Search

Brostallicin (PNU-166196) is a cytotoxic agent that binds to the minor groove of DNA with significant antitumor activity in preclinical studies. This trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the toxicity profile, and the pharmacokinetics of Brostallicin in cancer patients.Patients were treated with escalating doses of Brostallicin ranging from 0.85 to 15 mg/m(2) administered as a 10-min i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected during the first and second course, and analyzed by liquid-chromatography with tandem-mass spectrometric detection.Twenty-seven evaluable patients received a total of 73 courses. Grade 4 neutropenia was the only dose-limiting toxicity at 12.5 mg/m(2), whereas grade 4 thrombocytopenia (1 patient) and grade 4 neutropenia (2 patients) were the dose-limiting toxicities at 15 mg/m(2). Other side effects, including thrombocytopenia and nausea, were generally mild. The maximum tolerated dose was defined at 10 mg/m(2). The clearance and terminal half-life of Brostallicin were dose-independent, with mean (+/-SD) values of 9.33 +/- 2.38 liters/h/m(2) and 4.69 +/- 1.88 h, respectively. There was no significant accumulation of Brostallicin with repeated administration. Significant relationships were observed between systemic exposure to Brostallicin and neutrophil counts at nadir. One partial response was observed in a patient with a gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Brostallicin was found to be well tolerated, with neutropenia being the principal toxicity. The recommended dose for additional evaluation in this schedule is 10 mg/m(2).

The aim of this study was to investigate whether expression of particular drug resistance genes in primary operable breast cancer correlates with response to first-line chemotherapy in advanced disease.We determined mRNA levels of BCRP, LRP, MRP1, MRP2, and MDR1 in 59 primary breast tumor specimens of patients who received chemotherapy as first-line systemic treatment after diagnosis of advanced disease. The relative expression levels were measured by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR and subsequently analyzed in relation to the type of response to chemotherapy, the length of progression-free survival (PFS), and post-relapse overall survival.For each of these drug resistance genes, a large variation in expression level was observed among the tumors of the different patients. When analyzing mRNA expression in relation to overall response, it was found that the median expression level of these five drug resistance genes in the responding tumors, as compared with nonresponding tumors, was markedly lower. Classification of tumors as high versus low with respect to the expression level of these genes showed that the overall response in the MDR1-high subset (17%), as compared with the MDR1-low subset (68%), was significantly lower (P = 0.005). Although similar differences in response rate were found for subsets of tumors stratified by the expression level of the other drug resistance genes, none of the observed differences were statistically significant. However, in the subgroup of patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin/epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide), a correlation between response and the expression of BCRP and MRP1 (only PFS) was found, whereas such an association was not present in the cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil-treated group of patients. Furthermore, high expression of LRP as well as MDR1 was found to be significantly associated with a poor PFS (P = 0.04 and P0.001, respectively). For lung resistance-related protein, this association was limited to 5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin/epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide. Expression levels of BCRP, MRP1, or MRP2 were not related with the length of PFS. Furthermore, no correlation between the expression level of these drug resistance genes and post-relapse overall survival was found.In this pilot study, MDR1 expression in primary breast tumors was inversely related with the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy, and high expression level was a significant predictor of poor prognosis for patients with advanced disease. Apart from MDR1, the expression levels of BCRP, LRP, and MRP1 might have some additional predictive value for clinical outcome.

