Search

Background: Beta-2 adrenergic receptor (ß2AR) modulates immune activation and may enhance trastuzumab activity. We assessed the impact of ß2AR gene (ADRB2) expression on the outcomes of patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer enrolled on the NCCTG-N9831 trial., Patients and Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of the NCCTG-N9831 trial, which compared chemotherapy (arm A) versus chemotherapy plus trastuzumab (arms B&C) as adjuvant treatment of patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer, with disease-free survival (DFS) as primary endpoint. Gene expression levels retrieved by DASL assay were used to classify patients as ADRB2-high or ADRB2-low. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by a Cox proportional model adjusted for prognostic variables and ADRB2 expression. Correlations between ADRB2 expression and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels were assessed with Pearson coefficient. A multivariable Cox regression model with interaction term was performed to assess the interaction between ADRB2 expression and treatment arm; and ADRB2 expression and a 8-gene signature previously shown to predict trastuzumab benefit., Results: Overall, 1,282 patients were included (ADRB2-high [N = 944] / ADRB2-low [N = 338]). A high expression of ADRB2 was associated with a longer DFS (P = .01) in the overall population. The addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy improved DFS only in patients with ADRB2-high tumors (P < .01). ADRB2 expression was correlated with TIL levels (r = 0.24, P < .001). No association between ADRB2 expression and the 8-gene trastuzumab benefit signature was observed (P = .32)., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a high ADRB2 expression is a favorable prognostic factor and may identify patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer who benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT00005970., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The APHINITY (BIG 4-11) study showed that pertuzumab significantly improved the rates of invasive disease-free survival among patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, operable breast cancer when added to adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy. Because diarrhea was a common adverse event that could compromise treatment administration, we evaluated the incidence and management of diarrhea in the APHINITY study., Patients and Methods: The APHINITY trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive standard adjuvant chemotherapy and 1 year of trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab or placebo. The diarrhea incidence, severity (National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events, version 4.0), onset, and management were analyzed., Results: A total of 4805 patients were randomized. Diarrhea of any grade was the most common adverse event and occurred in 71% of patients in the pertuzumab arm versus 45% in the placebo arm. Diarrhea grade 3 to 4 was observed in 10% and 4% in the pertuzumab and placebo arms, respectively. The greatest incidence of diarrhea was reported during the concomitant administration of HER2-targeted therapy and taxane (61% vs. 34% of patients experienced an event with pertuzumab vs. placebo, respectively). A marked decrease was observed on chemotherapy cessation. Antidiarrheal agents were commonly used, and diarrhea rarely caused treatment dose modifications or discontinuation., Conclusion: Diarrhea was a common adverse event in the APHINITY study. Most episodes were low grade and were generally manageable with common antidiarrheal agents. The incidence of diarrhea was greater with the combination of a taxane and HER2-targeted treatment and decreased once chemotherapy was stopped., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR(+)) breast cancer in whom disease progresses or there is recurrence while taking a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) are usually treated with exemestane (EXE), but no single standard of care exists in this setting. The BOLERO-2 trial demonstrated that adding everolimus (EVE) to EXE improved progression-free survival (PFS) while maintaining quality of life when compared with EXE alone. Because many women with HR(+) advanced breast cancer are elderly, the tolerability profile of EVE plus EXE in this population is of interest., Patients and Methods: BOLERO-2, a phase III randomized trial, compared EVE (10 mg/d) and placebo (PBO), both plus EXE (25 mg/d), in 724 postmenopausal women with HR(+) advanced breast cancer recurring/progressing after treatment with NSAIs. Safety and efficacy data in elderly patients are reported at 18-month median follow-up., Results: Baseline disease characteristics and treatment histories among the elderly subsets (≥ 65 years, n = 275; ≥ 70 years, n = 164) were generally comparable with younger patients. The addition of EVE to EXE improved PFS regardless of age (hazard ratio, 0.59 [≥ 65 years] and 0.45 [≥ 70 years]). Adverse events (AEs) of special interest (all grades) that occurred more frequently with EVE than with PBO included stomatitis, infections, rash, pneumonitis, and hyperglycemia. Elderly EVE-treated patients had similar incidences of these AEs as did younger patients but had more on-treatment deaths., Conclusion: Adding EVE to EXE offers substantially improved PFS over EXE and was generally well tolerated in elderly patients with HR(+) advanced breast cancer. Careful monitoring and appropriate dose reductions or interruptions for AE management are recommended during treatment with EVE in this patient population., (Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Growth and proliferation responses mediated by the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases (TKs) are often dysregulated in breast cancer, resulting in an aggressive course of disease and, historically, a poorer prognosis. The inhibition of ErbB-mediated signaling using recently developed monoclonal antibodies and small-molecule TK inhibitors has resulted in significant clinical benefit for patients with this tumor phenotype in the metastatic and adjuvant settings. However, many ErbB2-positive cancers exhibit intrinsic resistance, and the widespread development of acquired resistance to ErbB-targeted agents remains a substantial clinical problem. There are many potential mechanisms for resistance to this type of therapy, including the formation of alternative ErbB signaling complexes and crosstalk with other pathways. The simultaneous inhibition of multiple ErbB receptors and/or components of other signal cascades could therefore provide new strategies to circumvent the resistance mechanisms that often accompany ErbB-targeted approaches. In addition, regimens using combinations of targeted agents or those that incorporate existing cytotoxic drugs are continually being tested for their ability to improve responses and treat patients who have become refractory to previous therapies. Large, international collaborative efforts at designing and conducting studies to optimize treatment options for patients with ErbB2-positive breast cancer are ongoing, and careful review of data from these trials will improve tailoring of these modern therapeutic strategies.

