease progression were examined. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional-hazards models. Results: In the study population (n = 624), 73.4% were female, with a median age of 70 years (range 28–93). Brain metastases at the start of osimertinib treatment were observed in 282 patients. ECOG PS-2 was reported in 29.4% of patients. The T790M mutation in exon 20 was identified in 257/426 patients (60.3%) receiving osimertinib in L2. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months (95% CI [10.7–14.7]) for L1 and 7.4 months (95% CI [6.2–8.7]) for L2. Median overall survival (OS) from advanced diagnosis was 28.5 months (95% CI [26.3–38.7]) for osimertinib L1 and 29.9 months (95% CI [28.6–31.8]) for osimertinib L2 (HR = 0.93; 95% CI [0.75–1.16]; p = 0.50). For L1, median OS was 27.1 months (95% CI [22.0–30.2]) for patients with cerebral metastases and 38.7 months (95% CI [26.3–52.8]) for those without (HR = 0.73; 95% CI [0.48–1.11]; p = 0.15). Discussion: Patients in the real-world ESME database exhibited a poorer prognosis compared to those in the FLAURA trial. The presence of cerebral metastases at diagnosis worsens the prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: We studied real-world patient trends and cancer survival in adult patients in a European registry, EUMelaReg. We included 200 patients with stage III melanoma with lymph node involvement who had complete resection and received adjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab. Patients initiated treatment with adjuvant pembrolizumab from 1 January 2019 to 17 April 2021 with a median follow-up of 16.5 months. Comparison with previously published real-world data showed that patients were older and more likely to have stage IIIC and IIID disease than those in the Keynote 054 clinical trial. Background: Although data on patients treated with pembrolizumab are available from clinical trials and single-country real-world reports, to our knowledge no multi-country real-world studies have investigated the use of pembrolizumab as an adjuvant treatment for stage III melanoma. Methods: We used the European Melanoma Registry (EUMelaReg), a disease entity-based registry specific for melanoma, to examine treatment and outcomes for adult patients with stage III melanoma with lymph node involvement who had complete resection and received adjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab. The primary objectives were to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of the included patients as well as time on adjuvant pembrolizumab treatment (TOT), real-world recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) from adjuvant pembrolizumab initiation. Secondary objectives were time to next treatment (TTNT) after adjuvant use of pembrolizumab, next-line therapy for stage III and unresectable stage IV melanoma and overall survival (OS) from initiation of pembrolizumab. Results: Patients were stratified according to age, sex, BRAF status, number of positive lymph nodes and disease substage. Median TOT was 11.1 (9.2–11.5) months, median RFS was 29.6 [18.7–not reached (NR)] months and median DMFS was 32.4 (22.7–NR) months. TTNT was 29.9 (22.2–NR) months, while median OS was not reached. Conclusions: The results of this study offer insights into the real-world use of pembrolizumab as an adjuvant therapy for melanoma in Europe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a rising incidence and poor prognosis due to late diagnosis and limited treatments. Currently, treatment is based solely on TNM staging, without considering molecular tumor characterization. In the present study, we validated a combined amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) and high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) technique for detecting mutations in codon 12 of KRAS in PDAC tumor and plasma samples and assessed its prognostic value. We included 88 newly diagnosed PDAC patients, treated with either surgery, chemotherapy, or best supportive treatment only. Both tumor and plasma samples were analyzed, and the most frequent mutations were G12D (36%) and G12V (25%). KRAS mutations G12D and/or G12C in tumors and plasma were associated with lower progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) independently of disease stage or treatment performed. ARMS–HRMA offers a rapid, cost-effective method for detecting KRAS mutations and can aid in prognosis and treatment decisions. Background/Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) incidence is rising, and prognosis remains poor due to late diagnosis and limited effective therapies. Currently, patients are treated based on TNM staging, without molecular tumor characterization. This study aimed to validate a technique that combines the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) with high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) for detecting mutations in codon 12 of KRAS in tumor and plasma, and to assess its prognostic value. Methods: Prospective study including patients with newly diagnosed PDAC with tumor and plasma samples collected before treatment. Mutations in codon 12 of KRAS (G12D, G12V, G12C, and G12R) were detected using ARMS–HRMA and compared to Sanger sequencing (SS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of these mutations. Results: A total of 88 patients, 93% with ECOG-PS 0–1, 57% with resectable disease. ARMS–HRMA technique showed a higher sensitivity than SS, both in tumor and plasma (77% vs. 51%; 25 vs. 0%, respectively). The most frequent mutation was G12D (n = 32, 36%), followed by G12V (n = 22, 25%). On multivariate analysis, patients with G12D and/or G12C mutations, either in tumor or plasma, had lower PFS (HR 1.792, 95% CI 1.061–3.028, p = 0.029; HR 2.081, 95% CI 1.014–4.272, p = 0.046, respectively) and lower OS (HR 1.757, 95% CI 1.013–3.049, p = 0.045; HR 2.229, 95% CI 1.082–4.594, p = 0.030, respectively). Conclusions: ARMS–HRMA is a rapid and cost-effective method for detecting KRAS mutations in PDAC patients, offering the potential for stratifying prognosis and guiding treatment decisions. The presence of G12D and G12C mutations in both tumor and plasma is associated with a poorer prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Due to a shortage of reliable biomarkers for predicting outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Ate/Bev), we assessed the impact of early changes in cytokine levels on the clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients. We prospectively enrolled 32 patients, analyzing changes in IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, IFN-γ, and TNF-α levels from blood samples collected before the first and second Ate/Bev treatments. Patients with increased IL-10, IL-17, and TNF-α levels demonstrated significantly better survival and marginally improved progression-free survival compared to those with decreased cytokine levels. Additionally, a positive correlation was found between changes in IL-10 and TNF-α levels. Multivariable analysis confirmed that increases in these cytokines are significant predictors of improved survival (p = 0.005). Early increases in IL-10 and TNF-α levels post-Ate/Bev treatment may thus serve as effective biomarkers for clinical outcomes in advanced HCC patients. Background/Objectives: Reliable biomarkers for predicting outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Ate/Bev) are still lacking. Cytokines, which play a crucial role in immune regulation and HCC progression, have potential as predictive markers, but data supporting their use are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of early changes in cytokine levels on the clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 32 advanced HCC patients, collecting blood samples before the first and second Ate/Bev treatments. These samples were analyzed for IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, IFN-γ, and TNF-α levels to assess changes post-treatment. The primary outcome was overall survival, with a secondary focus on progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months. Results: The mean age of the participants was 64.2 years, with the majority being male (93.8%). Patients showing increased IL-10, IL-17, and TNF-α levels had significantly better survival (p < 0.05) and marginally improved PFS compared to those with decreased cytokine levels. Interestingly, a positive correlation was noted between changes in IL-10 and TNF-α levels (p = 0.009). Furthermore, a multivariable analysis revealed that increased levels of IL-10 and TNF-α were significant predictors of enhanced survival (hazard ratio, 0.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.01–0.46; p = 0.005). Conclusions: An early increases in IL-10 and TNF-α after Ate/Bev treatment may serve as effective biomarkers for clinical outcomes in advanced HCC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Almost one in five patients with breast cancer have an aggressive subtype that expresses Human Epidermal Growth Factor-2 (HER2) receptor. The introduction of anti-HER2 therapy, like trastuzumab and pertuzumab, has dramatically improved treatment outcomes. However, such therapy is lengthy, costly, and can result in substantial cardiac toxicities. In this review, we discuss ways to de-escalate anti-HER2 therapy by shortening the treatment course to less than the 12-month standard, or minimizing companion chemotherapy. New molecular tools are emerging that should help physicians select which patients with HER2-positive breast cancer benefit most from aggressive and lengthy treatment regimens utilizing single or dual anti-HER2 therapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Almost one-fifth of breast cancer cases express Human Epidermal Growth Factor-2 (HER2), and such expression is associated with highly proliferative tumors and poor prognosis. The introduction of anti-HER2 therapies has dramatically changed the natural course of this aggressive subtype of breast cancer. However, anti-HER2 therapy can be associated with substantial toxicities, mostly cardiac, and high cost. Over the past few years, there has been growing interest in de-escalation of anti-HER2 therapies to minimize adverse events and healthcare costs, while maintaining the efficacy of treatment. Data from clinical observations and single-arm studies have eluted to the minimal impact of anti-HER2 therapy in low-risk patients, like those with node-negative and small tumors. Though single-arm, the APT trial, in which patients with node-negative, small tumors received single-agent paclitaxel for 12 cycles plus trastuzumab for 1 year, was a practice-changing study. Several other recently published studies, like the PERSEPHONE trial, have shown more convincing data that 6 months of trastuzumab is not inferior to 12 months, in terms of disease-free survival (DFS), suggesting that de-escalating strategies with shorter treatment may be appropriate for some low-risk patients. Other de-escalating strategies involved an adaptive, response-directed approach, and personalized therapy that depends on tumor genomic profiling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Previous studies have demonstrated that the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is significantly associated with favorable efficacy and prognosis in patients with cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen. However, few studies have investigated this association in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Herein, we evaluated the relationship of irAEs with tumor response and survival in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent ESCC treated with second- or later-line nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, monotherapy. We observed that the occurrence of mild (grade 1/2) irAEs during the entire period, as well as within 8 weeks of nivolumab initiation, was significantly associated with tumor response and survival following nivolumab monotherapy. Thus, mild irAEs may serve as predictive markers for the response and prognosis of patients with ESCC treated with ICIs. Background: Patients across various cancers who develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs) post-immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment tend to experience better tumor response and survival than those who do not. However, studies regarding this association in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are limited. Methods: We assessed the relationship of irAEs with tumor response and survival in 82 consecutive patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent ESCC treated with second- or later-line nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, monotherapy. Results: We observed irAEs in 24 (29.3%) patients, with the overall response and disease control rates in the irAE-positive group being significantly better than those in the irAE-negative group (both p < 0.0001). During the entire period and within 8 weeks of nivolumab initiation, progression-free and overall survivals (PFS and OS, respectively) were significantly better in patients with grade1/2 irAEs than in those without. