Search

Conventionally, if an exercise electrocardiogram does not show evidence of ischemia, the patient must have achieved at least 85% of the predicted maximum heart rate for that test to be considered negative. However, no documentation of the validity of this practice exists. Thus, we evaluated the exercise electrocardiograms of 164 patients who had also undergone coronary angiography within 6 months of the exercise test. The predictive value of a negative exercise electrocardiogram was determined for each percentage point between 50 and 90% of the age-predicted maximum heart rate achieved or exceeded. The predictive value was found to increase modestly between 65 and 80% of the predicted maximum heart rate with no major changes above or below this range. Thus, it appears reasonable (in the setting of a hospital-based exercise laboratory) to either consider a negative exercise electrocardiogram as a valid finding if at least 80% of the predicted maximum heart rate is achieved, or preferably to simply report the negative finding with the percent maximum heart rate attained and the proviso that the predictive value of the test is progressively improved as higher heart rates are attained.

The comparative timing of hemodynamic alterations by sublingual nitroglycerin administered by spray vs. tablet has not been studied. Similarly, the directly measured comparative effects on left ventricular pressures have not been reported. To investigate these issues, we analyzed 49 patients undergoing elective diagnostic cardiac catheterization who were randomized to receive 0.4 mg sublingual nitroglycerin by either spray or tablet. Before administration of contrast medium, control determinations of left ventricular end-diastolic and systolic pressures and heart rate were done. These parameters were then evaluated at half-minute intervals for 5 min. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was reduced similarly in both groups, with the reduction achieving significance at 1.5 min in the spray and 2.0 min in the tablet group. Lowering of the left ventricular systolic pressure was also similar in the two groups, reaching significance at 2.5 min with spray and 2.0 min with tablet. Heart rate increased significantly by 2.0 min in the tablet group but did not change in the spray group. These findings were not altered by the level of resting left ventricular end-diastolic pressure or use of chronic nitrates. Thus, we found nitroglycerin to be similarly effective in timing and extent of response whether administered by spray or tablet, though the difference in heart rate responses remains unexplained.