Search

A qualitative study conducted in Egypt, Sri Lanka, Barbados, and Trinidad and Tobago found that these countries lack equitable drug allergy management pathways. The study suggests that computerized decision support systems, along with basic training and education, could improve accurate labeling and de-labeling of drug allergies. The participants expressed concerns about the lack of standardized policies and guidelines for managing drug allergies, as well as a lack of clarity among healthcare professionals regarding the distinction between drug allergies and other adverse drug reactions. The study also highlights the need for more allergy specialists and resources in these countries. [Extracted from the article]

Keywords: anaphylaxis; angioedema; clinical immunology; drug allergy; IgE EN anaphylaxis angioedema clinical immunology drug allergy IgE 781 784 4 07/05/23 20230701 NES 230701 Key messages The prevalence of unverified drug allergy labels (DALs) was 5.6%. In all, seven (6.37%) patients reported an allergy but could not recall the names of the drugs and five patients reported an allergy to anti-TB drugs and could not recall the name of the implicated drug. The most common drug classes implicated were antibiotics - 59 (53.15%), followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) - 20 (18.01%), radio-contrast medium - 12 (10.8%) and antihistamines - 6 (5.40%). [Extracted from the article]

Epidemiological studies have shown a rise in the prevalence of allergic diseases in India during the last two decades. However, recent evidence from the Global Asthma Network study has observed a decrease in allergic rhinitis, asthma and atopic dermatitis in children. Still, with a population over 1.3 billion, there is a huge burden of allergic rhinitis, asthma and atopic dermatitis, and this is compounded by an unmet demand for trained allergy specialists and poor health service framework. There is wide variation in the prevalence of allergic diseases between different geographical locations in India, and the reasons are unclear at present. This may at least in part be attributable to considerable heterogeneity in aero‐biology, weather, air pollution levels, cultural and religious factors, diet, socioeconomic strata and literacy. At present, factors enhancing risks and those protecting from development of atopy and allergic diseases have not been well delineated, although there is some evidence for the influence of genetic factors alongside cultural and environmental variables such as diet, exposure to tobacco smoke and air pollution and residence in urban areas. This narrative review provides an overview of data from India regarding epidemiology, risk factors and genetics and highlights gaps in evidence as well as areas for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A wide range of topics have been covered by leading experts from India including indoor and outdoor allergens, allergic airways disease, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) and food allergy. India has recently overtaken China as the most populous country in the globe with an estimated total population of ~1.43 billion people, comprising approximately 20% of the globe. REFERENCES 1 Laha A, Moitra S, Podder S. A review on aero-allergen induced allergy in India. [Extracted from the article]

The Standards of Care Committee of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) and a committee of experts and key stakeholders have developed this guideline for the evaluation and testing of patients with an unsubstantiated label of penicillin allergy. The guideline is intended for UK clinicians who are not trained in allergy or immunology, but who wish to develop a penicillin allergy de‐labelling service for their patients. It is intended to supplement the BSACI 2015 guideline "Management of allergy to penicillin and other beta‐lactams" and therefore does not detail the epidemiology or aetiology of penicillin allergy, as this is covered extensively in the 2015 guideline (1). The guideline is intended for use only in patients with a label of penicillin allergy and does not apply to other beta‐lactam allergies. The recommendations include a checklist to identify patients at low risk of allergy and a framework for the conduct of drug provocation testing by non‐allergists. There are separate sections for adults and paediatrics within the guideline, in recognition of the common differences in reported allergy history and likelihood of true allergy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pollen food syndrome (PFS) is a highly prevalent food allergy affecting pollen‐sensitized children and adults. Sufferers experience allergic symptoms when consuming raw plant foods, due to the homology between the pollen allergens and unstable proteins in these foods. The triggers involved can vary depending on the pollen sensitization, which in turn is affected by geographical location. The British Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) Standards of Care Committee (SOCC) identified a need to develop a guideline for the diagnosis and management of PFS in the United Kingdom (UK). Guidelines produced by the BSACI use either the GRADE or SIGN methodology; due to a lack of high‐quality evidence these recommendations were formulated using the SIGN guidelines, which is acknowledged to be less robust than the GRADE approach. The correct diagnosis of PFS ensures the avoidance of a misdiagnosis of a primary peanut or tree nut allergy or confusion with another plant food allergy to non‐specific lipid transfer proteins. The characteristic foods involved, and rapid‐onset oropharyngeal symptoms, mean PFS can often be diagnosed from the clinical history alone. However, reactions involving tree nuts, peanuts and soya milk or severe/atypical reactions to fruits and vegetables may require additional diagnostic tests. Management is through the exclusion of known trigger foods, which may appear to be simple, but is highly problematic if coupled with a pre‐existing food allergy or for individuals following a vegetarian/vegan diet. Immunotherapy to pollens is not an effective treatment for PFS, and although oral or sublingual immunotherapy to foods seems more promising, large, controlled studies are needed. The typically mild symptoms of PFS can lead to an erroneous perception that this condition is always easily managed, but severe reactions can occur, and anxiety about the onset of symptoms to new foods can have a profound effect on quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AFS in our study was characterized by earlier age of onset, higher IgE levels and lower FEV1 We suggest AFS is worth considering in uncontrolled asthma and those with moderate-severe asthma There is a need to assess anti-fungal drugs as an adjunct to standard therapy in AFS To the editor, The biological role of fungi in the pathophysiology of asthma has attracted renewed attention during the last decade. Assessment of sensitization to aero-allergens including fungal allergens was performed by the skin prick tests using allergen kits by Hollister Stier Allergy (Jubilant Pharma LLC, USA). Patients with multiple fungal sensitizations had poorer ACT scores in comparison to those with sensitization to a single fungal allergen ( I p i < 0.001), that is the median ACT scores in subjects with no fungal allergen was 23.0 (22.0-24.0); with sensitization to one fungal allergen was 21.0 (19.0-22.0) and with sensitization to >=2 fungal allergens was 18.0 (18.0-20.0) (Figure 1C). (C) Box plot illustrating the relationship between ACT scores and sensitization to none, 1 or >=2 fungal allergens: The plot illustrates that sensitization to >=2 fungal allergens was associated with poorer asthma control. [Extracted from the article]

Keywords: asthma; atopic dermatitis; autoimmunity; epidemiology; ethnicity; rheumatoid; rhinitis; SLE; vitiligo EN asthma atopic dermatitis autoimmunity epidemiology ethnicity rheumatoid rhinitis SLE vitiligo 144 147 4 01/05/21 20210101 NES 210101 To the Editor, The burden of allergic diseases (ADs) such as asthma and rhinitis and autoimmune disorders (AIDs) such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is relatively low/moderate in low- and low-middle-income countries,1,2 and there is some evidence regarding higher incidence rates of these conditions amongst immigrant population settled in high-income countries.3,4 The burden of ADs is particularly high in high-income countries such as the UK, Republic of Ireland and New Zealand.1 Studies in immigrants have been limited by several factors including relatively small sample size, shorter duration and methodological issues such as selection bias, survey- or questionnaire-based data, focus on a single or limited number of ADs or AIDs, and some not accounting for important disease confounders such as smoking history. Specifically, the risk of AE, ARC, SLE, ATD and vitiligo is uniformly higher amongst British ethnic minority groups in comparison with the White population. Asthma, atopic dermatitis, autoimmunity, epidemiology, ethnicity, rheumatoid, rhinitis, SLE, vitiligo. [Extracted from the article]