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated grade1/2 irAEs during the entire period and within 8 weeks as independent covariates for PFS (entire period: hazard ratio [HR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16–0.49, p < 0.001; within 8 weeks: HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23–0.93, p = 0.03) and OS (entire period: HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13–0.44, p < 0.001; within 8 weeks: HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18–0.92, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Grade1/2 irAEs during the entire treatment period and within 8 weeks of nivolumab initiation were significantly associated with improved tumor response and survival in patients with advanced ESCC treated with nivolumab monotherapy. Therefore, mild irAEs may be predictive markers for the response and prognosis of ESCC following ICI treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study explored the current practices in the real world for grade 2 glioma, an uncommon primary brain cancer. Leveraging the prospective BRAIN registry, this study demonstrates that whilst sequential radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve progression-free survival in high-risk grade 2 glioma, the majority of patients are observed following surgery. In high-risk patients who are observed, 61% remain progression-free at 12 months, with 10% being progression-free at 5 years. This clinically meaningful progression-free survival suggests that validated biomarkers beyond the usual definition of high-risk are required to better inform patient management. Factors contributing to decision-making are underway. Background: Grade-2 gliomas (G2-glioma) are uncommon. In 2016, RTOG9802 established the addition of chemotherapy after radiation (CRT) as a new standard of care for patients with high-risk G2-glioma, defined as subtotal resection or age ≥40 yrs. Here, we report current practices using real-world data. Methods: Patients diagnosed with G2-glioma from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2022 were identified in BRAIN, a prospective clinical registry collecting data on patients with brain tumours. High- and low-risk were defined as per RTOG9802. Two time periods, January 2016–December 2019 (TP1) and January 2020–December 2022 (TP2), were defined. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: 224 patients were identified. Overall, 38 (17%) were low-risk, with 35 (91%) observed without further treatment. A total of 186 (83%) were high-risk, with 96 (52%) observed, 63 (34%) receiving CRT, and 19 (10%) receiving radiation. Over time, CRT use increased (TP1 vs. TP2: 22% vs. 36%, p = 0.004), and the rate of biopsy (TP1 vs. TP2: 35% vs. 20%, p = 0.02) and radiotherapy alone (TP1 vs. TP2: 14% vs. 4%, p = 0.01) decreased. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in high-risk patients who received CRT (NR) over observation (39 months) (HR 0.49, p = 0.007). In high-risk patients who were observed, 59 (61%) were progression-free at 12 months and 10 (10%) at 5 years. OS data remains immature. Conclusion: Congruent with RTOG9802, real-world BRAIN data shows CRT is associated with improved PFS compared to observation in high-risk G2-glioma. Whilst CRT use has increased over time, observation after surgery remains the most common strategy, with some high-risk patients achieving clinically meaningful PFS. Validated biomarkers are urgently required to better inform patient management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Radioligand therapy (RLT) with the use of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and [90Y]Y-DOTA-TATE is a subsequent line of the neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) treatment. A total of 127 patients with progressive NENs underwent 4 courses of RLT. Changes in laboratory parameters, adverse events (AEs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RLT caused changes in laboratory parameters regarding kidney and bone marrow function, as well as glucose concentration. Nevertheless, RLT appeared to be a safe method of NEN treatment with a low number of AEs and a high percentage of survival rate in a long-term observation. Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are neoplastic tumors developing in every part of the body, mainly in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. Their treatment involves the surgical removal of the tumor and its metastasis, long-acting somatostatin analogs, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and radioligand therapy (RLT). Materials and Methods: A total of 127 patients with progressive neuroendocrine neoplasms underwent RLT—4 courses, administered every 10 weeks—with the use of 7.4 GBq [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE or tandem therapy with 1.85 GBq [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and 1.85 GBq [90Y]Y-DOTA-TATE. Assessment of short- and long-term complications, as well as the calculation of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed. Results: RLT caused a statistically but not clinically significant decrease in blood morphology parameters during both short- and long-term observations. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) significantly decreased only in a long-term observation after RLT; however, it was clinically acceptable. Computed predictions of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) indicated that five years post-RLT, there is a 74% chance of patients surviving, with only a 58.5% likelihood of disease progression. Conclusions: Computed predictions of PFS and OS confirmed treatment efficiency and good patient survival. RLT should be considered a safe and reliable line of treatment for patients with progressive NENs as it causes only a low number of low-grade adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The current real-world study suggests that important differences exist in patients progressing to mCRPC. Specifically, we found that a proportion of over 20% of patients progress without a PSA level rise, emphasizing the importance of regular staging intervals. Moreover, we found that patients with worse PSA responses are at higher risk for biochemical progression, emphasizing the need for regular PSA check-ups and kinetic measurements. However, no differences in PFS and OS outcomes between these patients were observed. Finally, staging with PSMA-PET/CT might provide better PFS and OS, relative to conventionally staged mCRPC patients. However, this observation may be substantially influenced by the detection of earlier disease progression and the possibility of treatment in patients with a lower metastatic burden, as well as more contemporary patients with better treatment options. Background/Objectives: Progression to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is defined either biochemically, radiographically or both. Moreover, staging for mCRPC can be performed either conventionally or with molecular imaging such as prostate-specific membrane antigen computer tomography (PSMA-PET/CT). Methods: We relied on the Frankfurt Metastatic Cancer Database of the Prostate (FRAMCAP) database to compare progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes regarding the cause of castration resistance and the staging modality used. Results: Overall, 35% progressed to mCRPC biochemically vs. 23% radiographically vs. 42% biochemically + radiographically. The PSA nadir in mHSPC (1.4 vs. 0.4 vs. 0.8 ng/mL) and PSA level at mCRPC progression (15 vs. 2 vs. 21 ng/mL, both p ≤ 0.01) were significantly higher for biochemical vs. radiographic vs. both progressed patients. In PFS and OS analyses, no significant differences were observed among all three compared groups. In the comparison of the staging used for progression to mCRPC, 67% received conventional vs. 33% PSMA-PET/CT, with higher metastatic burden in mHSPC and osseous lesions in mCRPC for conventionally staged patients (both p < 0.01). In PFS (15.3 vs. 10.1 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.75) and OS analyses (52.6 vs. 34.3 months, HR: 0.61, both p < 0.05), PSMA-PET/CT harbored better prognosis; however, this did not hold after multivariable adjustment. Similar results were observed for further analyses in second- and third-line mCRPC or patients with a PSA level of ≥2 ng/mL. Conclusions: The cause of progression to mCRPC seems not to influence cancer-control outcomes, despite important baseline tumor characteristic differences. The PSMA-PET/CT staging modality might be associated with better PFS and OS outcomes, possibly due to its more sensitive detection of progression or new metastatic lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study evaluated the effect of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with complete or near-complete cytoreduction on naïve ovarian cancer women; 5- and 10-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival rates were significantly higher in these patients. These patients were also 67% less likely to die from any cause, 75% less likely to die from cancer, and 46% less likely to develop recurrence compared to patients that were treated with cytoreductive surgery alone. These favorable results highlight the need for future randomized controlled trials in order to further determine the effect of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Purpose: The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of naïve ovarian cancer women undergoing complete or near-complete cytoreduction by assessing the overall survival, the disease-specific survival, and the disease-free survival. The secondary objective is the identification of prognostic indicators of survival and recurrence of these patients. Patients—Methods: Retrospective study of treatment in naïve women with locally advanced ovarian cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC and compared with those who were treated with cytoreduction alone. Clinicopathologic variables were correlated to overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival using Kaplan–Meier method, and the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: 5- and 10-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival rates were significantly higher in patients treated with CRS and HIPEC. These patients were 67% less likely to die from any cause (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR = 0.33, p = 0.001), 75% less likely to die from cancer (aHR = 0.25, p = 0.003), and 46% less likely to develop recurrence (aHR = 0.54, p = 0.041) compared to patients treated with CRS alone. Moreover, the poor performance status (aHR = 2.96, p < 0.001), the serous carcinomas (aHR = 0.14, p = 0.007), and the morbidity (aHR = 6.87, p < 0.001) were identified as independent indicators of poor overall survival. The degree of differentiation (aHR = 8.64, p = 0.003) was identified as the independent indicator of disease-specific survival (aHR = 4.13, p = 0.002), while the extent of peritoneal carcinomatosis (aHR = 2.32, p < 0.001) as the independent indicator of disease-free