Search

Introduction: It is well established that moderate consumption of red wine is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. Many observational studies have shown that this same benefit could be seen with other alcohol beverages different from wine. However, the correlation between the Brazilian sugarcane liquor (“cachaca”) and CV benefit has not been demonstrated in human trials. Hypothesis: Cachaca causes changes in biomarkers of CV risk in the same proportion as wine. Methods: In this crossover randomized study, healthy individuals were initially designated to have daily moderate alcohol consumption (MAC) of either cachaca or red wine for a period of 4 weeks. MAC, for both drinks, was denoted as a daily dose equivalent of 28g of alcohol for men and 14g for women. Then, after an abstinence period of 7 days, drink types were switched for more 4 weeks. Analysis of CV risk biomarkers were determined before and after each intervention, and consisted of C-reactive protein, lipid profile, platelet aggregability and glycid profile. (This research was funded by FAPESP 2018/09675-4). Results: Of the 37 individuals originally enrolled, 2 refused to continue the study. The average age of the individuals was 41.7 (±15.3 years) and 43.2% were men. Adherence to the protocol was considered essentially ideal, with 100% of regular use in both interventions and only 3 individuals reporting abuse during the study period. There was no significant variation in anthropometric measurements during the study, except for a weight gain (0.6kg) with red wine (p = 0.011). As seen in the table, no significant changes were noted in the inflammatory markers, lipid profile, platelet aggregability nor glycid profile before and after each intervention. Conclusions: This study shows that in healthy individuals, neither red wine nor cachaca changed CV biomarkers related to atherosclerotic progression after 4 weeks of MAC. However, there was a marked weight gain with daily wine consumption.

Background— The importance of complete revascularization remains unclear and contradictory. This current investigation compares the effect of complete revascularization on 10-year survival of patients with stable multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) who were randomly assigned to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Methods and Results— This is a post hoc analysis of the Second Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II), which is a randomized trial comparing treatments in patients with stable multivessel CAD, and preserved systolic ventricular function. We analyzed patients who underwent surgery (CABG) or stent angioplasty (PCI). The survival free of overall mortality of patients who underwent complete (CR) or incomplete revascularization (IR) was compared. Of the 408 patients randomly assigned to mechanical revascularization, 390 patients (95.6%) underwent the assigned treatment; complete revascularization was achieved in 224 patients (57.4%), 63.8% of those in the CABG group and 36.2% in the PCI group ( P =0.001). The IR group had more prior myocardial infarction than the CR group (56.2%×39.2%, P =0.01). During a 10-year follow-up, the survival free of cardiovascular mortality was significantly different among patients in the 2 groups (CR, 90.6% versus IR, 84.4%; P =0.04). This was mainly driven by an increased cardiovascular specific mortality in individuals with incomplete revascularization submitted to PCI ( P =0.05). Conclusions— Our study suggests that in 10-year follow-up, CR compared with IR was associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality, especially due to a higher increase in cardiovascular-specific mortality in individuals submitted to PCI. Clinical Trial Registration Information— URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com . Registration number: ISRCTN66068876.

Background— Coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is a safe, routine procedure. Nevertheless, significant morbidity remains, mostly because of the body’s response to the nonphysiological nature of cardiopulmonary bypass. Few data are available on the effects of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCAB) on cardiac events and long-term clinical outcomes. Methods and Results— In a single-center randomized trial, 308 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomly assigned: 155 to OPCAB and 153 to on-pump CAB (ONCAB). Primary composite end points were death, myocardial infarction, further revascularization (surgery or angioplasty), or stroke. After 5-year follow-up, the primary composite end point was not different between groups (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.22; P =0.21). A statistical difference was found between OPCAB and ONCAB groups in the duration of surgery (240±65 versus 300±87.5 minutes; P P P P P P P Conclusions— No difference was found between groups in the primary composite end point at 5-years follow-up. Although OPCAB surgery was related to a lower number of grafts and higher episodes of atrial fibrillation, it had no significant implications related to long-term outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN66068876.