Breast cancer treatment guidelines are not uniformly followed in clinical practice, with evidence for substantial variations in treatment patterns, quality of care, and patient outcomes among and within countries. The factors that drive treatment decisions are unclear. Furthermore, the impact of different treatment strategies on survival is poorly understood outside the clinical trial setting. Sources of patterns of care information often have limitations in completeness, quality, timeliness of reporting, and relevance to the larger population. Patterns of care studies frequently lack details on cancer stage at diagnosis, tumor biology, and treatment received. It is difficult to compare data between studies and/or track changes over time because of variations in data sources and collection techniques. Thus, the design and implementation of a global registry is sorely needed in order to prospectively evaluate worldwide patterns of care and outcomes in patients with breast cancer. Components of this registry should include random selection of centers of variable practice settings in multiple countries and accurate and rapid data reporting at prestudy and follow-up timepoints. Data collected would include tumor and demographic factors, staging information, treatment rendered, and survival. Variables that influenced the treatment selected would be assessed. This unique international effort would allow the development of strategies to improve diagnostic and treatment-related standards of care and survival outcomes, thus reducing the breast cancer burden worldwide.

The elderly population has been neglected by the traditional approach to clinical breast cancer research. Elderly women have been underrepresented in breast cancer clinical trials, with the majority of studies being restricted to patients aged < 70 years. Elderly patients frequently have comorbidities and/or impaired organ function. These facts may often lead to death from causes other than cancer, thus nullifying any possible benefit of adjuvant treatment; furthermore, they render extrapolation of standard treatment recommendations to the elderly potentially hazardous, particularly with respect to chemotherapy. Therefore, specific clinical trials are needed to investigate adjuvant treatments tailored for the heterogeneous older population.

One of the current trends in breast cancer research is to identify markers that can predict response to specific anticancer therapies; intense laboratory research and therapeutic trials are exploiting this strategy. The combination of cytotoxic drugs directed at the tumor population with the highest probability of being sensitive to them with molecules targeted at intracellular signaling and cell cycle control pathways, which may be deregulated as part of the malignant process, represents our best hope for improved survival in both early and advanced disease. The transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor, HER2/neu, has been the subject of much investigation with respect to its prognostic value, predictive value, and as a target of antibody-mediated therapy. Retrospective evidence strongly suggests that HER2 overexpression is associated with decreased disease-free and overall survival in node-positive, and possibly also node-negative, breast cancer. Prospective trials have demonstrated that antibodies to HER2 can produce tumor responses in women with advanced disease that overexpresses this molecule. Moreover, the combination of such antibodies with cytotoxic drugs has been one of the few recent strategies to improve survival duration in metastatic breast cancer. The evidence supporting the role of HER2 as a factor predictive of response to hormone therapy and cytotoxic drugs is more ambiguous and requires prospective assessment. The available literature is reviewed herein, with a focus on the predictive value of HER2, potential mechanisms of resistance and sensitivity to various drugs, and future research directions involving this important molecule.

Because tamoxifen (TAM), a nonsteroidal antiestrogen, is routinely used in the adjuvant setting, other hormone therapies are needed as alternatives for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Currently, exemestane (EXE) and other antiaromatase agents are indicated for use in patients who experience failure of TAM. In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, TAM-controlled (20 mg/day), phase II trial, we examined the activity and tolerability of EXE 25 mg/day for the first-line treatment of MBC in postmenopausal women. Exemestane was well tolerated and demonstrated substantial first-line antitumor activity based on intent-to-treat analysis of peer-reviewed responses. In the EXE arm, values for complete, partial, and objective response, clinical benefit, and time to tumor progression (TTP) exceeded those reported for TAM although no statistical comparison was made. Based on these encouraging results, a phase III trial will compare EXE and TAM.