survival. Conclusions: Treatment in naïve patients with locally advanced ovarian cancer undergoing CRS plus HIPEC appears to have improved overall, disease-specific, and disease-free survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Definitive radiochemotherapy represents a well-established and proven treatment option for locally advanced cervical cancer. The Gyn GEC-ESTRO (GGE) provides a protocol for the method and administration of the associated brachytherapy, in which restrictions for target volumes and organs at risk are established through several studies. This study aims to validate the results of the internal treatment protocol and compare them with the GGE recommendations. A sample of 48 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated from 2013 to 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. The GGE target volumes were contoured, evaluated, and then compared with patients' oncologic outcome, as well as bladder and rectal toxicities. The use of MRI during brachytherapy was observed to have a positive effect on survival times in this study. Adherence to the GGE recommendations may also improve local tumor control and time-to-event endpoints, which were comparable to those of other studies. A realistic representation of patient treatment in a radiation oncology center without constant access to MRI for brachytherapy planning was obtained. Background: This study aims to evaluate patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who underwent definitive radiochemotherapy, including brachytherapy, at the University Hospital of Muenster (UKM), focusing on target volume coverage, oncologic outcome parameters, and organs at risk (OAR) toxicities. Results are compared with the Gyn GEC-ESTRO (GGE) recommendations. Methods: Of a cohort of 48 patients, treated between 2013 and 2023, the physical radiation treatment planning with application of CT and MRI and oncologic follow-up data was analyzed. Target volume structures, comprising the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), intermediate-risk clinical target volume (IR-CTV), Point A, and corresponding EQD2(α/β=10) doses were determined. Endpoints included local tumor control, overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Total OAR (D2cc) EQD2(α/β=3) doses were correlated with adverse events defined by CTCAE v5.0 and LENT-SOMA criteria. Results: Median follow-up was 58.0 months (95% CI [27.6, 88.4]). FIGO stage I was present in 7 (15%) patients, II in 13 (27%), and III in 28 (58%) patients. A total of 38 (79%) patients showed a complete remission 3 months after treatment. The 5-year event-free rate was 67.4% (95% CI [49.3, 80.3]) for OS, 77.0% (95% CI [56.7, 88.6]) for RFS and 68.1% (95% CI [49.7, 80.9]) for PFS. Incomplete radiation treatment and advanced tumor stages led to worse outcomes. Meeting Point A GGE recommendations increased chances for complete remission and could decrease chances of an event occurring for OS, PFS, and RFS. Compliance with GGE recommendations lowered the chances of OAR toxicity occurring. Conclusions: MRI-based target volume definition for brachytherapy in cervical cancer may improve patients' OS, PFS, and RFS. Time-to-event endpoints are consistent with comparable studies, and adherence to current ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines is endorsed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Many patients diagnosed with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. As many as 20% of patients with this diagnosis will present with metastasis to the peritoneal cavity which portends a significantly worse prognosis than solid organ metastasis alone. There is little to no evidence to guide treatment algorithms given the rarity of this disease. Surgical cytoreduction has been found to improve symptoms related to disease burden, though an understanding of the optimal cytoreductive strategies to offer the greatest benefit to most patients is lacking. While the current body of literature pertaining to the systemic treatment of the solid organ metastasis of this disease is more robust, it largely excludes patients with peritoneal metastasis. We provide a review of the current literature which is used to guide these management strategies and offer insight into the knowledge gaps that exist. Peritoneal metastasis in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors poses a significant clinical challenge, with limited data guiding management strategies. We review the existing literature on surgical and systemic treatment modalities for peritoneal metastasis from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surgical interventions, including cytoreductive surgery, have shown promise in improving symptom control and overall survival—particularly in cases in which 70% cytoreduction can be achieved. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy remains controversial due to a paucity of high-level evidence and a lack of consensus for routine use. The use of systemic therapy in the setting of peritoneal metastasis from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is extrapolated from high-quality evidence for its use in the setting of the solid organ metastasis of this disease. The use of somatostatin analogs for symptom control and some antiproliferative effects is supported by large clinical trials. Additional strong evidence exists for the use of interferon-alpha, everolimus, and sunitinib, particularly in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy may be used in select cases, though as an emerging treatment modality, the optimal sequence of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy within the existing algorithms is unknown. Significant gaps in understanding and standardized management exist, particularly for those patients presenting with peritoneal metastasis, and targeted research to optimize outcomes in this population is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The anticancer activity of PARP inhibitors in pancreatic cancer with mutations in HRR genes other than BRCA and PALB2 remains inconclusive. The authors retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer harboring pathogenic germline and/or somatic HRR mutations who were treated with PARP inhibitors. PARP inhibitors may be considered for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer harboring pathogenic alterations of BRCA who cannot tolerate standard chemotherapy. Maintenance PARP inhibitor therapy may be considered in selected patients with non-BRCA and non-PALB2 HRR mutations. Background: Limited data are available regarding the anticancer activity of PARP inhibitors (PARPis) in pancreatic cancer with mutations in HRR genes other than BRCA and PALB2. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 48 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer harboring pathogenic germline and/or somatic HRR mutations who were treated with PARPis. Results: Thirty patients had germline (g)HRR mutations only, twelve had somatic (s)HRR mutations only, and six had concomitant gHRR and sHRR mutations. The objective response rate (ORR) was 22%. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) were 6.9 and 11.5 months, respectively. Five patients received olaparib in the front-line setting due to borderline performance status. Their ORR was 20%, and their mPFS and mOS were both 11.3 months. The ORR was higher in patients with BRCA or PALB2 mutations (germline or somatic) than in those with non-BRCA/PALB2 mutations. Patients with somatic non-BRCA/PALB2 variants had a shorter mPFS. Patients with concomitant gHRR/sHRR mutations or gHRR mutations alone had a significantly longer mPFS than those with sHRR mutations only. Conclusions: PARP inhibitors may be considered for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer harboring pathogenic alterations of BRCA who cannot tolerate standard chemotherapy. Maintenance PARPis can be considered in selected patients with non-BRCA/non-PALB2 HRR mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Intracavitary chemotherapy by Carmustine wafer implantation represents a therapeutic option for the management of high-grade gliomas both at diagnosis and at progression. However, this strategy is very controversial as it can lead to potential complications and previous studies have raised doubts regarding its efficacy in terms of oncological outcomes. Moreover, the results associated with Carmustine wafer implantation have been more frequently studied at diagnosis than at progression. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to precisely identify the predictors of complications and onco-functional outcomes in a series of 53 patients with a high-grade glioma surgically managed at progression with implantation of Carmustine wafers. These analyses will help to better identify and select the patients who are the best candidates to receive Carmustine wafers at progression and to guide intraoperative and postoperative management. Background/Objectives: The aim was to determine the complication rate and the predictors of complications and survival in high-grade glioma surgically managed at progression with implantation of Carmustine wafers. Methods: A retrospective series of 53 consecutive patients operated on between 2017 and 2022 was built. Results: The median age was 55 ± 10.9 years. The rates of global and infectious complications were 35.8% and 18.9%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, patients with a preoperative neurological deficit were more prone to develop a postoperative complication (HR = 5.35 95% CI 1.49–19.26, p = 0.01). No predictor of infectious complication was identified. In the grade 4 glioma subgroup (n = 44), progression-free and overall survival (calculated starting from the reresection) reached 3.95 months, 95% CI 2.92–5.21 and 11.51 months, 95% CI 9.11–17.18, respectively. Preoperative KPS > 80% (HR = 0.97 95% CI 0.93–0.99, p = 0.04), Gross Total Resection (HR = 0.38 95% CI 0.18–0.80, p = 0.01), and 3-month postoperative KPS > 80% (HR = 0.35 95% CI 0.17–0.72, p = 0.004) were predictors of prolonged overall survival. Conclusions: Surgical resection is a relevant option in high-grade gliomas at progression, especially in patients with a preoperative KPS > 80%, without preoperative neurological deficit, and amenable to complete resection. In patients elected for surgery, Carmustine wafer implantation is associated with a high rate of complications. It is consequently critical to closely monitor the patients for whom this option is chosen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Systemic therapy is the primary treatment option for patients diagnosed with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of our retrospective study is to assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of two treatment regimens in the first-line setting: lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Our findings indicate that both regimens show similar overall survival, progression-free survival, and acceptable safety profiles in real-world conditions. Background: The combination of anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the management of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). While an early-phase study demonstrated promising outcomes for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (L+P) in treating uHCC, the LEAP-002 trial did not meet its primary endpoint. However, the comparative efficacy between L+P and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) as first-line treatment remains a topic of uncertainty. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of L+P in contrast to A+B among patients diagnosed with uHCC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of enrolled patients with uHCC who received L+P or A+B as initial systemic treatment at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from June 2019 to December 2022. