Search

The objective of this study was to estimate the lifetime risk of breast cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation with and without at least 1 first‐degree relative with breast cancer. A total of 2835 women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were followed. Age‐ and gene‐specific breast cancer rates were calculated. The relative risks of breast cancer for subjects with a family history of breast cancer, compared to no family history were calculated. The mean age at baseline was 41.1 years, and they were followed for a mean of 6.0 years. The estimated penetrance of breast cancer to age 80 years was 60.8% for BRCA1 and 63.1% for BRCA2. For all BRCA carriers, the penetrance of breast cancer to age 80 for those with no first‐degree relative with breast cancer was 60.4% and 63.3% for those with at least 1 first‐degree relative with breast cancer. The risk of breast cancer for BRCA carriers with no first‐degree relative with breast cancer is substantial, and as a result, clinical management for these women should be the same as those for women with an affected relative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Raskin L, Schwenter F, Freytsis M, Tischkowitz M, Wong N, Chong G, Narod SA, Levine DA, Bogomolniy F, Aronson M, Thibodeau SN, Hunt KS, Rennert G, Gallinger S, Gruber SB, Foulkes WD. Characterization of two Ashkenazi Jewish founder mutations in MSH6 gene causing Lynch syndrome. Founder mutations are an important cause of Lynch syndrome and facilitate genetic testing in specific ethnic populations. Two putative founder mutations in MSH6 were analyzed in 2685 colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, 337 endometrial cancer (EnCa) cases and 3310 healthy controls of Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) descent from population-based and hospital-based case-control studies in Israel, Canada and the United States. The carriers were haplotyped and the age of the mutations was estimated. MSH6*c.3984_3987dupGTCA was found in 8/2685 CRC cases, 2/337 EnCa cases, and 1/3310 controls, consistent with a high risk of CRC (odds ratio (OR) = 9.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-78.9, p = 0.0079) and a very high risk of EnCa (OR = 19.6, 95%CI = 1.8-217.2, p = 0.0006). MSH6*c.3959_3962delCAAG was identified in 3/2685 CRC cases, 2/337 EnCa cases and no controls. Each mutation was observed on separate conserved haplotypes. MSH6*c.3984_3987dupGTCA and MSH6*c.3959_3962delCAAG probably arose around 585 CE and 685 CE, respectively. No carriers were identified in Sephardi Jews (450 cases and 490 controls). Truncating mutations MSH6*c.3984_3987dupGTCA and MSH6*c.3959_3962delCAAG cause Lynch syndrome and are founder mutations in Ashkenazi Jews. Together with other AJ founder mutations, they contribute substantially to the incidence of CRC and EnCa and are important tools for the early diagnosis and appropriate management of AJ Lynch syndrome patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to estimate the lifetime risk of breast cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation with and without at least 1 first-degree relative with breast cancer. A total of 2835 women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were followed. Age- and gene-specific breast cancer rates were calculated. The relative risks of breast cancer for subjects with a family history of breast cancer, compared to no family history were calculated. The mean age at baseline was 41.1 years, and they were followed for a mean of 6.0 years. The estimated penetrance of breast cancer to age 80 years was 60.8% for BRCA1 and 63.1% for BRCA2. For all BRCA carriers, the penetrance of breast cancer to age 80 for those with no first-degree relative with breast cancer was 60.4% and 63.3% for those with at least 1 first-degree relative with breast cancer. The risk of breast cancer for BRCA carriers with no first-degree relative with breast cancer is substantial, and as a result, clinical management for these women should be the same as those for women with an affected relative., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of a regional population-based genetic testing program on the incidence of ovarian cancer in West Pomerania. Between 1999 and 2010, a total of 37,552 women ages 35 to 70 were tested for three BRCA1 founder mutations at the outpatient genetics clinic of the Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Poland. A total of 641 women were found to carry a mutation (1.7%) and of these, 220 had a prophylactic oophorectomy (34.3%). A total of 12 women had an occult cancer diagnosed at the time of prophylactic oophorectomy (5.5%). We estimate that 26 more ovarian cancers would have been diagnosed by January 2015 in the absence of these oophorectomies and that an additional 25 cancers will be prevented in the future (total 51). During this period, 1611 ovarian cancers were diagnosed in the region; therefore we estimate that approximately 1.6% of ovarian cancers were prevented between 1999 and 2015 by our genetic testing program. We conclude that the prophylactic oophorectomies performed between 1999 and 2010 as a result of widespread BRCA1 mutation testing have reduced the incidence of ovarian cancer in Pomerania by a small amount (about 1.6%), and that the impact of genetic testing will increase in the coming years., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Several studies have reported that women with ovarian cancer and a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations have better survival than women with ovarian cancer and no mutation. Potential reasons for this include possible differences in histologic subtype, stage, grade and response to chemotherapy, but some of the difference in survival may be due to systematic bias, i.e. a difference in survival rates for women who do and who do not undergo genetic testing. We estimated the survival rate in 1423 ovarian cancer patients from Ontario who had genetic testing and compared this with the survival rate for all 3367 ovarian cancer patients from the province from whom the tested sample was derived. Tested women had a 10-year survival of 54.5%, compared to 35.8% for all patients in the province. We evaluated the extent to which three different methods of adjustment eliminated the observed difference. The adjusted rates for the tested cohort were closer to the provincial average, but each adjustment method resulted in a modest over-estimate of 10-year survival, ranging from 6.1% to 10.0%. The mortality advantage for tested women was due, in part, to a lower than expected mortality rate of tested women in the period following genetic testing., (© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.)

