Search

Glioblastoma is diagnosed by biopsy or, if clinically feasible, tumor resection. However, emerging evidence suggests that this surgical intervention may increase the risk of tumor cell spread. It has been hypothesized that the damage to the tumor leads to infiltration of immune cells that consequently form an environment that favors tumor cell motility. In mouse glioma models, it was previously found that biopsy induced migration of tumor cells in vivo and that recruitment of monocytes from the blood was involved in this effect. However, the role of neutrophils in this process is still unclear. Here, we study the contribution of neutrophils on the pro-migratory effect of surgical interventions in glioma. Using repetitive intravital microscopy, in vivo migration of glioma tumor cells before and after biopsy was compared in mice systemically depleted of neutrophils. Interestingly, macrophages/microglia were almost completely absent from neutrophil-depleted tumors, indicating that neutrophils may be indirectly involved in biopsy-induced migration of glioma tumor cells through the recruitment of macrophages to the tumor. To further investigate whether neutrophils have the potential to also directly promote glioblastoma tumor cell migration, we performed in vitro migration assays using human neutrophils. Indeed, wound-healing of human primary glioblastoma tumor cell lines was promoted by human neutrophils. The pro-migratory effects of human neutrophils on glioblastoma tumor cells could also be recapitulated in transwell migration assays, indicating that soluble factor(s) are involved. We therefore provide evidence for both an indirect and direct involvement of neutrophils in tumor spread following biopsy of glioblastoma tumors.

A malfunction of the innate immune response in COVID-19 is associated with eosinopenia, particularly in more severe cases. This study tested the hypothesis that this eosinopenia is COVID-19 specific and is associated with systemic activation of eosinophils. Blood of 15 healthy controls and 75 adult patients with suspected COVID-19 at the ER were included before PCR testing and analyzed by point-of-care automated flow cytometry (CD10, CD11b, CD16, and CD62L) in the absence or presence of a formyl peptide (fNLF). Forty-five SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive patients were grouped based on disease severity. PCR negative patients with proven bacterial ( n = 20) or other viral ( n = 10) infections were used as disease controls. Eosinophils were identified with the use of the FlowSOM algorithm. Low blood eosinophil numbers (<100 cells/μL; p < 0.005) were found both in patients with COVID-19 and with other infectious diseases, albeit less pronounced. Two discrete eosinophil populations were identified in healthy controls both before and after activation with fNLF based on the expression of CD11b. Before activation, the CD11b bright population consisted of 5.4% (CI 95% = 3.8, 13.4) of total eosinophils. After activation, this population of CD11b bright cells comprised nearly half the population (42.21%, CI 95% = 35.9, 54.1). Eosinophils in COVID-19 had a similar percentage of CD11b bright cells before activation (7.6%, CI 95% = 4.5, 13.6), but were clearly refractory to activation with fNLF as a much lower percentage of cells end up in the CD11b bright fraction after activation (23.7%, CI 95% = 18.5, 27.6; p < 0.001). Low eosinophil numbers in COVID-19 are associated with refractoriness in responsiveness to fNLF. This might be caused by migration of fully functional cells to the tissue.