Search

Long-acting beta(2)-agonists (LABAs) have been shown to be effective first-line bronchodilators in the treatment of COPD patients, and inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) have been shown to reduce the frequency and/or severity of exacerbations in COPD patients. The concomitant use of a LABA and an ICS can influence both airway obstruction (ie, smooth muscle contraction, increased cholinergic tone, and loss of elastic recoil), and airway inflammation (ie, increased numbers of neutrophils, macrophages, and CD8+ lymphocytes, elevated interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels, and protease/antiprotease imbalance). They are also able to reduce the total number of bacteria adhering to the respiratory mucosa in a concentration-dependent manner without altering the bacterial tropism for mucosa, and to preserve ciliated cells. Several clinical trials support the concept of inhaled combination therapy with LABAs and corticosteroids in stable COPD patients. This type of therapy not only improves airflow obstruction but also provides clinical benefits, as manifested by sustained reduction in overall symptoms, improvements in health-related quality of life, and reductions in exacerbations. All of these effects are very important because, despite recent advances in our understanding of COPD and its treatment, therapy remains suboptimal for a considerable number of patients.

In this 4-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study, the dose-effect relationship of four doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate (50, 100, 200, and 400 micrograms twice daily) was investigated and compared with beclomethasone dipropionate, 200 micrograms twice daily. A total of 672 patients with moderate asthma currently receiving 1,000 micrograms/d or less of an inhaled steroid were recruited. The study demonstrated a significant dose-related improvement in lung function with fluticasone propionate. Linear dose-related increases were observed in morning (increase per doubling dose was 4.3 L/min; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 1.8, 6.8 L/min; p = 0.001) and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (increase per doubling dose was 3.0 L/min; 95 percent CI, 0.5, 5.5 L/min; p = 0.017), clinic lung function (at 4 weeks, increase in percent predicted PEFR per doubling dose = 1.1 percent; 95 percent CI, 0.2, 2.1 percent; p = 0.022; increase in percent predicted FEV1 per doubling dose = 1.1 percent; 95 percent CI, 0.3, 1.9 percent; p = 0.10:increase in percent predicted FVC per doubling dose = 1.3 percent, 95 percent CI, 0.5, 2.1 percent; p = 0.001), and the percentage of symptom-free days over days 1 to 14 of treatment (increase per doubling dose = 1.9, 95 percent CI, 0.0, 3.9; p = 0.048). There was also a dose-related reduction in extra bronchodilator usage (days 1 to 14 p = 0.002; days 15 to 28 p = 0.01). In addition, there was a significant decrease in diurnal variation with increasing doses of fluticasone propionate (decrease per doubling dose = 2.0 L/min, 95 percent CI, 0.4; p = 0.024). The number of asthma exacerbations was also reduced as the dose of fluticasone propionate increased. Fluticasone propionate was well tolerated, adverse events were few, and there was a similar incidence in all groups. Furthermore, there was no evidence of any hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis suppression. The data from the study were consistent with other clinical studies that have shown fluticasone propionate to be more potent than beclomethasone dipropionate in terms of improvement in lung function. In conclusion, this study provided evidence of a dose-related improvement in asthma control for fluticasone propionate in the dose range 100 to 800 micrograms daily, in patients with moderate asthma.

Introduction: Positive expiratory airway pressure seems to dilate narrowed or collapsed airways, but this may be accompanied by a maintained and harmful increase in resting lung volume in obstructive pulmonary disease., Purpose: To evaluate the influence of inhaled terbutaline and positive expiratory pressure (PEP) on airway resistance (Raw) and functional residual capacity (FRC) in bronchial asthma., Design: Randomized crossover design, single blind with regard to inhaled medication, open with regard to PEP (PEP can be felt)., Material and Methods: Ten patients with bronchial asthma inhaled placebo and terbutaline in doses of 0.125 mg, 0.5 mg, and 1.5 mg by cone spacer combined with a facemask giving 0, 10, or 15 cm H2O PEP on separate days. FRC and Raw were measured by body plethysmography before and after inhalations. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance with terbutaline dose and PEP as factor levels., Results: The effect of terbutaline: Raw decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) after 0.125 mg and 1.5 mg. The FRC did not change significantly. The effect of PEP: Raw decreased, but significantly only when the dose of 1.5 mg terbutaline was excluded from the analysis. Raw decreased with PEP 10 and 15 cm H2O, mean 0.6 (95 percent CI: -1.1, -0.2) and 0.9 (95 percent CI: -1.3, -0.4) cm H2O/L/s. The FRC did not change significantly with the PEP level., Conclusion: PEP only had influence on Raw when insufficient doses of terbutaline were inhaled, whereas once an efficient dose of terbutaline was administered, significant bronchodilation was achieved with or without PEP. Positive expiratory pressure did not increase FRC.

The influence of positive expiratory pressure (PEP) applied during inhalation of a beta 2-agonist in treatment of bronchial asthma was investigated in a randomized crossover study with two-week treatment periods. In one period, two puffs (0.5 mg) of terbutaline was given from a metered dose inhaler and inhaled through a device consisting of a conespacer connected to a facemask giving PEP (10 to 15 cm H2O). In a second period, terbutaline 0.5 mg was inhaled similarly but without PEP, and in a third period placebo spray was inhaled with PEP. Treatments were given three times daily. Peak expiratory flow (PEF) was measured before and after each inhalation and symptom scores for dyspnea, cough, and mucus production were noted in a diary. All treatments increased PEF significantly (p less than 0.0001). The mean increase was 32 L/min during treatment with terbutaline and PEP. This was greater than the increase of 25 L/min during terbutaline treatment (p = 0.005). The increase in PEF during terbutaline treatment was significantly higher than the achieved 18 L/min during PEP (p = 0.026). The study showed improved bronchodilation when PEP was combined with inhalation of beta 2-agonist compared with beta 2-agonist alone.

Long-term treatment of chronic bronchitis with chest physiotherapy with or without positive expiratory pressure (PEP) by mask was studied in 43 patients randomly allocated to PEP treatment (PEP group, 20 patients) and conventional chest physiotherapy (control group, 23 patients). After instruction, the treatments were self-administered twice daily for 12 months (34 patients) and 5 months (9 patients). Twice weekly, patients filled in a diary concerning symptoms. The PEP group had significantly less cough and less mucus production. The number of acute exacerbations were calculated from the diaries and were lower in the PEP group compared to the control group, and 85 percent of the patients in the PEP group were free from acute exacerbations versus 48 percent in the control group. The PEP group also used less antibiotics and mucolytics. The PEP group had a small increase in FEV1 of mean 62 ml compared to a small decrease of 43 ml for the control group. Treatment with a simple PEP device can reduce morbidity in patients with chronic bronchitis and may preserve lung function from a more rapid decline.