Incidence rates of breast cancer among women with a BRCA1 mutation vary according to their reproductive histories and country of residence. To measure cancer incidence, it is best to follow-up cohort of healthy women prospectively. We followed up a cohort of 675 women with a BRCA1 mutation who did not have breast or ovarian cancer before inclusion and who had a normal clinical examination and mammography at first visit. After a mean of 7.1 years, 98 incident cases of breast cancer were recorded in the cohort. Annual cancer incidence rates were calculated, and based on these, a penetrance curve was constructed. The average annual cancer risk for the Norwegian women from age 25 to 70 was 2.0%. Founder mutations had lower incidence rate (1.7%) than less frequent mutations (2.5%) (p = 0.03). The peak incidence (3.1% annual risk) was observed in women from age 50 to 59. The age-specific annual incidence rates and penetrance estimate were compared with published figures for women from North America and from Poland. The risk of breast cancer to age 70 was estimated to be 61% for women from Norway, compared with 55% for women from Poland and 69% for women from North America., (© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

The contribution of mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to the burden of breast cancer in Costa Rica has not been studied. We estimated the frequency of BRCA mutations among 111 Costa Rican women with breast cancer and a family history of breast cancer. These women were mainly from the metropolitan area of San José. A detailed family history was obtained from each patient and a blood sample was processed for DNA extraction. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were sought using a combination of techniques and all mutations were confirmed by direct sequencing. Four different mutations were identified in five patients (four in BRCA2 and one in BRCA1) representing 4.5% of the total. Two unrelated patients were found to have a BRCA2 5531delTT mutation. Other BRCA2 mutations included C5507G and 6174delT. Only one BRCA1 mutation was found (C3522T). The family with the BRCA1 mutation had five cases of gastric cancer. Families with BRCA2 mutations were also reported to have cases of gastric and prostate cancers; however, the full range of cancers associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Costa Rica has not yet been established., (© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.)

Mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes account for approximately 80% of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families, but the size of these two genes makes mutation analysis time-consuming and technically challenging. In some populations such as the Ashkenazi Jewish and the French-Canadian, a small number of recurrent founder mutations account for the majority of mutations in cancer families. We have therefore developed two rapid genetic screening tests, which allow us to detect three frequent frameshift mutations in the Ashkenazi Jewish population and five frameshift mutations in the French-Canadian population. These fluorescent non-radioactive methods permit the simultaneous detection of multiple mutations by generating multiplexed PCR-amplified gene fragments, and by discriminating these on the basis of their size in a denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Using these methods, we were able to correctly identify all mutants in a blinded analysis of 276 DNA samples, including 30 derived from paraffin-embedded tumor samples and 10 from buccal-cell brushes, with no false positive or false negative results. These techniques designed for the direct detection of recurrent mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, have the advantages of being efficient, sensitive, cost-effective, and are applicable to large scale screening for epidemiologic studies.

