Search

Background: Use of endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting has developed into a routine surgical approach at many cardiothoracic surgical centers. The association between this technique and long-term morbidity and mortality has recently been called into question. The present report describes the use of open versus endoscopic vein harvesting and risk of mortality and repeat revascularization in northern New England during a time period (2001 to 2004) in which both techniques were being performed., Methods and Results: From 2001 to 2004, 8542 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 52.5% with endoscopic vein harvesting. Surgical discretion dictated the vein harvest approach. The main outcomes were death and repeat revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting) within 4 years of the index admission. The use of endoscopic vein harvesting increased from 34% in 2001 to 75% in 2004. In general, patients undergoing endoscopic vein harvesting had greater disease burden. Endoscopic vein harvesting was associated with an increased adjusted risk of bleeding requiring a return to the operating room (2.4 versus 1.7; P=0.03) but a decreased risk of leg wound infections (0.2 versus 1.1; P<0.001). Use of endoscopic vein harvesting was associated with a significant reduction in long-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.92) but a nonsignificant increased risk of repeat revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.74). Similar results were obtained in propensity-stratified analysis., Conclusions: During 2001 to 2004 in northern New England, the use of endoscopic vein harvesting was not associated with harm. There was a nonsignificant increase in repeat revascularization, and survival was not decreased.

Background: Review of the clinical and therapeutic implications of difference in arm blood pressure detected preoperatively in patients having heart surgery., Methods and Results: Prospective study of 53 patients (Group 1) with gradient and comparison with a group of 175 patients without gradient (Group 2). All patients had preoperative carotid duplex interrogation and operative epiaortic scanning. There was no statistical difference regarding age, sex, status, redo, diabetes, ejection fraction, prior myocardial infarct, hyperlipidemia, or creatinine level. Risks factors for Group 1 included peripheral vascular disease (P<0.0001) and cerebrovascular symptoms (P=0.0196). Severe carotid disease (>80% stenosis) was seen in 41.5% of Group 1 and 13.7% of Group 2 (P<0.0001) patients. Severe atherosclerotic proximal aortic disease was found in 39.6% of Group 1 and 10.8% of Group 2 (P<0.0001) patients. There were 7 patients with strokes in Group 1 (13.20%) and 9 in Group 2 (5.14%; P=0.06). Four patients died in Group 1 (7.54%) and 10 died in Group 2 (5.71%; P=0.74)., Conclusion: Brachial gradient is a marker for increased carotid and proximal atherosclerotic aortic disease. Preoperative arch study at the time of catheterization is strongly recommended, as well as preoperative carotid Doppler and operative epiaortic ultrasound.

Background: Obesity is frequently cited as a risk factor for adverse outcomes of major surgery. The results of prior studies of the relationship between obesity and risk of adverse outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have been contradictory because of insufficient power to assess relatively infrequent outcomes or data to adjust for confounding factors., Methods and Results: Data on patient age, sex, height, weight, medical history, current clinical status, and treatment factors were assessed prospectively among 11101 consecutive patients undergoing CABG. Body mass index (BMI) was used as the measure of obesity and was categorized as nonobese (1st to 74th percentiles), obese (75th to 94th percentiles), or severely obese (95th to 100th percentiles). Adverse outcomes occurring in-hospital, including mortality, intraoperative/postoperative cerebrovascular accident (CVA), postoperative bleeding, and sternal wound infection, were defined prospectively. Associations between obesity and postoperative outcomes were assessed by use of logistic regression to adjust for potentially confounding variables. Although obesity was not associated with increased mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.16; P=.261) or postoperative CVA (adjusted OR, 1.06; P=.765), risks of sternal wound infection were substantially increased in the obese (adjusted OR, 2.10; confidence interval [CI], 1.45 to 3.06; P<.001) and severely obese (adjusted OR, 2.74; CI, 1.49 to 5.02; P=.001). On the other hand, rates of postoperative bleeding were significantly lower in the obese (adjusted OR, 0.66; CI, 0.49 to 0.90; P=.009) and severely obese (adjusted OR, 0.40; CI, 0.20 to 0.81; P=.011)., Conclusions: With the exception of sternal wound infection, the perception among clinicians that obesity predisposes to various postoperative complications with CABG is not supported by these data. Further work is needed to understand the apparent protective effect of obesity on risks of postoperative bleeding.

Background: There is evidence that patients who receive an internal mammary artery graft (IMA) during coronary artery bypass surgery have increased long-term survival. However, an IMA is not used in all patients., Methods and Results: We studied the use of IMA grafts among 7944 patients undergoing initial, isolated coronary artery bypass surgery in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont from 1992 to 1995. Overall, the IMA graft was used in 82% of patients; of these, 97.2% had left IMA grafts. The use of the IMA graft varied considerably by patient and disease factors. Women received an IMA graft significantly less often (76% versus 85% in men, P<.01). Older patients (> or =75 years) were less likely to receive an IMA graft (67% versus 86%, P<.001). Smaller BSA was also associated with lower rates of IMA grafts in both sexes; however, men and women with BSA <1.8 m2 received an IMA graft at about the same rate. In general, more sick and more urgent patients had lower rates of IMA use. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <40% received an IMA less often than those with an ejection fraction > or =60% (77% versus 85%, P<.01). Patients with a greater number of diseased coronary vessels received an IMA more often (one, 78%; two, 82%; three, 85%). IMA use varied significantly by priority of surgery, with elective patients receiving an IMA 88% of the time, urgent 83%, and emergent 51% (Ptrend<.01). The use of the IMA graft varied from 42% to 95% among individual surgeons. Surgeons were consistent in their patterns of IMA graft use for specific risk groups. All surgeons had lower rates of IMA use among older patients, lower rates of IMA among women, and lower rates of IMA use among emergent or urgent patients. However, "low-use" surgeons had consistently lower rates of use within these patient groups. The overall rate of IMA graft use increased from 76% in 1992 to 86% in 1995 (Ptrend<.001). IMA graft use increased in all five centers and in all patient subgroups. The largest increases in use were seen among women (from 69% to 83%), among patients older than 75 years (from 55% to 75%), and in emergent patients (from 40% to 72%)., Conclusions: This regional prospective study of IMA graft use in initial coronary artery bypass surgery describes substantial variability in patient groups receiving an IMA as well as increasing IMA graft use over time. It also suggests that the practice patterns of surgeons are an important determinant of IMA use. These data indicate that even more patients could benefit from the use of this technique.