Search

Background: Although destination therapy (DT) is now expected to be a promising strategy for those who are not suitable for heart transplantation in Japan, there has not been any investigation into ineligibility for bridging to implantable left ventricular assist device (I-LVAD) as DT among patients with extracorporeal LVAD., Methods and results: We retrospectively studied 85 patients who had received an extracorporeal LVAD. To assess ineligibility for a bridge to I-LVAD for DT, we defined DT ineligibility (DTI) as BiVAD requirement, death within 6 months, and persistent end-organ dysfunction (medium or high J-VAD risk score) at 6 months after extracorporeal LVAD implantation. DTI was recorded for 32 patients. Uni/multivariate analysis showed that smaller left ventricular diastolic dimension (<64 mm; [odds ratio (OR) 4.522]), continuous hemodiafiltration (OR 4.862), past history of cardiac surgery (OR 6.522), and low serum albumin level (<3.1 g/dl; OR 10.064) were significant predictors of DTI. By scoring 2, 2, 3, 4 points, respectively, considering each OR, we constructed a novel scoring system for DTI (DTI score), which stratified patients into 3 risk strata: low (0-3 points), medium (4-6 points), and high (7-11 points), from the view point of DTI risk (low 8%, medium 46%, high 93%, respectively)., Conclusions: DTI score is a promising tool for predicting ineligibility for I-LVAD as DT before extracorporeal VAD implantation.

Background: Although survival rates have improved for patients receiving implantable continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (I-CF LVAD), postoperative exercise tolerance levels are not necessarily satisfactory., Methods and results: We enrolled 51 patients who had received an I-CF LVAD and underwent follow-up between 2006 and 2014; all patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing 3 months following surgery: 26 (51%) patients achieved peak oxygen consumption (PV̇O2) ≥14 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)and had significantly lower readmission rates for cardiovascular events than those with PV̇O2<14 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)during 2 years of LVAD treatment (17 vs. 43%, P=0.033). Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the preoperative serum albumin (S-ALB) level was an independent predictor for PV̇O2≥14 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)at 3 months (P=0.023, odds ratio 6.132). Patients with persistently normal S-ALB levels during the perioperative period had the lowest preoperative serum C-reactive protein level (S-CRP, 0.7±0.9 mg/dl), and the majority (77%) showed improved exercise tolerance. Conversely, patients with persistently low S-ALB levels during this period had the highest preoperative S-CRP level (2.8±1.2 mg/dl) and did not achieve the test endpoint., Conclusions: Both pre- and postoperative low S-ALB impedes recovery of exercise tolerance after I-CF LVAD surgery, and this may be attributable to inflammatory responses caused by heart failure.

Background: A continuous flow (CF) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has various advantages over a pulsatile flow (PF) LVAD, but the extent of preventing aortic insufficiency (AI) by each type of LVAD remains controversial., Methods and results: Of 86 patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent LVAD implantation between 2006 and 2015, 20 propensity score-matched patients with PF LVADs and 20 with CF LVADs were enrolled in this study. There were no significant differences in the baseline variables of both groups. During the 6-month LVAD treatment, the LV ejection fraction of the PF group was significantly higher than that of the CF group; the PF group also had a wider pulse pressure and less enlargement of the aortic root (P<0.05 for all). Patients in the PF group experienced more frequent opening of the native aortic valve and less AI than those in the CF group (P<0.05 for both). The PF LVAD was explanted in 5 patients (25%), and a CF LVAD was explanted in 1 patient (5%)., Conclusions: Compared with CF LVADs, PF LVADs seem to have an advantage in improving LV reverse remodeling and preventing AI. It may be best to incorporate pulsatility into current CF LVADs while retaining their existing benefits.

Background: Improving quality of life (QOL) has become an important goal in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. We aimed (1) to assess the effect of an implantable LVAD on patients' QOL, (2) to compare LVAD patients' QOL to that of patients in different stages of heart failure (HF), and (3) to identify factors associated with patients' QOL., Methods and results: The QOL of 33 Japanese implantable LVAD patients was assessed using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and Short-form 8 (SF-8), before and at 3 and 6 months afterwards. After LVAD implantation, QOL significantly improved [MLHFQ, SF-8 physical component score (PCS), SF-8 mental component score (MCS), all P<0.05]. Implanted LVAD patients had a better QOL than extracorporeal LVAD patients (n=33, 32.1±21.9 vs. n=17, 47.6±18.2), and Stage D HF patients (n=32, 51.1±17.3), but the score was comparable to that of patients who had undergone a heart transplant (n=13). In multiple regression analyses, postoperative lower albumin concentration and right ventricular failure were independently associated with poorer PCS. Female sex and postoperative anxiety were 2 of the independent factors for poorer MCS (all P<0.05)., Conclusions: Having an implantable LVAD improves patients' QOL, which is better than that of patients with an extracorporeal LVAD. Both clinical and psychological factors are influence QOL after LVAD implantation.