Currently many centers offer testing for three specific mutations, 185delAG, 5382insC, and 6174delT, in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to Ashkenazi Jewish individuals at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer. We recently tested members of a family with multiple cases of breast and ovarian cancer (Family R014). The proband in this family tested positive for the 185delAG mutation. The unaffected sister of the proband tested positive for both the 185delAG and the 6174delT mutations. Further testing and review of the family history suggest that both mutations may have come from a maternal grandfather and passed down for two generations. Counseling of the unaffected double heterozygote individual in this family is complicated by lack of information on the risk of breast, ovarian, and other cancers in such individuals. A better understanding of these risks will depend on the identification and study of more individuals carrying mutations in both the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Our study emphasizes the importance of testing Ashkenazi Jewish individuals from high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families for all three common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations identified in this ethnic group.

The breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, differ in their contribution to ovarian cancer. Recently, founder mutations in each of these genes were identified in Canadian breast cancer and breast ovarian cancer families of French ancestry. We have examined the prevalence of the founder mutations in a series of 113 French Canadian women with ovarian cancer unselected for family history. Germline mutations were found in eight of 99 invasive carcinomas and in none of the 14 tumors of borderline malignancy. Five cases carried the BRCA1 C4446T mutation and two cases carried the BRCA2 8765delAG mutation which are the most common mutations that have been described in French Canadian breast cancer and breast ovarian cancer families. All of these cases reported a family history of at least one first-degree relative with breast cancer, diagnosed below age 60 years, or with ovarian cancer. The identification of founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in ovarian cancer cases unselected for family history can facilitate carrier detection when the expected yield of a comprehensive screen may be low.

Several cancer genetics centres offer testing for specific BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations to Ashkenazi Jewish individuals with a family history of breast and ovarian cancers. Testing involves screening for three common mutations found in this population, namely BRCA1 185delAG, 5382insC and BRCA2 6174delT (Struewing et al., Nat Genet 1995: 11: 198-200; Roa et al., Nat Genet 1996: 14: 185-187; Oddoux et al., Nat Genet 1996: 14: 188-190). We have identified a large Ashkenazi Jewish kindred (W9170) with ten cases of breast cancer and four cases of ovarian carcinoma. Initially, mutation analysis for this family identified a BRCA1 185delAG mutation in the proband diagnosed with three separate primary cancers of the breast, ovary and colon. Another individual in this family diagnosed with two primary cancers of the ovary and breast, was identified as having a second mutation, BRCA1 5382insC. Subsequent work found that two sisters (cousins of the proband), both diagnosed with carcinoma of the breast, had a third mutation, BRCA2 6174delT. These three mutations have previously been found to be more common in the Ashkenazi Jewish population (References as above). The identification of all three mutations in one family, raised new implications for the manner in which testing and counselling should be offered. In our opinion, Ashkenazi Jewish individuals in breast-ovarian cancer families should be offered complete testing for the three common Ashkenazi Jewish mutations regardless of previous identification of one of these mutations in the family.

Hereditary diseases due to mutation at different gene loci may be indistinguishable phenotypically. In these situations genetic risk predictions using polymorphic markers may be hampered if an individual family is not sufficiently informative to permit it to be assigned to one or the other linkage group. To provide the most usefull estimates of risk, the probability of linkage to a particular chromosome region should be determined prior to calculating risk estimates using the marker system. The probability can be calculated directly using the lod score generated for the family. The individual carrier risk is then the average of the carrier risks determined for linkage to different genetic loci, weighted by the probability of linkage to each group. Several examples are provided.