1. Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis Detects FGFR2 Amplification and Concurrent Genomic Alterations Associated with FGFR Inhibitor Efficacy in Advanced Gastric Cancer
- Author
-
Hisateru Yasui, Naohiro Okano, Hideaki Bando, Tomoko Jogo, Takayuki Yoshino, Taroh Satoh, Satoshi Fujii, Yoshiaki Nakamura, Eiji Shinozaki, Takanobu Yamada, Akihito Tsuji, Hiroki Hara, Takashi Ohta, Yoshito Komatsu, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Eiji Oki, Takeshi Kawakami, Hiroya Taniguchi, Taito Esaki, Yu Sunakawa, Nobuhisa Matsuhashi, Tomohiro Nishina, Takeshi Kato, Koushiro Ohtsubo, Toshihiko Doi, Kohei Shitara, Justin I. Odegaard, and Tetsuji Terazawa
- Subjects
musculoskeletal diseases ,Cancer Research ,Poor prognosis ,Plasma samples ,business.industry ,FGFR Inhibition ,Advanced gastric cancer ,Oncology ,Fibroblast growth factor receptor ,Tumor progression ,Circulating tumor DNA ,embryonic structures ,Cancer research ,Medicine ,In patient ,business - Abstract
Purpose: FGFR2 amplification is associated with poor prognosis in advanced gastric cancer and its subclonal heterogeneity has been revealed. Here, we examined whether circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was useful for detecting FGFR2 amplification and co-occurring resistance mechanisms in advanced gastric cancer. Experimental Design: We assessed genomic characteristics of FGFR2-amplified advanced gastric cancer in a nationwide ctDNA screening study. We also analyzed FGFR2 amplification status in paired tissue and plasma samples with advanced gastric cancer. In addition, we examined patients with FGFR2-amplified advanced gastric cancer identified by ctDNA sequencing who received FGFR inhibitors. Results: FGFR2 amplification was more frequently detected by ctDNA sequencing in 28 (7.7%) of 365 patients with advanced gastric cancer than by tissue analysis alone (2.6%–4.4%). FGFR2 amplification profiling of paired tissue and plasma revealed that FGFR2 amplification was detectable only by ctDNA sequencing in 6 of 44 patients, which was associated with a worse prognosis. Two patients in whom FGFR2 amplification was detected by ctDNA sequencing after tumor progression following previous standard chemotherapies but not by pretreatment tissue analysis had tumor responses to FGFR inhibitors. A third patient with FGFR2 and MET co-amplification in ctDNA showed a limitation of benefit from FGFR inhibition, accompanied by a marked increase in the MET copy number. Conclusions: ctDNA sequencing identifies FGFR2 amplification missed by tissue testing in patients with advanced gastric cancer, and these patients may respond to FGFR inhibition. The utility of ctDNA sequencing warrants further evaluation to develop effective therapeutic strategies for patients with FGFR2-amplified advanced gastric cancer.
- Published
- 2021