Search

Simple Summary: The role of the GPER in cancer is controversial due to its dual anti and protumor effects. Elevated GPER expression in cervical cancer has been associated with improved survival outcomes. In cervical cancer cell lines, the selective GPER agonist G-1 induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, although the precise molecular mechanisms behind these effects are not fully understood. This study explores the impact of GPER activation by G-1 on the transcriptome, cell migration, and invasion in SiHa cells, as well as in non-tumorigenic keratinocytes transduced with HPV16 E6 or E7 oncogenes. G-1 has been shown to exert antitumor effects by activating apoptotic pathways and modulating migration and invasion processes. The findings support the GPER as a promising prognostic marker and suggest that G-1 could be a valuable therapeutic tool for treating cervical cancer. Background/Objectives: Estrogens and HPV are necessary for cervical cancer (CC) development. The levels of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) increase as CC progresses, and HPV oncoproteins promote GPER expression. The role of this receptor is controversial due to its anti- and pro-tumor effects. This study aimed to determine the effect of GPER activation, using its agonist G-1, on the transcriptome, cell migration, and invasion in SiHa cells and non-tumorigenic keratinocytes transduced with the HPV16 E6 or E7 oncogenes. Methods: Transcriptome analysis was performed to identify G-1-enriched pathways in SiHa cells. We evaluated cell migration, invasion, and the expression of associated proteins in SiHa, HaCaT-16E6, and HaCaT-16E7 cells using various assays. Results: Transcriptome analysis revealed pathways associated with proliferation/apoptosis (TNF-α signaling, UV radiation response, mitotic spindle formation, G2/M cell cycle, UPR, and IL-6/JAK/STAT), cellular metabolism (oxidative phosphorylation), and cell migration (angiogenesis, EMT, and TGF-α signaling) in SiHa cells. Key differentially expressed genes included PTGS2 (pro/antitumor), FOSL1, TNFRSF9, IL1B, DIO2, and PHLDA1 (antitumor), along with under-expressed genes with pro-tumor effects that may inhibit proliferation. Additionally, DKK1 overexpression suggested inhibition of cell migration. G-1 increased vimentin expression in SiHa cells and reduced it in HaCaT-16E6 and HaCaT-16E7 cells. However, G-1 did not affect α-SMA expression or cell migration in any of the cell lines but increased invasion in HaCaT-16E7 cells. Conclusions: GPER is a promising prognostic marker due to its ability to activate apoptosis and inhibit proliferation without promoting migration/invasion in CC cells. G-1 could potentially be a tool in the treatment of this neoplasia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]