1. Kuopio Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (KAPS)
- Author
-
Elina Porkkala, Kristiina Nyyssönen, Juha Rummukainen, Jukka T. Salonen, Jong-Soon Park, Rene Belder, and Riitta Salonen
- Subjects
Carotid Artery Diseases ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Arteriosclerosis ,Carotid Artery, Common ,Hypercholesterolemia ,Population ,Placebo ,law.invention ,Cohort Studies ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Double-Blind Method ,Randomized controlled trial ,Risk Factors ,law ,Physiology (medical) ,medicine.artery ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Vitamin E ,Common carotid artery ,Myocardial infarction ,education ,Finland ,Pravastatin ,Ultrasonography ,education.field_of_study ,Cholesterol ,business.industry ,Vascular disease ,Anticholesteremic Agents ,Smoking ,Cholesterol, LDL ,Middle Aged ,Intracranial Arteriosclerosis ,medicine.disease ,Lipids ,Surgery ,Femoral Artery ,chemistry ,Cardiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background The atherosclerotic progression–reducing effect of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering has been established in subjects with severe atherosclerotic disease but not in persons with elevated LDL cholesterols without severe atherosclerosis. KAPS (Kuopio Atherosclerosis Prevention Study) is the first population-based trial in the primary prevention of carotid and femoral atherosclerosis. Methods and Results The eligibility requirements were serum LDL-C ≥4.0 mmol/L and total cholesterol P =.005). In the common carotid artery there was a treatment effect of 66% (95% CI, 30 to 95%; pravastatin 0.010 mm/y; placebo 0.029 mm/y; P P =.056) at the overall mean baseline IMT of 2.0 mm. The treatment effect was larger in subjects with higher baseline IMT values, in smokers and in those with low plasma vitamin E levels. There was no significant treatment effect on atherosclerotic progression in the femoral arteries. Conclusions These data establish the antiatherogenic effect of LDL-C lowering by pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic men in a primary prevention setting and suggest a greater effect in smokers than in nonsmokers.
- Published
- 1995
- Full Text
- View/download PDF