Search

Background— Erectile dysfunction (ED) is associated with coronary artery disease (CAD). In diabetic patients, CAD is often silent. Among diabetic patients with silent CAD, the prevalence of ED has never been evaluated. We investigated whether ED is associated with asymptomatic CAD in type 2 diabetic patients. Methods and Results— We evaluated the prevalence of ED in 133 uncomplicated diabetic men with angiographically verified silent CAD and in 127 diabetic men without myocardial ischemia at exercise ECG, 48-hour ambulatory ECG, and stress echocardiography. The groups were comparable for age and diabetes duration. Patients were screened for ED using the validated International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire. The prevalence of ED was significantly higher in patients with than in those without silent CAD (33.8% versus 4.7%; P =0.000). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that ED, apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism, smoking, microalbuminuria, HDL, and LDL were significantly associated with silent CAD; among these risk factors, ED appeared to be the most efficient predictor of silent CAD (OR, 14.8; 95% CI, 3.8 to 56.9). Conclusions— Our study first shows a strong and independent association between ED and silent CAD in apparently uncomplicated type 2 diabetic patients. If our findings are confirmed, ED may become a potential marker to identify diabetic patients to screen for silent CAD. Moreover, the high prevalence of ED among diabetics with silent CAD suggests the need to perform an exercise ECG before starting a treatment for ED, especially in patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors.

Background— We previously demonstrated that reduced vagal activity and/or increased sympathetic activity identify post–myocardial infarction patients at high risk for cardiac mortality. Simple and inexpensive autonomic markers are necessary to perform autonomic screening in large populations. We tested our hypothesis that abnormally elevated heart rate (HR) responses at the onset of an exercise stress test, which imply rapid vagal withdrawal immediately preceding sympathetic activation, might predict adverse cardiac events in patients with documented coronary artery disease. Methods and Results— The HR increase during the first minute (ΔHR 1 minute ) of a symptom-limited exercise stress test was quantified in 458 patients with documented coronary artery disease. During a 6-year (interquartile range 3.7 to 9.0 years) follow-up, 71 patients experienced adverse cardiac events (21 cardiac deaths, 56 nonfatal myocardial infarctions). In univariate analysis, ΔHR 1 minute ≥12 bpm (above the median value of its distribution) predicted both adverse outcome and cardiac death with a hazard ratio of 5.0 (95% CI 2.7 to 9.1; P P 1 minute remained predictive for both combined end points and for cardiac death. Conclusions— A marked HR increase at the onset of a standard exercise stress test is a novel and easily available parameter that could be clinically useful as an independent predictor of adverse cardiac events, including death, among patients with documented coronary artery disease.

To investigate the mechanism by which nifedipine improves exercise tolerance in patients with coronary artery disease, we studied 14 patients with stable exertional angina and left anterior descending artery disease by measuring great cardiac vein flow (GCVF) and calculating anterior regional coronary resistance (ARCR) during exercise before and after sublingual administration of 20 mg of nifedipine. After nifedipine seven patients (group I) had no increase in exercise capacity and showed a similar magnitude of ST segment depression at peak exercise, while another seven patients (group II) had prolonged exercise duration (p less than .001) with less ST segment depression at peak exercise (p less than .01). Such effects were achieved despite a significant increase in double product, an indirect index of myocardial oxygen consumption. In group I patients no significant change was induced by nifedipine in GCVF or in ARCR either at rest or at peak exercise. In contrast, in group II patients nifedipine significantly increased GCVF at rest (p less than .05) and at peak exercise (p less than .001). Moreover, resting ARCR was decreased (p less than .01) and remained significantly lower at peak exercise (p less than .01) compared with the prenifedipine values. These data show that nifedipine may increase GCVF and decrease ARCR at rest and at peak exercise in patients with left anterior descending artery disease. Such increase in myocardial oxygen supply seems the most likely mechanism by which nifedipine may improve exercise capacity in patients with stable exertional angina.

Four patients with variant angina pectoris exhibited reproducible exercise-induced chest pain and ST-segment elevation. Coronary arterial spasm was documented with arteriography during exercise-induced ST-segment elevation (three patients) or after intravenous administration of ergonovine maleate (one patient). Our observations show that in patients with variant angina exercise can trigger coronary arterial spasm, thus inducing anginal pain and ST-segment elevation.

Sixteen patients with exercise-induced ST-segment elevation and without a history of myocardial infarction or left ventricular aneurysm were studied. Fourteen complained of angina at rest, which was associated with ST-segment elevation in the same leads where it was recorded during exercise, and two patients had only exertional angina. Exercise-induced ST-segment elevation was generally reproducible in subsequent exercise tests performed in different hours of the day, but exercise tests repeated a mean of 15 months later did not induce this electrocardiographic abnormality. All patients had a marked susceptibility to coronary spasm, as shown by the response to the ergonovine test (12 positive tests in 12 patients) and by the occurrence of spontaneous spasm during coronary arteriography in two patients. In addition, coronary arteriography, performed in seven patients at the time of exercise-induced ST-segment elevation, revealed spasm of a major coronary vessel in all. In two patients we documented that exercise-induced ST-segment elevation was accompanied by a decreased coronary blood flow and increased coronary vascular resistance. We conclude that exercise-induced ST-segment elevation in patients without a history of myocardial infarction or left ventricular aneurysm is caused by coronary spasm of a major coronary vessel.