1. Viscometer validation studies for routine and experimental hemorheological measurements
- Author
-
Peter Kenyeres, I. Juricskay, Kalman Toth, Katalin Biro, Andras Toth, Kinga Totsimon, Gabor Kesmarky, and David Kovacs
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Adult ,Male ,Materials science ,Adolescent ,Physiology ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Validation Studies as Topic ,Viscosity measurement ,03 medical and health sciences ,Viscosity ,Young Adult ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physiology (medical) ,Calibration ,Humans ,Reproducibility ,Significant difference ,Viscometer ,Hematology ,Blood Viscosity ,030104 developmental biology ,Hemorheology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Biomedical engineering - Abstract
BACKGROUND Viscosity measurement is challenging due to the internal properties of blood and the artifacts deriving from the various viscometer systems. OBJECTIVE We aimed to determine the pitfalls of a cone-plate viscometer (Brookfield DV-III Ultra LV) before starting measurements and compare it to our capillary type model (Hemorex Hevimet 40). Effects of sample storage and thermal calibration were assessed as well. METHODS AND RESULTS Intra-observer variability was studied by 10 replicate measurements of 7 blood samples, mean coefficients of variation were less than 5%. Instruments were compared by measuring 26 blood samples, an average difference of 7% in WBV and 10% in PV was observed. 9 blood samples were stored at 4°C, 22°C and 37°C up to 48 hours to study the effect of storage on viscosity values. WBV at 50 and 100 s-1 became significantly lower after 3 hours at 37°C (p
- Published
- 2018