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) by modified RECIST were compared. Results: 121 patients were recruited, with 37 receiving L+P and 84 receiving A+B. Among them, 95 (78.5%) patients were BCLC stage C, and 99 (81.8%) patients had viral etiology for HCC, predominantly chronic HBV (68.6%). Both the L+P and the A+B groups demonstrated comparable OS (18.2 months versus 14.6 months, p = 0.35) and PFS (7.3 months versus 8.9 months, p = 0.75). The ORR and DCR were similar. After propensity score matching, the results remained consistent between the matched patients. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred in 30 (81.1%) in the L+P group and 62 (73.8%) in the A+B group. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that L+P and A+B exhibit comparable efficacy and safety profiles in real-world settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This article herein presented explores the role of the epigenetic marker H3K27me3 in tumors of the Central Nervous System, highlighting its importance for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. H3K27me3 involves the trimethylation of lysine 27 on the histone H3 protein, which is essential for regulating gene activity and maintaining chromatin structure. A reduction in H3K27me3 levels is commonly seen in CNS tumors such as diffuse midline gliomas and meningiomas and is associated with more aggressive tumor behavior and a worse prognosis. This article emphasizes the utility of H3K27me3 loss in tumor diagnosis, prognosis, and the advancement of targeted therapies. Central nervous system (CNS) tumors represent a formidable clinical challenge due to their molecular complexity and varied prognostic outcomes. This review delves into the pivotal role of the epigenetic marker H3K27me3 in the development and treatment of CNS tumors. H3K27me3, specifically the trimethylation of lysine 27 on the histone H3 protein, plays a crucial role in regulating gene expression and maintaining chromatin architecture (e.g., in X-chromosome inactivation). Notably, a reduction in H3K27me3 levels, frequently tied to mutations in the H3 gene family such as H3F3A and HIST1H3B, is evident in diverse brain tumor variants, including the diffuse midline glioma characterized by the H3K27M mutation and certain pediatric high-grade gliomas. The loss of H3K27me3 has been linked to more aggressive behavior in meningiomas, with the trimethylation loss associated with significantly shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) among grade 2 meningiomas, albeit not within grade 1 tumors. Pediatric posterior fossa ependymomas characterized by a lowered H3K27me3 and DNA hypomethylation exhibit poor prognosis, underscoring the prognostic significance of these epigenetic alterations in CNS tumors. Comprehending the role of H3K27me3 in CNS tumors is vital for advancing diagnostic tools and therapeutic interventions, with the goal of enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life. This review underscores the importance of ongoing investigations into H3K27me to refine and optimize management strategies for CNS tumors, paving the way for improved personalized medicine practices in oncology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The pathologic response after neoadjuvant radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk was evaluated using the EORTC-STBSG response score. The median percentages of viable cells, necrosis and fibrosis/hyalinization were 20%, 11% and 40%, respectively. A pathologic complete response, defined as ≤5% viable tumor cells, was achieved in 25% of cases. Local recurrence occurred in 33% of cases, with a significantly higher rate of 64% after R1 excision compared to 22% after R0 resection. Distant metastases were observed in 42% of patients, primarily in the lungs. The local recurrence free survival, distant metastasis free survival and overall survival rates were 65%, 54%, and 67% at 3-years, respectively. A correlation between tumor histological subtype, size and grade with outcome was observed. While the EORTC-STBSG response score did not correlate with clinical outcomes, resection specimens with ≤5% viable tumor cells were linked to improved outcomes. Background/Objectives: The relationship between pathologic findings in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after neoadjuvant treatment and oncological outcomes remains uncertain due to varying evaluation methods and cut-off values. This study aims to assess pathologic findings after neoadjuvant radiotherapy in STS using the EORTC-STBSG response score and evaluate its prognostic value. Methods: Clinical and outcome data from 44 patients were reviewed. Resected specimens were re-evaluated to measure viable cells, necrosis, fibrosis, and hyalinization. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used for univariate and multivariate analyses to correlate outcomes with pathologic response. Results: The median percentages of viable cells, necrosis, and fibrosis/hyalinization were 20%, 11%, and 40%, respectively. A pathologic complete response (pCR), defined as ≤5% viable cells, was achieved in 25% of cases. Local recurrence occurred in 33% of cases, with a significantly higher rate of 64% after R1 resection compared to 22% after R0 resection. Distant metastases were observed in 42% of patients, primarily in the lungs. The 3-year rates for LRFS, DMFS, and OS were 65%, 54%, and 67%, respectively. A correlation between outcomes and tumor size, grade and histological subtype was observed. Classifying pathologic response by the EORTC-STBSG score failed to show an association with outcomes. Patients achieving pCR showed lower risk of LR and improved OS. Conclusions: While the EORTC-STBSG score did not show a prognostic value, resection specimens with ≤5% viable cells were linked to improved LRFS and OS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study explores the effectiveness and safety of a common breast cancer treatment in elderly patients, a group often overlooked in clinical trials. Specifically, it focuses on using CDK4/6 inhibitors with hormone therapy for treating metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer in patients aged 70 and older. This research aims to understand how well this treatment works and how tolerable it is for this vulnerable population, which faces unique challenges due to age and other health conditions. The results of this study may provide valuable insights for clinicians, enabling more informed treatment decisions which optimize therapeutic outcomes and enhance the quality of life for elderly patients with breast cancer. Background: Metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer is commonly treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy. However, the efficacy and safety of this approach in elderly patients (≥70 years) remain unclear, particularly in the context of real-world clinical practice. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and tolerability of CDK4/6 inhibitor treatments in this fragile population, which is often under-represented in randomized clinical trials. Patients and methods: This retrospective multicenter study included elderly patients with metastatic HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer receiving first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints focused on the overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability, considering variables such as tumor subtype, age, comorbidities, and treatment specifics. Results: The median PFS and OS were slightly lower than those reported in clinical trials, reflecting the inclusion of a more fragile population. The luminal B subtype was linked to a poorer PFS, while other factors like age, BMI, and ECOG status did not significantly affect the outcomes. A safety analysis indicated a higher incidence of grade 3 or higher toxicities, especially in frail patients, leading to dose reductions. Despite these challenges, CDK4/6 inhibitors were generally well-tolerated, allowing most patients to continue therapy. Conclusions: CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy are effective in elderly patients with metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer, though careful management is crucial to balance efficacy and minimize adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study compared 15 × 2.633 Gy over three weeks to 20 × 2.0 Gy over four weeks for malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) in patients with favorable survival prognoses not receiving upfront neurosurgery. After a propensity score adjustment of the Cox and logistic regression models, no significant differences were observed regarding local progression-free survival (LPFS), overall survival (OS), and post-treatment ambulatory status. A trend (p = 0.073) was found in favor of 15 × 2.633 Gy regarding improvement of motor function. Considering the limitations of our study, 15 × 2.633 Gy may be preferable for patients with MSCC with favorable prognosis. Many patients with malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) who are not candidates for neurosurgery receive radiotherapy alone. This study compared 15 × 2.633 Gy over three weeks to 20 × 2.0 Gy over four weeks in patients with favorable survival prognoses. The outcomes of 34 patients treated with 15 × 2.633 Gy (equivalent dose 41.6 Gy10) in the RAMSES-01 trial were compared to 239 patients from an existing database receiving 20 × 2.0 Gy using propensity-score-adjusted Cox and logistic regression models. All patients had favorable survival prognoses. Endpoints included local progression-free survival (LPFS), improvement of motor function, post-treatment ambulatory status, and overall survival (OS). After propensity score adjustment, the 12-month rates of LPFS and OS were 98.1% (RAMSES-01 cohort) vs. 91.6% (p = 0.265) and 79.1% vs. 82.2% (p = 0.704), respectively. Regarding improvement of motor function, 15 × 2.633 Gy appeared superior (p = 0.073). No significant difference was observed regarding ambulatory status (p = 0.822). The three-week regimen for MSCC has similar outcomes and reduces treatment time when compared to a four-week regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Incidence of brain metastases from genito-urinary cancers has increased over the last years due to improved imaging techniques and better survival outcomes for patients even at an advanced metastatic stage thanks to therapeutic advances. However, no clear consensus exists on their management, and every case ought to be discussed in a multidisciplinary panel. We perform a single-centre retrospective study to report on incidence, patient demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, and treatment modalities. We also manage to identify predictive factors of outcome. Background: Incidence of brain metastases is precisely unknown and there is no clear consensus on their management. We aimed to determine the incidence of brain metastases among patients with genito-urinary primaries, present patients' characteristics and identify prognostic factors. Method: We identified 51 patients treated in Geneva University Hospitals between January 1992 and December 2019. We retrospectively correlated their overall survival with 23 variables. We repeated a multivariate analysis with significant variables. Results: Overall incidence of Brain Metastases (BMs) among Genito-Urinary (GU) patients is estimated to be 1.76% (range per primary GU tumour type: 0.00–6.65%). BMs originate from germ cell tumours in two cases (3.92%), from urothelial cell carcinoma in 15 cases (29.41%), from prostate cancer in 13 cases (25.49%), and from renal cell carcinoma in 21 cases (41.18%); there are no BMs from penile cancer in our cohort. The median age at BM diagnosis is 67 years old (range: 25–92). Most patients (54%) have a stage IV disease at initial diagnosis and 11 patients (22%) have BM at initial diagnosis. Only six patients (12%) are asymptomatic at BM diagnosis. The median Overall Survival (OS) from BM diagnosis is 3 months (range: 0–127). Five patients (10%) are long survivors (OS > 24 months). OS is significantly influenced by patient performance status and administration of systemic treatment. In the absence of meningeal carcinomatosis, OS is influenced by systemic treatment and stereotactic