Search

The effects of Na[trans-RuCl4(DMSO)Im] (NAMI), Na[trans-RuCl4(TMSO)Ind] (TIND) and Na[trans-RuCl4(TMSO)Iq] TEQU) were tested in vitro on TLX5 lymphoma cells in comparison to cisplatin by means of the sulforhodamine-B test SRB) for protein content determination, by acridine orange and propidium iodide staining and by means of the bromodeoxyuridine test, for cell cycle modifications. After l h drug exposure with metal-based drugs, TLX5 lymphoma cells require a further 72 h in vitro cultivation to show alteration of cell cycle. Ruthenium compounds show a different pattern of effects: TEQU causes the same dose-dependent cytotoxicity and DNA fragmentation shown by cisplatin, TIND reduces absorbance with the SRB test and slightly increases S and G2M populations with a time-dependent drug exposure of tumour cells, and NAMI is virtually devoid of any detectable effect. By in vivo bioassay of in vitro treated tumour cells, TIND and TEQU are effective independently of the time of drug exposure of tumour cells, this effect being confirmed by the same cell uptake of ruthenium after l or 4 h treatment, determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy. These data stress the lack of the involvement of direct cytotoxic effects in the potent anti-metastatic action of NAMI.

A series of 18 ruthenium(III) complexes, structurally related to the selective antimetastatic drug Na[trans-RuCl4(DMSO)Im], and characterized by the presence of sulfoxide and nitrogen-donor ligands were tested on TLX5 lymphoma and some of them on MCa mammary carcinoma to evaluate the dependence of the degree of cytotoxicity and of antimetastatic activity on the chemical properties. In vitro cytotoxicity is present only at high concentrations (> 10(-4) M), depends upon lipophilicity and is markedly affected by the presence of 5% serum or plasma samples in the culture medium. The comparison of the effects on in vitro cytotoxicity with in vivo antitumor and antimetastatic action points out that these compounds reduce metastasis formation by a mechanism unrelated to a direct tumor cell cytotoxicity. If on one hand Na[trans-RuCl4(TMSO)Iq], the compound that shows the most potent in vitro cytotoxic effects, is the least effective against metastases, on the other Na[trans-RuCl4(DMSO)Im], the compound that better reduces metastasis formation, is rather devoid of cytotoxic effects on tumor cells kept in vitro. In particular, Na[trans-RuCl4(DMSO)Im] seems to distinguish between artificially induced metastases and spontaneous metastases and reduces only the former by a cytotoxic mechanism. Out of all the tested compounds, with the exception of Na[trans-RuCl4(DMSO)Ox], Na[trans-RuCl4(DMSO)Im] is confirmed to be the most selective antimetastatic agent of the group.