Search

Rodriguez-Revenga L, Badenas C, Sánchez A, Mallolas J, Carrió A, Pedrinaci S, Barrionuevo JL, Milà M. Cryptic chromosomal rearrangement screening in 30 patients with mental retardation and dysmorphic features. Mental retardation affects 1–3% of the general population, and the genetic causes in many cases are unknown. Cytogenetically undetected chromosomal imbalances have been indicated as an explanation. Nowadays, due to the development of molecular cytogenetic techniques, it is possible to identify cryptic rearrangements involving the ends of chromosomes. We report a screening using chromosome-specific telomere fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) probes, in a group of 30 patients with a well-characterized phenotype including mental retardation, dysmorphic features, and a normal karyotype. Among them, two subtelomeric rearrangements have been detected and characterized. One of them is a de novo deletion of 1p36, which has been previously described as a new contiguous gene syndrome. The second is an unbalanced product of a cryptic translocation involving chromosomes 1 and 13, which results in a partial 1q trisomy and partial 13q monosomy. These findings highlight, the importance of searching for cryptic subtelomeric rearrangements in non-syndromic mentally retarded patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has now replaced karyotyping in the analysis of prenatal cases with a fetal structural anomaly, whereas in those pregnancies undergoing invasive prenatal diagnosis with a normal fetal ultrasound, conventional karyotyping is still performed. The aims of this study were to establish the diagnostic yield of CMA in prenatal diagnosis, and to provide new data that might contribute to reconsider current practices. We reviewed 2905 prenatal samples with a normal rapid aneuploidy detection test referred for evaluation by CMA testing. Our study revealed pathogenic and reported susceptibility copy number variants associated with syndromic disorders in 4.8% (n = 138/2905) of cases, being 2.8% (n = 81/2905) the estimated added diagnostic value of CMA over karyotyping. Clinically significant CMA abnormality was detected in 5.4% (107/1975) of the fetuses with ultrasound anomalies and in 1.4% (5/345) of those considered as low-risk pregnancies. Our series shows that in prenatal samples, CMA increases 2-fold the diagnostic yield achieved by conventional karyotyping., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S . Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)