radiosurgery. We also apply the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) score to our cohort and note significant differences between groups. Conclusion: Brain metastases from solid tumours is not a uniform disease, with a prognosis varying a lot among patients. The optimal management for patients with genito-urinary malignancies with brain metastases remain unclear and further research is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study assessed the prognostic impact of sarcopenic obesity (SO) in colorectal cancer patients. Among 211 sarcopenic patients, those with obesity (SO group) demonstrated significantly shorter cancer-related relapse-free survival (CRRFS) compared to their non-obese counterparts (non-SO group). While cancer-specific survival (CSS) was also poorer in the SO group, this difference did not reach statistical significance. Additionally, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Multivariate analysis identified sarcopenic obesity, elevated CEA levels, and unfavorable histological types as independent predictors of poor CRRFS. These findings underscore the importance of routine assessment of both sarcopenia and obesity in clinical practice. Moreover, they highlight the potential benefits of interventions aimed at increasing muscle mass and reducing visceral fat to enhance patient outcomes. Background: Sarcopenia, the age-related loss of muscle mass, is a negative prognostic factor in gastrointestinal cancer. Sarcopenia combined with visceral obesity (sarcopenic obesity) is associated with poor outcomes. We explored the influence of obesity and other factors on the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed with sarcopenia. Methods: We enrolled 211 patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed with preoperative sarcopenic obesity who underwent radical resection at Osaka University Hospital between January 2009 and January 2012. Muscle mass was assessed using the psoas muscle mass index. Obesity was evaluated by measuring the visceral fat area in the umbilical region. Patients were categorized into two groups: sarcopenia with obesity (SO) and sarcopenia without obesity (non-SO). Overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and cancer-related relapse-free survival (CRRFS) were compared between the two groups. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index, serum albumin, C-reactive protein, tumor markers, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), were also analyzed. Results: CRRFS was significantly shorter in the SO group than in the non-SO group (p = 0.028). PNI, mGPS, and GNRI were not identified as significant prognostic factors for CRRFS. Multivariate analysis highlighted sarcopenic obesity, elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and unfavorable histological types as significant predictors of poor CRRFS outcomes. Conclusions: Sarcopenic obesity is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with CRC. Thus, interventions aimed at increasing muscle mass and reducing visceral fat could potentially improve the prognosis of these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In a retrospective study of 86 patients, we identified independent predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after the resection of liver metastases of uveal melanoma using a multivariable Cox model. A disease-free interval of ≤24 months and a chromosome 8q surgain were associated with worse survival. With these two parameters, we built a novel clinico-genetic score that defined three risk groups with distinct prognoses. This novel score identified patients with a high risk of relapse after surgery. These patients may benefit from neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapy following complete surgical resection with the hope of improving survival outcomes. Surgical treatment of liver metastases of uveal melanoma (LMUM) could be proposed for selected patients. This retrospective study examined the prognostic significance of the genetic profiles of liver metastases after LMUM resection. A total of 86 patients treated with resection for LMUM, who underwent genetic analysis of liver metastasis, were included. A multivariable Cox model identified the independent predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The disease-free interval (DFI) and a chromosome 8q surgain (>3 copies) were independent predictors and categorized patients into three risk groups with distinct postoperative prognoses. For the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk scores of recurrence, the median RFS values were 15 months (95% CI: 10–22), 6 months (95% CI: 4–11), and 4 months (95% CI: 2–7), and the median OS values were 86 months (95% CI: 55-NR), 25 months (95% CI: 17–48), and 19 months (95% CI: 12–22), respectively. The predictive accuracy of this scoring system was demonstrated by a mean area under the curve (AUC(t)) of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65–0.90) for RFS and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.70–0.92) for OS. This novel score, based on a DFI of ≤24 months combined with a chromosome 8q surgain, identifies patients at a high risk of early recurrence and could help clinicians to propose perioperative treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy can be used for both staging and therapeutic purposes in ovarian, endometrial, gastric and bladder cancers. However, Para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality and with no evidence of benefits in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival. A systematic review of the literature was performed to look into the published randomized controlled studies (RCTs) that have reported the effectiveness of lymphadenectomy. The total number of patients was 4231. The studies reported that para-aortic lymphadenectomy did not improve overall survival and disease-free survival in advanced ovarian cancers, early endometrial cancers, advanced gastric, and bladder cancers. All of the studies had a low risk of bias. Conclusions: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not advised in advanced ovarian cancers, early endometrial cancers with low risks, advanced gastric cancers, and bladder cancers. Clinicians should inform patients regarding the benefits of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in terms of survival and the potential risks associated with it. Background: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy can be used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes as it aids in staging, provides prognostic data, and influences the patient's options for adjuvant therapy. However, there is still contention over its potential in treating cancer. A systematic review of the literature was performed to look into the published randomized controlled studies (RCTs) that have reported the effectiveness of lymphadenectomy. Methods: Five different electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Clinical trials.gov, ICTRP, and Embase, were used to conduct a comprehensive search. Original RCTs reporting on the impact of lymphadenectomy on the overall survival in various cancers were included. Information related to the study population, intervention, type of cancer, primary endpoints, and key findings of the study were extracted. Quality assessment of the selected studies was conducted using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool Rob 2 for randomized trials. Results: A total of 1693 citations, with 1511 from PubMed, 80 from the Cochrane Library, 67 from Embase, 18 from ICTRP, and 17 from Clinicaltrials.gov were retrieved. Preliminary screening was performed, and after applying selection criteria, nine articles were included in the final qualitative analysis. The total number of patients was 4231, and the sample size ranged from 70 to 1408. Among these nine studies, four studies were on genital cancers (two ovarian cancers, one endometrial cancer, and one cervical cancer); four on digestive cancers (advanced gastric cancers); and one on urinary cancer (advanced bladder cancer). These studies reported that para-aortic lymphadenectomy did not improve overall survival and disease-free survival in advanced ovarian cancers, early endometrial cancers, advanced gastric, and bladder cancers. All of the studies had a low risk of bias. Conclusions: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not advised in advanced ovarian cancers, early endometrial cancers with low risks, advanced gastric cancers, and bladder cancers. SNB could be an alternative to lymphadenectomy for ovarian cancer in the future. Clinicians should inform patients regarding the benefits of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in terms of survival and the potential risks associated with it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This research was conducted to evaluate the impact of ipilimumab treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma when monotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors has failed. In particular, the aim was to evaluate the efficacy of ipilimumab in this setting based on the presence or absence of BRAF or NRAS mutations. The present study could allow us to understand when salvage treatment with ipilimumab would have the best impact, although an analysis on a larger patient cohort would be necessary. Background: When monotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors in metastatic melanoma fails, there are currently no standard second-line choices. In case of the unavailability of clinical trials, ipilimumab represents a possible alternative treatment. Methods: We collected data of 44 patients who received ipilimumab after the failure of PD-1 inhibitors from July 2017 to May 2023 at our Institute. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and post-progression survival (PPS) based on BRAF or NRAS mutation status, sex, and the presence of brain metastases were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression was used to evaluate independence in multivariate analysis. The objective response rate (ORR) was estimated based on RECIST 1.1. Results: Among the 44 patients enrolled in this study, 28 BRAF-wildtype, 9 BRAF-mutated, and 7 NRAS-mutated patients were identified. OS analysis showed a significant difference between wildtype and BRAF- or NRAS-mutated patients: 23.2 months vs 5.3 and 4.59, respectively, p = 0.017. The presence of brain metastases and BRAF or NRAS mutation were independent factors for mortality in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In case of failure to enroll patients in innovative clinical trials, second-line ipilimumab still represents an effective therapy in patients with metastatic wildtype melanoma and in the absence of brain metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare condition, and the role of low HER2 expression (HER2 low) is not well understood. In this prospective study, 870 MBC patients treated between May 2009 and June 2023 were evaluated to investigate the prognostic significance of HER2 low status. After a median follow-up of 43 months, 659 patients were classified into three groups: 76% were HER2 low, 12.3% were HER2 zero, and 11.7% were HER2 positive. HER2 positivity was linked to younger age, higher tumor proliferation, and more aggressive cancer characteristics, but no differences were found between HER2 zero and HER2 low groups. Furthermore, HER2 low status did not influence disease-free or overall survival. However, HER2 low has a potential clinical impact on MBC as a treatment target. Background: Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease, and the potential influence of low expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2 low) remains unexplored. