1. Conformal gravity: light deflection revisited and the galactic rotation curve failure
- Author
-
M. C. Campigotto, Antonaldo Diaferio, and Lorenzo Fatibene
- Subjects
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO) ,Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous) ,General relativity ,Dark matter ,FOS: Physical sciences ,Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics ,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc) ,dark matter ,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology ,galaxy rotation curves ,Theoretical physics ,gravitation ,cosmology ,conformal gravity ,light deflection ,conservation laws ,astro-ph.CO ,Galaxy rotation curve ,Physics ,Conservation law ,Invariant (physics) ,Galaxy ,Conformal gravity ,Gravitational lens ,Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics - Abstract
We show how Conformal Gravity (CG) has to satisfy a fine-tuning condition to describe the rotation curves of disk galaxies without the aid of dark matter. Interpreting CG as a gauge natural theory yields conservation laws and their associated superpotentials without ambiguities. We consider the light deflection of a point-like lens and impose that the two Schwarzschild-like metrics with and without the lens are identical at infinite distances from the lens. The energy conservation law implies that the parameter $\gamma$ in the linear term of the metric has to vanish, otherwise the two metrics are physically inaccessible from each other. This linear term is responsible to mimic the role of dark matter in disk galaxies and gravitational lensing systems. Our analysis shows that removing the need of dark matter with CG thus relies on a fine-tuning condition on $\gamma$. We also illustrate why the results of previous investigations of gravitational lensing in CG largely disagree. These discrepancies derive from the erroneous use of the deflection angle definition adopted in General Relativity, where the vacuum solution is asymptotically flat, unlike CG. In addition, the lens mass is identified with various combinations of the metric parameters. However, these identifications are arbitrary, because the mass is not a conformally invariant quantity, unlike the conserved charge associated to the energy conservation law. Based on this conservation law and by removing the fine-tuning condition on $\gamma$, i.e. by setting $\gamma=0$, the energy difference between the metric with the point-like lens and the metric without it defines a conformally invariant quantity that can in principle be used for (1) a proper derivation of light deflection in CG, and (2) the identification of the lens mass with a function of the parameters $\beta$ and $k$ of the Schwarzschild-like metric., Comment: 16 pages, 1 figure. Revised version according to the referees comments. The results reported in the original version remain unchanged
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF