Search

Your search keyword '"Biffi M."' showing total 5 results
Start Over Author "Biffi M." Journal chest
5 results on '"Biffi M."'

1. Left superior vena cava persistence in patients undergoing pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: a 10-year experience

Author

Biffi, M, Boriani, Giuseppe, Frabetti, L, Bronzetti, G, and Branzi, A.

Subjects
Male, Sick Sinus Syndrome, Pacemaker, Artificial, Vena Cava, Superior, Vena Cava, Ventricular, Female, Heart Block, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Defibrillators, Implantable, Pacemaker, Tachycardia, Superior, Artificial, Implantable, Defibrillators
Abstract

The persistence of a left superior vena cava (LSVC) has been observed in 0.3% of the general population as established by autopsy. In the adult population, it is an important anatomic finding if a left superior approach to the heart is considered. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of a LSVC in patients undergoing pacemaker (PM) and cardioverter-defibrillator (CD) implantation.We observed the prevalence of LSVC during a 10-year period; each patient undergoing PM or transvenous CD implantation received a left cephalic/left subclavian venous approach to the heart. With this technique, LSVC persistence is easily diagnosed during lead placement.A total of 1,139 patients consecutively underwent PM implantation during 10 years: 4 patients had persistent LSCV (0.34%). Among 115 patients undergoing CD implantation, 2 patients with LSVC (1.7%) were observed. Overall LSVC persistence was found in 6 of 1,254 patients (0.47%). Two patients, one of whom had no right superior vena cava (RSVC), received a left-sided PM, whereas two other patients received right-sided devices. Both CD patients received a left-sided active-can device: the first patient with a right-sided lead tunneled to the left pectoral pocket, as a result of poor catheter handling through the LSVC and coronary sinus, and the second patient with a screw-in lead from LSVC. Long-term follow-up of these patients (average +/- SD, 41 +/- 26 months) revealed absence of lead dislodgment and appropriate device function regardless of lead implantation site.Persistence of LSVC in adults undergoing PM/CD implantation is similar to that of the general population (0.47% in our study). The left-sided implant can be achieved by stylet shaping and by use of active fixation leads in most patients, with a reliable outcome at short term in addition to appropriate device performance at follow-up. Assessment of the RSVC is advisable when planning a right-sided implantation, since a minority of patients lacks this vessel.

Published
2001

2. Evaluation of myocardial injury following repeated internal atrial shocks by monitoring serum cardiac troponin I levels.

Author

Boriani, Giuseppe, Biffi, Mauro, Cervi, Vittoria, Bronzetti, Gabriele, Magagnoli, Giorgia, Zannoli, Romano, Branzi, Angelo, Boriani, G, Biffi, M, Cervi, V, Bronzetti, G, Magagnoli, G, Zannoli, R, and Branzi, A

Subjects
ELECTRIC countershock, ATRIAL fibrillation, CARDIOMYOPATHIES
Abstract

Introduction: Electrical shocks delivered for atrial cardioversion (CV) may cause myocardial damage. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of myocardial injury caused by repeated intracardiac shocks delivered for low-energy internal atrial CV.Methods and Results: Thirty-five patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) of different etiologies underwent CV with delivery of synchronized biphasic shocks (3.0/3.0 ms) between two catheters positioned in the right atrium and the coronary sinus. Shocks were delivered according to a step-up protocol (50 V, 180 V, then steps of 40 to 56 V up to 500 V, if necessary). In 23 patients, AF was reinduced after baseline CV, and CV was repeated. Myocardial injury was monitored by measuring cardiac troponin I (cTnI) serum concentrations in blood samples taken at baseline and at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after the procedure, by means of an immunoenzymologic assay (normal values, < or =0.6 ng/mL). A mean (+/- SD) of 6.9 +/- 3.4 shocks per patient were delivered (range, 2 to 17). Shocks delivered in each patient had a maximal energy of 7.3 +/- 4.0 J (range, 1.7 to 15.7). In 20 patients (57%), no evidence of myocardial injury (cTnI level, < or = 0.6 ng/mL) was found. In 13 patients (37%), mildly elevated cTnI levels (range, 0.7 to 1.4 ng/mL) in samples taken 4 to 12 h after CV suggested minor myocardial injury. In two patients (6%), higher cTnI levels were found in samples taken 4 to 8 h after CV (peak, 1.7 and 2.4 ng/mL), indicating a necrotic damage. Patients with no cTnI elevation, with mild cTnI elevation, or with cTnI levels >or =1.5 ng/mL did not differ significantly with respect to the total number of shocks delivered, the mean amount of energy delivered, and the cumulative amount of energy delivered. No clinical complications were observed.Conclusions: Following internal CV with the delivery of repeated shocks, minor elevations of cTnI serum levels could be detected in a significant proportion of patients, and this suggests subtle asymptomatic minor myocardial injury. The elevations of cTnI levels do not appear to be related to the number of shocks or to the amount of energy delivered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2000
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results