Search

International studies report marked increases in the prevalence of food allergy, along with increases in hospital admissions and emergency presentations for severe allergic reactions due to foods. The prevalence of self-reported food allergy is common, but generally exceeds that which can be verified from challenge studies, although nut allergies appear to be an important exception to this rule. Studies examining food allergy deaths suggest that those who die of food allergy usually have co-existent asthma. Adolescents and young adults are at most risk, and adrenaline auto-injectors are sub-optimally used. Food chemical sensitivity is very commonly reported but not usually verified by challenge testing. However, the exception to this is sulphite sensitivity, which can elicit reproducible reactions in some. The increasing prevalence of severe food allergies and awareness of its risk in those with asthma demands an especially rigorous approach to the diagnosis and management of co-existent food allergy and asthma, especially in young people who appear to be at most risk from death from severe food allergy. Cite this as: A. Gillman and Jo A. Douglass, Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2010 (40) 1295–1302. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Three patients were skin test positive to only goat and sheep milk and four to at least one other milk product from buffalo mozzarella, cow's milk or camel milk. We identified seven adults with new-onset IgE-mediated allergy to orally ingested goat milk products Patients used goat milk skincare products prior to developing allergy, and six had atopic dermatitis Competitive inhibition experiments suggested the skincare products led to transcutaneous sensitization and goat milk allergy To the Editor, Milk allergy is one of the most common food allergies in children, but usually resolves in the first years of life.1 Adult-onset milk allergy is rare. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Experimental challenge studies have shown that pollen can have early and delayed effects on the lungs and airways. Here, we qualitatively and quantitatively synthesize the evidence of outdoor pollen exposure on various lung function and airway inflammation markers in community‐based studies. Methods: Four online databases were searched: Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL and Google Scholar. The search strategy included terms relating to both exposure and outcomes. Inclusion criteria were human‐based studies published in English that were representative of the community. Additionally, we only considered cross‐sectional or short‐term longitudinal studies which investigated pollen exposure by levels or season. Study quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle‐Ottawa scale. Meta‐analysis was conducted using random‐effects models. Results: We included 27 of 6551 studies identified from the search. Qualitative synthesis indicated associations between pollen exposure and predominantly type‐2 inflammation in both the upper and lower airways, but little evidence for lung function changes. People with ever asthma and/or seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) were at higher risk of such airway inflammation. Meta‐analysis confirmed a positive relationship between pollen season, eosinophilia and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in people with ever SAR but the results between studies were highly variable. Heterogeneity was reduced after further subgrouping by age, and the forest plots indicated that eosinophilic airway inflammation to outdoor pollen exposure increased with age. Conclusion: Among people with ever asthma and ever SAR, exposure to increased ambient pollen triggers type‐2 upper and lower airway inflammation rather than a non‐specific or innate inflammation. These findings can lead to the formulation of specific pollen immunotherapy for susceptible individuals. Future research should be directed towards investigating lagged associations and effect modifications using larger and more generalized populations. Systematic review registration: CRD42020146981 (PROSPERO). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]