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated 870 patients treated for MBC between May 2009 and June 2023 to assess HER2 low status and its prognostic implications. Results: With a median follow-up of 43 months (range 1–175 months), 659 eligible patients were categorized into three groups based on HER2 status: 501 (76%) HER2 low, 81 (12.3%) HER2 zero, and 77 (11.7%) HER2 positive. HER2 positivity correlated with younger age, higher proliferation index, non-specific type histology, lymphovascular invasion (LVSI), and low differentiation grade. Notably, all these parameters were equally distributed between the HER2 zero and HER2 low groups. Additionally, HER2 positivity was significantly associated with increased occurrences of regional and distant lymph nodes and pulmonary metastases. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between HER2 zero and HER2 low. Disease-free and overall survival showed no significant disparities between the groups. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that HER2 low status is frequently detected in MBC. Despite this, HER2 low did not correlate with clinical and pathological parameters, nor did it impact patients' survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a promising treatment for brain metastases (BM) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), offering improved survival outcomes. Despite their potential, challenges remain due to the complex nature of BM and the need for combination therapies, including radiotherapy and anti-VEGF agents. This review discusses the current role of ICIs, the importance of optimizing treatment sequences, and the management of side effects. A personalized, multidisciplinary approach is essential for maximizing the benefits of ICIs in NSCLC patients with BM. Background: Brain metastases (BM) are a common, severe complication in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are difficult to treat due to their complex tumor biology and the intricate microenvironment of the brain. Objectives: This review examines the current role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating NSCLC with BM, focusing on the latest clinical trials, emerging strategies, current guidelines, and future directions. We highlight the efficacy of ICIs as monotherapy and in combination with other treatments such as radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, chemotherapy, and anti-VEGF agents. Results: While no single treatment sequence is universally accepted, combining ICIs with traditional therapies forms the core of the current treatment protocols. ICIs targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway have significantly advanced NSCLC treatment, demonstrated by improved overall and progression-free survival in various settings. However, optimizing these benefits requires careful consideration of potential side effects, including cognitive decline and radiation necrosis, and the impact of steroid use on ICI efficacy. Conclusion: The review underscores the necessity for a personalized, integrated multidisciplinary treatment approach. Future research should focus on refining combination therapies and understanding the optimal sequence and timing of treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: There is no literature that compares the clinical outcomes between intraperitoneal chemotherapy without bevacizumab and triweekly intravenous chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. The aim of this study was to elucidate whether, in the frontline treatment of advanced ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer, intraperitoneal cisplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy without bevacizumab will confer an improved survival benefit when compared with the combination of triweekly intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy and bevacizumab. We found that intraperitoneal chemotherapy without bevacizumab is associated with better survival when compared with intravenous chemotherapy with bevacizumab. Objectives: To compare the clinical outcomes of intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy plus bevacizumab versus intraperitoneal cisplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy without bevacizumab as the frontline treatment in women with advanced ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer. Methods: Between November 2012 and January 2024, medical records of all consecutive women with stage II~IV cancer treated with either frontline adjuvant intraperitoneal cisplatin/paclitaxel without bevacizumab (IP group), intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel without bevacizumab (IV group) or intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel with bevacizumab (IVB group) at a tertiary referral center were reviewed. Results: A total of 143 women (IP group, n = 57; IVB group, n = 23; IV group, n = 63) were reviewed. The IP group had greater progression-free survival compared to the IVB group (49.1 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 27.8 months to infinity, versus 11.9 months, 95% CI = 11.2 to 16.2 months; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.87, p = 0.017). Additionally, the IP group also had a higher overall survival compared to the IVB group (not reached, 95% CI = 55.6 months to infinity, versus 38.9 months, 95% CI = 21.9 months to infinity; adjusted HR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.79, p = 0.012). Conclusions: Intraperitoneal cisplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy without bevacizumab seems to offer a survival advantage when compared with intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel with bevacizumab in the frontline treatment of women with advanced ovarian cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard treatment for multiple myeloma (MM). This study examines gender-specific differences in response to treosulfan and melphalan (TreoMel) HDCT. Data from 112 MM patients treated at a single center were analyzed for outcomes such as response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities. Results revealed that females had significantly higher treosulfan exposure than males, as shown by peak levels and area under the curve (AUC). Notably, higher treosulfan exposure in females was associated with increased mortality, with those having an AUC > 900 mg*h/L showing shorter OS. However, treosulfan exposure did not affect PFS in females, and no significantly increased mortality risk was observed in males. These findings suggest that higher treosulfan doses increase toxicity in females without improving outcomes, supporting the need for further investigation into lower dosing for female MM patients. Introduction: The growing body of evidence around sexual and gender dimorphism in medicine, particularly in oncology, has highlighted differences in treatment response, outcomes, and side effects between males and females. Differences in drug metabolism, distribution, and elimination, influenced by factors like body composition and enzyme expression, contribute to these variations. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 112 multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated with first-line high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with treosulfan and melphalan (TreoMel) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) at a single academic center between January 2020 and August 2022. We assessed response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities in relation to gender and treosulfan exposure. Results: Our analysis revealed significant gender-specific differences in treosulfan exposure. Females had higher peak levels (343.8 vs. 309.0 mg/L, p = 0.0011) and area under the curve (AUC) (869.9 vs. 830.5 mg*h/L, p = 0.0427) compared to males. Higher treosulfan exposure was associated with increased mortality in females but not in males. Females with treosulfan AUC > 900 mg*h/L had significantly shorter overall survival, while PFS was unaffected by treosulfan exposure. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that female patients undergoing TreoMel HDCT have higher treosulfan exposure than males and that females with higher levels are at increased risk for toxicity and adverse outcomes. These data suggest that higher treosulfan doses do not confer a benefit in terms of better outcomes for females. Therefore, exploring lower treosulfan doses for female MM patients undergoing TreoMel HDCT may be warranted to mitigate toxicity and improve outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The study evaluated the long-term outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with S-1 after limited surgery for T1 or T2 lower rectal cancer. The 3-year and 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 90.17% and 85.87%, respectively, showing favorable outcomes for T1 cancer patients, with effective anal function preservation. However, further treatment is needed to improve outcomes for T2 cancer patients. Background: The short-term outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with S-1 (a combination of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil) following limited surgery for patients with T1 or T2 lower rectal cancer have shown encouraging results. Objectives: This study was designed to delve deeper into the long-term outcomes of CRT with S-1 after limited surgery, with the goal of evaluating both the long-term efficacy and potential risks associated with this treatment approach in patients diagnosed with T1 or T2 lower rectal cancer. Methods: This was conducted as a multicenter, single-arm, prospective phase II trial. The patient population consisted of individuals clinically diagnosed with either T1 or T2 lower rectal or anal canal cancer, with a maximum tumor diameter of 30 mm and classified as N0 or M0. Patients underwent local excision or endoscopic resection. After surgery, CRT with S-1 was administered to patients meeting several criteria, including the confirmation of well-differentiated or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, negative surgical margins, submucosal invasion depth of ≥1000 µm, and high tumor-budding grade (2/3). The primary endpoint of this study was relapse-free survival, while secondary endpoints included local recurrence-free survival, overall survival, anal sphincter preservation rate, and safety. Results: A total of 52 patients were included, with pathological diagnoses revealing T1 in 36 patients and T2 in 16 patients. The 3-year and 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 90.17% and 85.87%, respectively. The 3-year and 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 90.17% and 88.07%, respectively, while the 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 94.03% and 91.94%, respectively. Conclusions: CRT with S-1 after limited surgery for T1 lower rectal cancer demonstrated favorable outcomes in terms of recurrence, survival, and local control rates while effectively maintaining anal function in patients. However, further treatment approaches may be necessary to improve outcomes for patients diagnosed with stage T2 lower rectal cancer [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Since no randomized clinical trial has compared surgery to chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) in FIGO stage IB3 cervical cancer patients, the optimal management remains controversial. In our study, nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (nsLRH) proved to be safe and effective. The encouraging results on toxicity and survival, when compared to CTRT, warrant further investigation and reinforce the idea that surgery is a valid option for these patients. (1) Background: In 2018 FIGO reclassified tumors confined to the cervix larger than 4 cm as stage IB3. Although concurrent CTRT has been the standard of care and surgery the alternative, optimal management remains controversial due to the lack of direct comparison between surgery and CTRT. (2) Methods: This prospective observational study investigated the efficacy, safety and oncologic outcomes of nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (nsLRH) for FIGO stage IB3 cervical cancer patients (IB3). From 2009 to 2023, IB3 patients underwent laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomies with frozen section analysis, followed by a nsLRH if the lymph nodes were tumor-free. No uterine manipulator was used and the vaginal cuff was sealed before retrieving the specimen. Intermediate-risk patients were under close observation without adjuvant therapy. Outcomes were monitored until 2023. (3) Results: During the study period, 74 IB3 patients were treated. Sixty-eight (91.9%) underwent a nsLRH. A complete resection with negative margins was achieved in all cases. At a median of 68 months of follow-up, the disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 89.7% and the overall survival (OS) rate was 93.1%. The overall complication rate was 23.5% and there were no grade 4–5 complications. (4) Conclusions: In patients with IB3 cervical cancer, a nsLRH is safe and effective. While awaiting the results from ongoing randomized trials, these findings support nsLRH as a viable treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Routine measurement of basal calcitonin (bCt) levels is used in the preoperative workup of thyroid nodules ("Ct screening") and has been documented to facilitate the early diagnosis and treatment of patients with medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Although clear cut-offs have been proposed, the relevance for predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) and long-term outcomes (LOs) has so far not been tested on a large cohort of patients. In this study, 306 patients with MTC were grouped into three oncologic risk groups by clearly defined gender- and assay-specific bCt cutoffs. The rate of central LNM was 2.6% in risk Group 1 (minimal oncologic risk; recently published MTC incidence: females: 17.1%; males: 37.5%) and 6.0% in Group 2 (low oncologic risk: recently published MTC incidence 100%). Lateral LNM and distant metastasis (DMet) were not found. The overall cure rate for both groups was 95.7% and 20-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 100%. In risk Group 3 (high oncologic risk) LNMs were found in 51.0% (thereof 88.9% also in the lateral neck compartment) and DMet in 13.5%. The cure rate dropped to 58.3% and DSS to 85.3%. Within a Ct screening program, grouping patients upon pretherapeutic bCt provides a simple risk classification system for indicating surgery and its extent, predicting LNM, and estimating LOs. Background: The clinical relevance of clearly defined pretherapeutic basal calcitonin (bCt) cut-offs for predicting lymph node metastases (LNMs) and long-term outcomes (LOs) has so far not been tested in a large cohort of patients with medullary thyroid cancer included in a Ct screening program during the initial diagnostic workup of thyroid nodules. Material and Methods: Female (f) patients with a bCt level of ≤23 pg/mL and male (m) patients with a level of ≤43 pg/mL were assigned to Group 1 (minimal oncologic risk), patients with a bCt between 24 and 84 pg/mL (f) and 44–99 pg/mL (m) to Group 2 (low oncologic risk), and those with a bCt of ≥85 pg/mL (f) and ≥100 pg/mL (m) to Group 3 (high oncologic risk). All patients underwent surgery applying a uniform surgical protocol. The median follow-up was 100 months. Results: The study included 306 patients. In 3/115 (2.6%) patients in Group 1 and in 3/50 (6.0%) in Group 2, LNM in the central but not lateral neck and no distant metastases (DMet) were documented. In both groups, the biochemical long-term cure rate was 95.7% and the disease-specific-survival (DSS) rate was 100% at 10, 15 and 20 years. Lateral LNM and DMet were diagnosed only in Group 3. The bCt levels of N0 and N1 patients showed broadly overlapping ranges, thus impeding the differentiation between those patients through bCt. Both the cure rate and DSS were significantly worse in Group 3. The overall biochemical long-term cure rate was 78.2%. Conclusions: Within a Ct screening program, grouping patients upon pretherapeutic bCt provides a simple risk classification system for indicating surgery, predicting LN involvement, and LOs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment technique that delivers higher doses of conformal radiation precisely to specific targets. SBRT is utilized for the treatment of the more common cancers such as lung, liver and prostate malignancies, both in the early stage and the oligometastatic setting. The aim of this review is to highlight the current role of SBRT for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), a disease which was previously thought to be radioresistant, particularly to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. There is now an increasing body of literature encompassing published phase II trials, reviews and meta-analyses demonstrating the effectiveness of SBRT in both early-stage RCC (as an alternative to patients who are not surgical candidates) and within the context of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for patients with oligometastatic and oligoprogressive RCC. Ongoing randomized trials are also exploring the role of SBRT as a cytoreductive treatment in metastatic RCC. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been increasing in incidence by around 1.5% per year for several years. However, the mortality rate has been decreasing by 1.6% per year, and this can be attributed to stage migration and improvements in treatment. One treatment modality that has emerged in recent years is stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), which is an advanced radiotherapy technique that allows the delivery of high-dose radiation to the tumor while minimizing doses to the organs at risk. SBRT has developed a role in the treatment of early-stage, oligometastatic and oligoprogressive RCC. In localized disease, phase II trials and meta-analyses have shown that SBRT provides a very high probability of long-term local control with a low risk of severe late toxicity. In oligometastatic (OMD) RCC, the same level of evidence has similarly shown good local control and minimal toxicity. SBRT could also delay the necessity to start or switch systemic treatments. Medical societies have started to incorporate SBRT in their guidelines in the treatment of localized disease and OMD. A possible future role of SBRT involves cytoreduction. It is theorized that SBRT can lower tumor burden and enhance immune-related response, but it cannot be recommended until the results of the phase II trials are published. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study examined the outcomes of lung metastasectomy in urothelial carcinoma patients using data from a Japanese multi-institutional database. The study included 100 patients who underwent the procedure between 1985 and 2021. Results showed 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates of 59% and 46%, respectively. Larger tumor diameter and presence of distant metastases at primary cancer treatment were identified as significant adverse prognostic factors. The authors claim that this is the largest published case series on this topic, providing benchmark data for assessing long-term outcomes. Background/objectives: The efficacy of lung metastasectomy in patients with urothelial carcinoma remains inconclusive, as there is only limited evidence from small studies. In this study, we aimed to assess the prognostic outcomes of excising pulmonary metastases from urothelial carcinoma. Methods: In this study, we utilized data from the Metastatic Lung Tumor Study Group of Japan database, a multi-institutional prospective database of pulmonary metastasectomies. We examined the data of patients who had undergone pulmonary metastasectomy for urothelial carcinoma between 1985 and 2021. Exclusion criteria included insufficient clinical information and follow-up of <3 months. Results: The study cohort comprised 100 patients (63 bladder cancer, 37 renal pelvic and ureteral cancer), with a median follow-up of 34 months. There were 70 male and 30 female patients of average age 66.5 ± 10.4 years at lung metastasectomy. The median interval from treatment of the primary lesion to metastasectomy was 19 months and the maximum tumor diameter was 21 ± 15 mm. Three- and five-year overall survival rates were 69% and 59%, respectively. Three- and five-year disease-free survival rates were 56% and 46%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified larger tumor diameter (hazard ratio: 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.21–2.17) and distant metastases at the time of treatment of the primary cancer (hazard ratio: 4.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.54–11.6) as significant adverse prognostic factors for overall survival. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest published case series of pulmonary resection for metastatic urothelial carcinoma, providing benchmark data for the assessment of long-term outcomes of this rare entity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This retrospective study explored the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients from Appalachian Kentucky with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent uterine cervix cancer, focusing on outcomes with various lines of chemotherapy. This study analyzed data from 127 patients treated between 2002 and 2023, examining first-, second-, and third-line treatments. After the first-line chemotherapy, the median PFS was 5.5 months. For the second- and third-line treatments, the median PFS was 5.3 and 3.0 months, respectively. Patients receiving cisplatin-containing regimens had a slightly better first-line PFS of 6.5 months. This study suggests that a five-month PFS may serve as a benchmark for future trials evaluating the efficacy of radiopharmaceuticals in this patient population. This study emphasizes the need for new treatment options, as survival outcomes tend to decrease with subsequent lines of therapy. Background: Prior preclinical studies showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile associated with radiopharmaceuticals for patients with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent uterine cervix cancers. Whether the addition of a radiopharmaceutical to chemotherapy would significantly increase progression-free survival in such patients is untested. Our retrospective study sought to associate the line of treatment and progression-free survival as benchmarks for next-generation radiopharmaceutical development. Methods: We grouped metastatic, persistent, or recurrent uterine cervix cancer patients not amenable to curable surgery or radiotherapy between 2002 and 2023 by the line of doublet, triplet, and quadruplet chemotherapy or another intervention. After the first-line treatment, patients were monitored for radiographic progression every three months for up to three years. The primary endpoints were the first and any second or third progression-free survival intervals. Results: A total of 127 patients contributed demographic, tumor, line of treatment, and outcome data with a median follow-up of 18 months (25–75% interquartile range: 9 to 37 months). After the first-line treatment, 113 patients had local or distant progression or died from any cause, most often death from the disease (67%). Median progression-free survivals were 5.5 months (95% confidence interval: 4.8–6.0 months), 5.3 months (95% confidence interval: 4.5–6.3 months), and 3.0 months (95% confidence interval: 2.1–3.7 months) for the first-, second-, and third-line treatments, respectively. For a first-line cisplatin-containing regimen, the median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval: 5.5–7.7 months). Conclusions: This study highlights the limited efficacy of current treatments for metastatic, persistent, or recurrent uterine cancer patients. A five-month progression-free survival might serve as a benchmark for the development of novel therapies in clinical efficacy trials, such as radiopharmaceuticals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: We examined the association of the entire submission of the tumor (ESOT) and the entire submission of the pancreas (ESOP) with clinicopathologic features and survival in 627 pancreatic cancer patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We demonstrated that both ESOT and ESOP were associated with lower ypT, less frequent perineural invasion, and better tumor response. Both ESOT and