Background: Although cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) testing is an established tool for predicting survival in patients with heart failure (HF), its prognostic impact on explantation of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) was unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 33 patients who had undergone implantation of extracorporeal pulsatile flow LVAD and symptom-limited CPX testing at 3 months after operation, and who were followed between 2005 and 2014. Patients who received conversion to continuous flow LVAD were excluded. On Cox regression analysis, E1 (maximum load ≥51W; HR, 27.55), E2 (minute ventilation/carbon dioxide output [V̇E/V̇CO2] slope ≤34; HR, 16.86), and E3 (peak oxygen consumption [PV̇O2] ≥12.8 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1); HR, 18.35) significantly predicted explantation expectancy during 2 years after LVAD implantation (P<0.05 for all). Explantation score, the sum of positive E1-3, significantly stratified 2-year cumulative explantation rate into low (0 points), intermediate (1-2 points), and high (3 points) expectancy groups (0%, 29%, and 86%, respectively, P<0.001). When the scoring system was used for 45 patients with continuous flow LVAD, the 2 patients who had explantation were assigned to the high expectancy group., Conclusions: Explantation score, calculated simply from 3 postoperative symptom-limited CPX testing parameters, is a novel tool to predict explantation expectancy of LVAD and to select good candidates for the weaning test.

Background: Among variables obtained from cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPXT), peak oxygen consumption (PV̇O2) and the minute ventilation vs. carbon dioxide output (V̇E vs. V̇CO2) slope were established as predictors of death of patients with heart failure (HF) at the cutoff points of 14 ml·min(-1)·kg(-1)and 34, respectively. However, a recent update of guideline-directed medical treatment (GDMT) might alter the implication of these variables., Methods and Results: We enrolled 77 HF patients receiving GDMT who had undergone symptom-limited CPXT between 2006 and 2014. Among them, 29 patients were re-hospitalized for HF and there were 13 cardiac deaths during the 4-year study period. Cox regression analyses demonstrated that the V̇E vs. V̇CO2slope, peak heart rate, peak systolic blood pressure, and PV̇O2were significant predictors of both re-admission and cardiac death at each cutoff point calculated by receiver-operating characteristic analyses. A new scoring system was constructed using the following criteria: 1 point was assigned to a variable meeting the cutoff point for re-admission; 2 points were assigned to that for cardiac death. The total scores calculated as the summation of each point (range, 0-8 points) had significantly highest area under the curves compared with each CPXT variable (P<0.05), and significantly stratified both event-free rate into 3 groups (P<0.05)., Conclusions: A novel scoring system using 4 CPXT variables simultaneously predicted re-admission and cardiac death even in patients with HF receiving GDMT.

Background: We previously reported that cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) is not an appropriate rescue strategy in patients with advanced heart failure (HF), especially those dependent on inotrope infusion, and instead early ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation should be considered. Predictors of response to CRT in such populations, however, remain uncertain., Methods and results: We studied 67 inpatients aged <65 years old with advanced HF, who received CRT-D between 2007 and 2014. Eleven patients (16%) were responders, in whom LVEF improved >10% at 6-month follow up. On logistic regression analysis, LA volume index (LAVI) <43 ml/m(2)(odds ratio (OR), 36.67; P=0.001) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB; OR, 6.663; P=0.032) were significant predictors of response to CRT-D among the baseline variables. Patients with both predictors were associated with improvements in LVEF and plasma B-type natriuretic peptide compared with those with none of these predictors during the 6-month follow up period (P<0.05 for both). VAD-free survival rate was significantly higher in the responders compared with the non-responders during the 2-year study period (86% vs. 52%, P=0.044)., Conclusions: CLBBB and smaller LAVI are novel predictors of response in patients with advanced HF receiving CRT-D in real-world practice. Such responders may be better candidates for CRT-D and delay of cardiac replacement therapy.

Background: Although intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is sometimes used before cardiac surgery to achieve better outcome in high-risk patients, the clinical impact of prophylactic IABP support before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in patients with worsening hemodynamics was unknown., Methods and results: We enrolled 22 patients with worsening hemodynamics who had received IABP support before LVAD (IABP group), and also enrolled 22 patients receiving neither IABP nor extracorporeal membrane oxygenation before LVAD, who were selected on propensity score matching (non-IABP group). Although both groups had similar preoperative background, the IABP group had shorter postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and more improved hemodynamics (P<0.05 for all). Serum total bilirubin and creatinine decreased significantly in the IABP group compared with the non-IABP group during 1 month after LVAD implantation (P<0.05 for both). Medical expenses during perioperative ICU stay were significantly lower in the IABP group compared with the non-IABP group, even including the cost of preoperative IABP support (P<0.05)., Conclusions: Prophylactic IABP support in heart failure patients with worsening hemodynamics improves post-LVAD clinical course and reduces perioperative medical expenses.