Search

Objectives: To evaluate leflunomide as an adjuvant drug in refractory dermatomyositis (DM) with primarily cutaneous activity., Methods: A retrospective, single-centre, cohort study including 18 adult patients with DM (classical or clinically amyopathic DM) and cutaneous activity from 2001 to 2016 was conducted. Patients were dependent on glucocorticoid and refractory to at least two full-dose immunosuppressants/immunomodulators or presented previous adverse events with immunobiological drugs. One immunosuppressant was maintained and leflunomide added to the treatment. Patients were followed for six consecutive months., Results: Leflunomide proved effective and safe in 12 (66.6%) out of the 18 patients. There was total control of cutaneous activity and prednisone was tapered from 17.5 to 6.0 mg/day (p<0.001). In addition, two of these patients that also had muscle involvement improved muscle strength after leflunomide treatment. Side effects or inefficacy were observed in six patients. There were no cases of serious infection or death., Conclusions: Leflunomide therapy appears to be effective and safe as an adjuvant drug in refractory DM with primarily cutaneous activity. Further studies are needed to confirm this data.

Objectives: Prompted by the few studies available in the literature, we analysed patients with necrotising myopathy associated with anti-signal recognition particle (anti-SRP)., Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-centre cohort study involving 14 patients with anti-SRP antibody followed between 2001 and 2016., Results: Patients had a mean age at disease onset of 40.7 years and were predominantly female and of white ethnicity. At disease onset, all patients had limb muscle weakness with median serum of creatine phosphokinase level of 8080U/L, 64.3% had constitutional symptoms, 50% dysphagia, 42.9% myalgia, 21.4% and 14.3% pulmonary and articular involvement, respectively. There were no cases of cutaneous, neurological or cardiac involvements. Notably, 21.4% of patients had previous exposure to statins. Moreover, with the exception of one patient, all received methylprednisolone pulse therapy and/or human intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), as well as prednisone and different immunosuppressive drugs or rituximab. Relapse occurred in 64.3% of the cases. However, most patients had significant recovery of muscle strength, with half no longer using glucocorticoids and the remainder on a weaning regimen with low dose prednisone., Conclusions: Unlike the cases described in the literature, there was a high frequency of extra-muscular symptoms in the patients studied. Moreover, one fifth of patients had previous exposure to statin use. There was a high relapse rates, but with good clinical and laboratory recovery, especially with pulse therapy regimen of methylprednisolone and/or IVIg.