ESOP were associated with less frequent recurrence/metastasis, better disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in the overall study population. ESOP was associated with better DFS and OS in patients with ypT0/ypT1 or ypN0 tumors and better OS in patients with complete or near-complete response. ESOT was associated with better OS in patients with ypT0/ypT1 or ypN0 tumors. Both ESOT and ESOP were independent prognostic factors for OS in multivariate survival analyses. Therefore, ESOP and ESOT are associated with the prognosis of PDAC patients with complete or near-complete response and a ypT0/ypT1 tumor after NAT. Adequate sampling is essential to an accurate pathologic evaluation of pancreatectomy specimens resected for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). However, limited data are available for the association between the sampling and survival in these patients. We examined the association of the entire submission of the tumor (ESOT) and the entire submission of the pancreas (ESOP) with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as their correlations with clinicopathologic features, for 627 patients with PDAC who received NAT and pancreaticoduodenectomy. We demonstrated that both ESOT and ESOP were associated with lower ypT, less frequent perineural invasion, and better tumor response (p < 0.05). ESOP was also associated with a smaller tumor size (p < 0.001), more lymph nodes (p < 0.001), a lower ypN stage (p < 0.001), better differentiation (p = 0.02), and less frequent lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.009). However, since ESOP and ESOT were primarily conducted for cases with no grossly identifiable tumor or minimal residual carcinoma in initial sections, potential bias cannot be excluded. Both ESOT and ESOP were associated with less frequent recurrence/metastasis and better DFS and OS (p < 0.05) in the overall study population. ESOP was associated with better DFS and better OS in patients with ypT0/ypT1 or ypN0 tumors and better OS in patients with complete or near-complete response (p < 0.05). ESOT was associated with better OS in patients with ypT0/ypT1 or ypN0 tumors (p < 0.05). Both ESOT and ESOP were independent prognostic factors for OS according to multivariate survival analyses. Therefore, accurate pathologic evaluation using ESOP and ESOT is associated with the prognosis in PDAC patients with complete or near-complete pathologic response and ypT0/ypT1 tumor after NAT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a blood cancer which classically has a prolonged course of remissions and relapses. Several new highly efficacious medications have been developed for MM in recent years, including some that utilize the body's own immune cells to control the cancer. Alongside the development of these new medications has been the evolution of tests to track small amounts of (measurable) residual disease (MRD). Several MRD tests can now find and track as little as 1 residual cancer cell in 1 million in certain cases. Having no detectable MRD has been independently associated with improved cancer control and longer survival—here, we review how these tests might be used as a companion to new immune therapies for MM. Several novel T-cell-based therapies have recently become available for multiple myeloma (MM). These T-cell redirecting therapies (TRTs) include chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) and bispecific antibodies (BiAbs). In both clinical trial and real-world data, these therapies have demonstrated high rates of deep clinical response, and some are now approved for second-line treatment for relapsed MM. The deep and sustained clinical responses these therapies are capable of inducing will require sophisticated response monitoring to provide meaningful information for patient care. Obtaining measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity has been validated as an independent positive prognostic marker for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in both newly diagnosed and relapsed refractory patients with multiple myeloma. Assessment for MRD negativity was performed in all of the trials for FDA-approved TRT. Here, we summarize pertinent data for MRD assessment following TRT in MM and provide a rationale and structured framework for conducting MRD testing post TRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This research aims to identify new protein markers that can help predict the risk of disease progression in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) at the time of diagnosis. By analyzing a large number of proteins in FL samples, the study found significant differences in protein composition among patients, which may help distinguish those at higher risk of disease progression. These findings could improve our understanding of FL biology and lead to the discovery of new biomarkers or treatment targets, potentially allowing for more personalized and effective treatment strategies for FL patients, improving their outcomes. Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is characterized by an indolent nature and generally favorable prognosis, yet poses a particular clinical challenge, since disease progression is observed in a notable subset of patients. Currently, it is not possible to anticipate which patients will be at risk of progression, highlighting the need for reliable predictive biomarkers that can be detected early in the disease. Methods: We applied tandem-mass-tag labelled nano-liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (nLC-MS/MS) on 48 diagnostic formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from patients with advanced-stage FL. Of these, 17 experienced subsequent progression (subsequently-progressing, sp-FL) while 31 did not (non-progressing, np-FL). Results: We identified 99 proteins that were significantly differentially expressed between sp-FL samples and np-FL samples (p < 0.05; log2-fold changes between 0.2 and −1.3). Based on this subset of proteins, we classified patients into high-risk and low-risk subgroups using unsupervised machine learning techniques. Pathway analyses of the identified proteins revealed aberrancies within the immune system and cellular energy metabolism. In addition, two proteins were selected for immunohistochemical evaluation, namely stimulator of interferon genes 1 (STING1) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2). Notably, IDH2 retained significantly lower expression levels in sp-FL samples compared with np-FL samples (p = 0.034). Low IDH2 expression correlated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS, p = 0.020). Conclusions: This study provides evidence for some of the biological mechanisms likely to be involved in FL progression and, importantly, identifies potential predictive biomarkers for improvement of risk stratification up-front at time of FL diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer are often managed by various treatment approaches including surgery, chemotherapy/immunotherapy, and radiation therapy. While patients with a good performance status and a limited burden of disease are often candidates for surgical resection, the selection of the optimal adjuvant treatment paradigm, in light of the development of novel treatments for tumors with actionable mutations, remains a challenge. In this study, we sought to examine the benefit of radiation therapy, systemic therapy, or a combination of treatments following surgery with respect to in-brain progression-free survival and overall survival. Our data demonstrate that a combination of radiation therapy and systemic therapy has a benefit in improving progression-free survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have developed brain metastases. Background/Objectives: Brain metastases (BrMs) are a common complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), present in up to 50% of patients. While the treatment of BrMs requires a multidisciplinary approach with surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and systemic therapy, the advances in molecular sequencing have improved outcomes in patients with targetable mutations. With a push towards the molecular characterization of cancers, we evaluated the outcomes by treatment modality at our institution with respect to prioritizing RT and targeted therapies. Methods: We identified the patients with NSCLC BrMs treated with surgical resection. The primary endpoints were in-brain freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint included index lesion recurrence. The tumor molecular profiles were reviewed. The outcomes were evaluated by treatment modality: surgery followed by adjuvant RT and/or adjuvant systemic therapy. Results: In total, 155/272 (57%) patients who received adjuvant therapy with adequate follow-up were included in this analysis. The patients treated with combination therapy vs. monotherapy had a median FFP time of 10.72 months vs. 5.38 months, respectively (p = 0.072). The patients of Hispanic/Latino vs. non-Hispanic/Latino descent had a statistically significant worse OS of 12.75 months vs. 53.15 months, respectively (p = 0.015). The patients who received multimodality therapy had a trend towards a reduction in index lesion recurrences (χ2 test, p = 0.063) with a statistically significant improvement in the patients receiving immunotherapy (χ2 test, p = 0.0018). Conclusions: We found that systemic therapy combined with RT may have an increasing role in delaying the time to progression; however, there was no statistically significant relationship between OS and treatment modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Primary myelofibrosis and secondary myelofibrosis after polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia are sub-entities of myeloproliferative neoplasms with poor prognosis for long-term survival. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation remains the only potentially curative therapy, but the risk of serious side effects and possible treatment-related mortality must be considered. In recent years, efforts have been made to optimize conditioning therapy, donor selection, and supportive therapy in order to improve the outcomes of stem-cell transplantation. We report on 36 patients with myelofibrosis who underwent stem-cell transplantation in our center. We compared the outcomes in earlier and more recent years and evaluated the influence of certain transplant- and patient-specific variables. Pretreatment with a JAK inhibitor, intensified conditioning, and the preferential use of haploidentical instead of mismatched unrelated donors for patients lacking an HLA-identical donor are most likely responsible for the improved outcome after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis in recent years. (1) Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only treatment with the potential for cure in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). However, the risk of graft rejection, which is particularly high in MF, and the risk of significant non-relapse mortality must be considered. (2) Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, we compared allo-HSCT outcomes in 36 adult patients with MF transplanted at two-time intervals (2001–2015 versus 2016–2021). (3) Results: The estimated median overall survival was 48.9 months (95%CI 0.00–98.2) in the cohort transplanted before 2016 and not reached in the more recent years (p = 0.04) due to markedly lower non-relapse mortality (p = 0.02). The 3-year relapse incidence was low in both cohorts (11.1% and 12.5%, p > 0.99). When comparing only subgroups within the more recent cohort based on the presence or absence of total body irradiation (TBI) or the use of sequential regimens, OS and PFS were comparable. (4) Conclusion: Pretreatment with ruxolitinib, intensified conditioning, and the preferential use of haploidentical related instead of mismatched unrelated donors for patients lacking an HLA-identical donor are most likely responsible for the improved outcome after allo-HCT in MF in recent years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]