Search

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of external carotid artery (ECA) stenting in patients with ipsilateral internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion., Background: In patients with ICA occlusion, severe ipsilateral ECA stenosis may exacerbate pre-existing cerebral ischemia and cognitive impairment. It remains unclear whether ECA stenting to normalize ECA collaterals to the cerebralis alleviates cerebral ischemia and improves cognitive function., Methods: From January 2008 to June 2019, we retrospectively collected clinical data of 36 consecutive patients with ipsilateral ICA occlusion who had undergone ECA stenting (mean age, 66.7 ± 8.3 years; males, n = 26 [72.2%]). Neurocognitive test results, including Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) tests, symptom assessment, and adverse events were recorded., Results: ECA stenting was successful in all 36 patients. Intra-operatively, six (16.7%) patients experienced hemodynamic depression during balloon dilation and recovered completely within 2 days. Within a 12-month follow-up period, two patients experienced a transient ischemic attack, one patient had a contralateral minor stroke, and 33 patients remained asymptomatic. No other adverse events occurred in the peri-operative or follow-up periods. Compared with baseline, significant MMSE (25.3 ± 1.3 vs. 23.6 ± 1.7; p < .05) and MOCA (24.1 ± 1.3 vs. 22.8 ± 1.7; p < .05) test score improvements were observed 3 months post-operatively and were maintained throughout follow-up., Conclusions: ECA stenting may improve cerebral ischemia and cognitive function in patients with severe ECA stenosis and ipsilateral ICA occlusion; however, further research is required to support our findings., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the safety, blood pressure changes, and biochemical responses of superselective adrenal artery embolization (SAAE) in hypertensive patients with idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA)., Background: SAAE is a minimally invasive procedure that has been used to successfully treat aldosterone-producing adenoma. However, its effect for patients with IHA is unevaluated., Methods: A total of 41 hypertensive patients who were diagnosed with IHA and underwent SAAE at the Fuwai Hospital between December 2010 and June 2016 were prospectively enrolled. The blood pressure, antihypertensive medications, plasma aldosterone and potassium levels, and adverse events were assessed. The primary endpoint was the change in home blood pressure at 12 months, compared with baseline., Results: SAAE was technically successful in 39 patients. Postoperatively, home and 24-hr mean blood pressures were reduced by 14/9 and 10/7 mmHg at 1 month, respectively, and by 13/7 and 11/7 mmHg at 12 months, respectively. The number of antihypertensive agents used reduced by 1.0 and 1.1 at 1 month and 12 months, respectively (all p < .001). Compared with baseline (524.0 pmol/L), the standing plasma aldosterone reduced to 293.4 pmol/L at 12 months (p < .001). Serum potassium increased from 3.0 to 4.1 mmol/L while the rate of potassium supplement and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use reduced from 87.1 and 89.7%, respectively, to 28.2 and 17.9%, respectively, at 12 months (all p < .001). There were no serious complications in the perioperative and 12-month follow-up periods., Conclusions: SAAE was effective and feasible for IHA treatment, without serious complications, therefore, maybe a potential treatment., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficiency of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with selective stenting treating Chinese patients with renal artery stenosis (RAS) due to fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD)., Background: Endovascular data of patients with RAS caused by FMD are scarce in China., Methods: Clinical data of 105 hypertensive patients with RAS caused by FMD underwent endovascular therapy at a single-site between June 2001 and October 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Baseline blood pressure, use of antihypertensive medications, renal function, and adverse events at a 1-year follow-up were evaluated., Results: The patients were aged between 10 and 64 years (mean age 26.7 ± 8.2 years) and 52 (49.5%) were female. In total, 105 patients undergoing endovascular therapy involving 124 RASs. Thirty (24.2%), sixty-four (51.6%), and thirty (24.2%) RASs were multifocal, unifocal, and tubular types, respectively. Ninety-four (89.5%) and eleven (10.5%) patients underwent PTA alone and PTA plus stenting, respectively. The technical success rate for endovascular therapy was 95.2% (100/105) without severe complications. During 1-year follow-up (n = 100), the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased from 157.6 ± 17.5 and 102.3 ± 14.2 to 129.6 ± 12.3 and 81.3 ± 11.1 mmHg, respectively, and the number of antihypertensive medications reduced from 2.2 ± 1.2 to 0.8 ± 1.0 (all p < .001). The cure rate and improved rate of blood pressure was 49.0 and 40.0%, respectively. The serum creatinine levels remained stable. The primary and secondary restenosis rate was 13.4 and 5.8%, respectively., Conclusion: Endovascular therapy for treating RAS caused by FMD was technically safe and effective for reducing blood pressure in Chinese patients., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of stenting on blood pressure in hypertensive patients with symptomatic proximal subclavian or vertebral artery stenosis., Background: Whether posterior circulation revascularization could reduce blood pressure in hypertensive patients with posterior circulation hypoperfusion has not been investigated in humans., Methods: A total of 48 patients with essential hypertension (33 