Search

Fluid overload has been associated with morbidity and mortality in various clinical scenarios including heart failure and critical illness. It exerts pathologic sequelae in almost all the organ systems. Proper management of patients with fluid overload requires knowledge of the underlying pathophysiology, objective evaluation of volume status, selection of appropriate therapeutic options, and maintenance and modulation of tissue perfusion. There are several methods to appraise volume status but none without limitations. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic utility, prognostic significance, and shortcomings of various bedside tools in the detection of fluid overload and evaluation of hemodynamic status. These include clinical examination, biomarkers, blood volume assessment, bioimpedance analysis, point-of-care ultrasound, and remote pulmonary pressure monitoring. In our opinion, clinicians must adopt a multiparametric approach offsetting the limitations of individual methods to formulate a management plan tailored to patients’ needs.

Objective assessment of fluid status is of utmost significance in the management of patients with complex disorders involving hemodynamics and multi-organ crosstalk such as cardiorenal or hepatorenal syndrome. The role of volume expansion using intravenous albumin in the setting of hepatorenal syndrome has been an everlasting debate among clinicians. With the accumulating evidence on the deleterious consequences of iatrogenic fluid overload, empiric albumin administration in these patients has been the focus of much attention, and the findings of recent studies suggest a higher incidence of pulmonary complications with albumin. Poor sensitivity of conventional physical examination has led to an interest in the utility of novel noninvasive bedside tools such as point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) to evaluate hemodynamics more precisely. Once confined to specialties such as obstetrics and emergency medicine, the scope of diagnostic POCUS is rapidly expanding in other fields including internal medicine and nephrology. Herein, we offer our perspective on the emerging role of POCUS for objective evaluation of patients with suspected hepatorenal physiology based on our experience. We propose that future clinical trials consider incorporating this strategy and explore the impact of POCUS-guided therapy on the outcomes.

Background: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has emerged as a mechanistically relevant therapeutic option for patients with heart failure (HF), volume overload, and varying degrees of renal dysfunction (i.e., chronic cardiorenal syndrome). Congestion has been identified as a potent ominous prognostic factor in this patient population, outperforming a number of established risk factors. As such, excess fluid removal is recognized as a relevant therapeutic target in this setting. Methods: Accumulating evidence points to the importance of sodium removal as part of any decongestive strategy because extraction of sodium-free water has little or no impact on the outcomes of these patients. Hence, optimization of sodium removal by PD should be the primary focus in the setting of HF and cardiorenal syndrome, especially if PD is started when the patient still has adequate residual renal function for clearance of waste products. Results: Herein, we provide an overview of approaches that can tailor PD treatment to the patients’ characteristics and clinical needs (e.g., choice of PD modality) to fully exploit its decongestive properties. Other methods that could prove helpful in the future will also be briefly discussed. Conclusion: While these strategies could help with efficient sodium extraction and volume optimization, future studies are needed to evaluate their impact on the outcomes of this specific patient population.