Search

Smith skilfully demonstrates that understanding the Chinese political and intellectual contexts within which different conceptions of Asianism were articulated is key to grasping why so many Chinese participated in Asianist discourse, often "in dialogue with Japanese Asianism" (p. 16). $55.00; £44.95; €49.50 ISBN 978-0-6742-6024-5 For a long time, scholarly interest in Asianism (also known as Pan-Asianism) focused on Japan and its role in justifying Japan's empire in East and South-East Asia. I Chinese Asianism i is highly recommended to everyone interested in Chinese intellectual and political history, China-Japan and China-Asia relations. [Extracted from the article]

Rare earth elements (REE) captured a startled world's attention during the 2010 Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands crisis, when it appeared that China withheld access to them during its border dispute with Japan. China asserts that its sovereign right to environmental regulation and national production quotas is unassailable. However, China's trade measures appear to be inconsistent with WTO rules, as well as with environmental protection and conservation, since they incentivize illegal mining and smuggling practices. In an upcoming case (DS431), the United States, the European Union, Japan and 16 third parties will argue before the WTO that China's trade measures on rare earths, tungsten and molybdenum constitute discriminatory behaviour and are illegal. This raises the question of whether China is inappropriately using the environment as a defence against allegations that its rare earth trade policies are in violation of its WTO obligations. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

This article represents the first attempt to examine the Chinese elite's threat perception of Japan using statistics to analyse what, if any, differences exist among the People's Liberation Army, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Chinese economic institutes. It seeks to answer two questions that have not previously been addressed in the literature. First, has there been a change in perception of the Japanese threat in these three sectors over time? And if so, what can we deduce about the causes of this change? This study finds that there have indeed been two major shifts in China's threat perception of Japan since the 1980s, one in the late 1980s and the other in the mid-1990s. It also finds that there were no differences between sectors as to the direction and timing of these shifts. It suggests that Japan's military build-up in the late 1980s and the strengthening of the US-Japan alliance from 1996 onwards are what prompted these shifts in China's threat perception. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]