males; mean age 63.0 ± 8.7 years) with symptomatic proximal subclavian or vertebral artery stenosis who underwent stenting successfully at the Fuwai Hospital were prospectively enrolled between January 2014 and December 2015. All 48 patients were followed up at 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure. Blood pressure, use of antihypertensive agents, and complications were investigated., Results: Baseline values included office blood pressure of 132/77 ± 10/8 mmHg, mean 24-hr blood pressure of 127/75 ± 12/9 mmHg, and mean antihypertensive agents used of 1.6 ± 0.8. Stenosis of the subclavian and vertebral arteries decreased from 88.9 ± 9.5% and 85.8 ± 7.4% to 5.5 ± 3.5% and 4.6 ± 3.7%, respectively, immediately after the procedure. Reductions in office blood pressure were - 7/-3 (SD 3/2), -9/-4 (5/3), and - 10/-5 (7/5) mmHg at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. While 24-hr blood pressures after the procedure reduced by -5/-3 mmHg at 6 months, the total number of antihypertensive agents used at the aforementioned time points was unchanged., Conclusion: This first prospective cohort study in humans showed that posterior circulation stenting is apparently effective in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive patients with symptomatic proximal subclavian or vertebral artery stenosis., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of simultaneous endovascular therapy for supra-arch multivessel stenosis., Background: Limited data are currently available on simultaneous intervention for supra-arch multivessel stenosis because of concerns regarding the high incidence of procedure-related complications., Methods: From January 2005 to December 2012, the clinical data of 256 consecutive inpatients who underwent simultaneous intervention for supra-arch multivessel stenosis were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end point was a composite of any type of stroke or neurological death within 30 days., Results: In total, 535 supra-arch vessels underwent endovascular therapy. In total, 234, 21, and 1 patient underwent simultaneous intervention of 2, 3, and 4 supra-arch vessels, respectively. The lesions involved only the anterior circulation in 40.2% (103/256), only the posterior circulation in 10.5% (27/256), and the combined circulations in 49.2% (126/256) patients. The overall procedural success rate was 99.6% (533/535). The incidence of the primary end point was 3.5%. According to the lesion location, the incidence of the primary end point was 3.9% (4/103), 0% (0/27), and 4.0% (5/126) in the patients who underwent endovascular treatment for the anterior circulation alone, posterior circulation alone, and combined circulations, respectively. According to the number of supra-arch lesions, the incidence of the primary end point was 3.4% (8/234), 4.8% (1/21), and 0% (0/1) in the patients who underwent simultaneous intervention of 2, 3, and 4 vessels, respectively., Conclusions: The study showed that simultaneous intervention for supra-arch multivessel stenosis was safe and technically feasible., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: To evaluate immediate and long-term clinical outcomes of stenting for middle aortic syndrome (MAS) caused by Takayasu arteritis (TA)., Background: Studies of endovascular stenting for the treatment of MAS caused by TA are scare., Methods: Data from 48 consecutive TA patients (mean 33.3 ± 12.6 years) with MAS treated by stenting in our institution between January 2010 and July 2016 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-day and long-term follow-up clinical outcomes after aorta stenting were assessed., Results: Stenting was successful in all patients. The mean stenosis and peak systolic pressure gradient of aorta lesions were reduced from 81.3 ± 8.0% and 70.7 ± 18.4 mm Hg to 14.7 ± 8.3% and 14.0 ± 5.8 mm Hg immediately after the 54 stents were implanted. One patient developed retroperitoneal hemorrhage and one developed flow-limiting dissection that involved bilateral renal arteries perioperatively. Both patients recovered without sequela. Compared with baseline, the ankle brachial index (0.92 ± 0.19 vs. 0.75 ± 0.22), mean systolic blood pressure (149.5 ± 19.1 vs. 179.0 ± 28.4 mm Hg) and antihypertensive drugs (1.1 ± 0.7 vs. 3.1 ± 0.9) significantly improved after an average follow-up of 3.1 years (all P < .001). A total of 5 (10.9%) patients developed in-stent restenosis, which were resolved by reintervention (restenting in 3 patients and re-angioplasty alone in 2 patients). No major adverse events occurred during follow up., Conclusions: Percutaneous aortic stenting is highly efficacious and safe in treating patients with MAS caused by TA with good immediate and long-term clinical outcomes., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate 1-year results and influencing factors of carotid artery stenting (CAS) before open heart surgery (OHS)., Background: Currently, the clinical outcomes and influencing factors of CAS followed by OHS still remain controversial., Methods: Three hundred twenty-three consecutive patients scheduled for CAS and OHS were enrolled in this study. The primary endpoint was a composite of major stroke, myocardial infarction, or death within 1 year after CAS., Results: The incidence of the primary endpoint was 5.6% (18/323). The Cox regression analysis revealed that an interval of ≤5 days between CAS and OHS (HR, 4.85, 95% CI, 1.87-12.58; P = 0.001), congestive heart failure (HR, 4.08, 95% CI, 1.45-11.51; P = 0.008), and renal insufficiency (HR, 4.56, 95% CI, 1.28-16.32; P = 0.020) could independently predict the incidence of the primary endpoint. The rate of the primary endpoint from CAS to 30 days after OHS was 4.6% (15/323). An interval of ≤5 days between CAS and OHS (OR, 4.51, 