Search

The disruption of the circadian timing system (CTS), which rhythmically controls cellular metabolism and proliferation, accelerated experimental cancer progression. A measure of CTS function in cancer patients could thus provide novel prediction information for outcomes, and help to identify novel specific therapies. The rest-activity circadian rhythm is a reliable and non-invasive CTS biomarker, which was monitored using a wrist watch accelerometer for 2 days in 436 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The relative percentage of activity in-bed versus out-of-bed (I < O) constituted the tested CTS measure, whose prognostic value for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was determined in a pooled analysis of three patient cohorts with different treatment exposures. Median OS was 21.6 months [17.8-25.5] for patients with I < O above the median value of 97.5% as compared to 11.9 months [10.4-13.3] for those with a lower I < O (Log-rank p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses retained continuous I < O as a joint predictor of both OS and PFS, with respective hazard ratios (HR) of 0.954 ( p < 0.001) and 0.970 ( p < 0.001) for each 1% increase in I < O. HRs had similar values in all the patient subgroups tested. The circadian physiology biomarker I < O constitutes a robust and independent quantitative predictor of cancer patient outcomes, that can be easily and cost-effectively measured during daily living. Interventional studies involving 24-h schedules of clock-targeted drugs, light intensity, exercise and/or meals are needed for testing the relevance of circadian synchronization for the survival of patients with disrupted rhythms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Circadian clocks control cellular proliferation and drug metabolism over the 24 h. However, circadian chronomodulated chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (chronoFLO4) offered no survival benefit as compared with the non-time-stipulated FOLFOX2, in an international randomized trial involving patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (EORTC 05963). The authors hypothesized that treatment near maximum tolerated dose could disrupt circadian clocks thus impairing the efficacy of chronoFLO4 but not of FOLFOX2. Patients with available data (N == 556) were categorized into three subgroups according to the worst grade (G) of neutropenia experienced during treatment. Distinct multivariate models with time-dependent covariates were constructed for each treatment schedule. Neutropenia incidence (all grades) was 33%% on chronoFLO4 and 61%% on FOLFOX2 ( p < .0001), and G3-4 were 7%% and 25%%, respectively ( p < .0001). Neutropenia was significantly more frequent in women than men on either schedule (FOLFOX2, p == .003; chronoFLO4, p == .04). Median survival was 20.7 mo in patients with G3-4 neutropenia versus 12.5 mo in neutropenia-free patients on FOLFOX2 ( p < .0001). Corresponding figures were 13.7 and 19.4 mo, respectively, on chronoFLO4 ( p == .36). Multivariate analysis confirmed occurrence of severe neutropenia independently predicted for better overall survival on FOLFOX2 (HR == 0.56; p == .015), and worse survival on chronoFLO4 (HR == 1.77, p == .06), with a significant interaction test ( p < .0001). Prediction of better survival in neutropenic patients on FOLFOX2 supports the administration of conventional chemotherapy near maximum tolerated dose. The opposite trend shown here for chronoFLO4 supports the novel concept of jointly optimized hematologic tolerability and efficacy through personalized circadian-timed therapy. (Author correspondence: ) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Studies in animals synchronized with an alternation of 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness have showed that hematological and systemic toxicities could be reduced if vinorelbine were administered 19 or 23 hours after light onset (HALO), corresponding to 17:00 and 21:00 h in diurnally active humans. This trial aimed to define the least toxic time of vinorelbine administration in metastatic breast cancer patients. Initially, the study treatment consisted of three courses of vinorelbine of 30 mg/m2/d on D1 and D6 and chronomodulated 5-fluorouracil of 850 mg/m2 from D2 to D5 every 21 days. Ninety metastatic breast cancer patients were randomized to receive vinorelbine at one of the eight possible dosing times. Further to the recommendations of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee, the vinorelbine dose was reduced to 25 mg/m2/d midway through the study. The primary objective of the study was detection of the least toxic time based on the incidence of grade 3-4 (G3-4) neutropenia. To show a significant result, the 90% confidence interval width of the least toxic time had to be<6 h. The least toxic time detection based on the incidence of other toxicities was also analyzed. The time of least drug toxic was estimated using a logistic regression model assuming that the logit transformation of the toxicity rate follows a sinusoidal distribution over 24 h. The bootstrap technique was used to obtain the 90% confidence interval. The least toxic time of G3-4 neutropenia was observed at 21:00 h with a non-significant 90% CI. Secondary endpoint analyses indicated the least toxic time could differ when based on other toxicity parameters (e.g., a significant least toxic time of 17:00 h was observed for G3-4 leucopenia), in agreement with animal data. The least toxic time of 10:30 h was estimated for any G3-4 gastrointestinal toxicity. This results of this study do not allow us to recommend an optimal time for vinorelbine administration. It has highlighted, however, the inherent methodological difficulties in the conduct of such a trial in the human setting. It indicates that future optimal time-finding trials should have tolerability and/or activity as the primary endpoint in place of a particular toxicity. The randomized optimal time-finding design may be used to identify the best time of chemotherapy administration. (Author correspondence: bcoudert@dijon.fnclcc.fr) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article reviews the experimental and clinical data that form the basis for the chronotherapy of lung carcinoma, specifically, nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Circadian rhythms in cell kinetics, immunological and endocrinological endpoints, and tumor markers are reviewed. Chronopharmacology and chronotolerance studies on laboratory animals and clinical observations on cancer patients involving the main drugs active in lung carcinoma have prompted prospective Phase I-III studies to evaluate the application of chronobiologic concepts in the treatment of NSCLC. Circadian rhythmicity in host tolerance (chronotolerance) to medications has been confirmed in two prospective randomized lung cancer trials; a large phase II study has established the value of chronobiologic concepts to improve the therapeutic index of advanced NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]