Repeated administrations of recombinant human interleukin-12 (rHuIL-12) to cancer patients are characterized by a reduction of side effects during treatment. Induction of IFN-gamma, considered a key mediator of antitumor effects of IL-12, is known to decline on repeated administrations. We studied whether other immunological effects of rHuIL-12 are tapered in the course of treatment.In a Phase I study of 26 patients with advanced renal cell cancer, rHuIL-12 was administered s.c. on day 1, followed by 7 days rest and six injections administered over a 2-week time period. Plasma concentrations of various cytokines were monitored, as well as absolute counts of circulating leukocyte and lymphocyte subsets.The first injection of IL-12 was accompanied by rapid, transient, and dose-dependent increments of plasma levels IFN-gamma, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, IL-10, IL-6, IL-8, but not IL-4, as well as rapid, transient, and dose-dependent reductions of lymphocyte, monocyte, and neutrophil counts. The major lymphocyte subsets, i.e., CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells, followed this pattern. On repeated rHuIL-12 injections, IL-10 concentrations increased further, whereas the transient increments of IFN-gamma, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, IL-6, and IL-8 concentrations, as well as the fluctuations of the leukocyte subset counts, were tapered. Dose escalation of IL-12 within clinically tolerable margins did not reduce the decline of these immunological effects.Induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and associated fluctuations in leukocyte subset counts decrease on repeated administrations of rHuIL-12. The steady increment of IL-10 plasma levels may mediate the observed down-regulation of clinical and immunological effects.

It has been hypothesized that the paclitaxel vehicle Cremophor EL (CrEL) is responsible for nonlinear drug disposition by micellar entrapment. To gain further insight into the role of CrEL in taxane pharmacology, we studied the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in the presence and absence of CrEL after i.p. and i.v. dosing. Patients received an i.p. tracer dose of [G-(3)H]paclitaxel in ethanol without CrEL (100 microCi diluted further in isotonic saline) on day 1, i.p. paclitaxel formulated in CrEL (Taxol; 125 mg/m(2)) on day 4, an i.v. tracer of [G-(3)H]paclitaxel on day 22, and i.v. Taxol (175 mg/m(2)) on day 24. Four patients (age range, 54-74 years) were studied, and serial plasma samples up to 72 h were obtained and analyzed for total radioactivity, paclitaxel, and CrEL. In the presence of CrEL, i.v. paclitaxel clearance was 10.2 +/- 3.76 liters/h/m(2) (mean +/- SD), consistent with previous findings. The terminal disposition half-life was substantially prolonged after i.p. dosing (17.0 +/- 11.3 versus 28.7 +/- 8.72 h), as was the mean residence time (7.28 +/- 2.76 versus 40.7 +/- 13.8 h). The bioavailability of paclitaxel was 31.4 +/- 5.18%, indicating insignificant systemic concentrations after i.p. treatment. CrEL levels were undetectable after i.p. dosing (0.05 microl/ml), whereas after i.v. dosing, the mean clearance was 159 +/- 58.4 ml/h/m(2), in line with earlier observations. In the absence of CrEL, the bioavailability and systemic concentrations of i.p. paclitaxel were significantly increased. This finding is consistent with the postulated concept that CrEL is largely responsible for the pharmacokinetic advantage for peritoneal cavity exposure to total paclitaxel compared with systemic delivery.

An additional chromatographic peak was observed in plasma samples of patients receiving NX 211, a liposomal formulation of the topoisomerase I inhibitor lurtotecan. We have isolated and purified this product by sequential solid-phase extractions, and we report its structure and cytotoxicity relative to lurtotecan and related agents. Nuclear magnetic resonance data indicate that cleavage of the piperazino moiety occurred at the N-C bond of the B-ring, yielding 7-methyl-10,11-ethylenedioxy-20(S)-camptothecin (MEC). Tests of the growth inhibition potential of MEC in seven human tumor cell lines showed that the compound was approximately 2-18-fold more cytotoxic than lurtotecan, topotecan, and 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-20(S)-camptothecin (SN-38). Subsequently, we found that MEC was the product of rapid photolysis of lurtotecan, with the rate of degradation inversely proportional to NX 211 concentrations, and greatly depends on light intensity. Furthermore, MEC concentrations were found to increase significantly in plasma samples exposed to laboratory light but not in blood. MEC was not produced from NX 211 in the presence of human liver microsomes, suggesting that it is not a product of cytochrome P-450 metabolism. Using a validated analytical method, trace levels of MEC were quantitated in blood samples of two patients. These observations confirm that the precautions for protection from light currently specified for preparation and administration of NX 211 dose solutions are critical. Procedures to minimize formation of MEC, by the use of amber vials for NX 211 and by preparation of dilutions immediately before clinical use in a fashion completely protected from light, are now being routinely implemented.