95% CI, 1.52-13.36; P = 0.007) and congestive heart failure (OR, 5.32, 95% CI, 1.63-17.43; P = 0.006) were identified as independent risk factors for the primary endpoint rate from CAS to 30 days after OHS by logistic regression analysis., Conclusions: CAS followed by OHS is a safe and effective treatment for patients with concomitant carotid and cardiac disease within 1-year follow up. The interval between CAS and OHS, congestive heart failure, and renal insufficiency could obviously influence the 1-year results., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of subclavian artery stenting for coronary-subclavian steal syndrome (CSSS)., Background: CSSS is a rare cause of myocardial ischemia due to ipsilateral subclavian artery stenosis in patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft. However, current knowledge of the optimal therapy for CSSS is limited., Methods: The clinical data of 37 patients (33 male; mean age 65 ± 6 years) with CSSS who had undergone subclavian artery stenting between April 2007 and December 2015 were analyzed., Results: The time elapsed between bypass surgery and the diagnosis of CSSS was 6.3 ± 4.3 years (median 5.2 years, range 1.3 months to 17.8 years). The technical success rate was 97.3% (100% for stenosis, 85.7% for occluded lesions). One patient experienced a transient ischemic attack; a second patient developed flow-limiting dissection involving the ostium of the internal mammary artery; and a third patient had a puncture site hematoma. The mean stenosis of target lesions decreased from 87.6 ± 10.6% to 5.9 ± 5.0% immediately after the procedure. A total of 35 (94.6%) patients were discharged with a complete remission of myocardial ischemia. During a follow-up of 44 ± 32 (range 6-112) months, no patient suffered from stroke or myocardial infarction. Stent-restenosis related unstable angina developing in one patient at 36 months and in another patient at 11 months, both of whom were relieved after balloon angioplasty and remained asymptomatic until the last follow-up., Conclusion: Subclavian artery stenting is feasible and safe in patients with CSSS, with a low incidence of perioperative complications and stent restenosis rate. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: To investigate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of endovascular therapy for Angio-seal TM -related acute limb ischemia., Background: Currently, limited data are available on the optimal treatment strategy for Angio-seal TM -related acute lower limb ischemia., Methods: The prospectively maintained patient database of our institution was retrospectively searched to identify all patients who developed acute lower limb ischemia after use of the Angio-Seal TM and received endovascular treatment from January 2010 to February 2016. The clinical and follow-up data were evaluated., Results: Thirty-two patients with Angio-Seal TM -related acute limb ischemia underwent endovascular therapy, resulting in an approximated incidence of 0.29% of all implanted devices. The overall procedural success rate was 96.9%. With regard to the patients who underwent successful endovascular treatment, the culprit lesion was located in the common femoral artery in 22 (71.0%) cases, the femoral artery bifurcation in 3 (9.7%) cases and the superficial femoral artery in 6 (19.4%) cases. Ten (31.3%) patients had thrombosis in other distal lower limb arteries ipsilateral to Angio-seal TM use. Eighteen (58.1%) patients underwent balloon angioplasty alone, while nine (29.0%) patients underwent balloon angioplasty and thrombolysis, and four (12.9%) patients underwent stent implantation. One patient suffered from minor bleeding at the site of application of the Angio-seal TM . During an average of 43.5 ± 22.9 months of follow-up, three patients with symptomatic restenosis underwent a second successful balloon angioplasty and remained asymptomatic until the last follow-up., Conclusions: Balloon angioplasty with selective thrombolysis or stent placement was safe and effective, with a low incidence of complication and restenosis. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: To assess 30-day outcomes and the optimal interval between carotid artery stenting (CAS) and open heart surgery (OHS)., Background: Whether or not they show symptoms of carotid atherosclerosis, patients with significant carotid stenosis who underwent OHS face a high risk of perioperative stroke. Planning appropriate treatment for carotid stenosis before OHS has become an important clinical issue., Methods: From January 2005 to June 2010, 154 inpatients scheduled for CAS and OHS were recruited and followed up for 30 days after OHS. The primary end point was a composite of major stroke or neurological death. The secondary end points included a composite of major stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or any death, minor stroke, and acute kidney injury (AKI)., Results: The incidence of the primary end point, the composite of major stroke, MI or any death, minor stroke and AKI was 3.2%, 5.8%, 2.6%, and 4.5%, respectively. Only an interval between CAS and OHS of ≤5 days could independently predict the incidence of the primary end point (OR, 14.06, 95% CI, 1.52-130.13; P=0.020). Moreover, congestive heart failure (OR, 7.07, 95% CI, 1.55-21.27; P=0.012) and an interval between CAS and OHS of ≤5 days (OR, 7.05, 95% CI, 1.58-31.40; P=0.010) were identified as independent risk factors for the composite of major stroke, MI, or any death., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that CAS followed by OHS is safe and feasible. More importantly, an interval between CAS and OHS of >5 days may decrease periprocedural complications, especially major stroke and neurological death., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)