Search

Introduction: A dose-determination study was conducted in untreated stage III non-small-cell lung cancer to assess continuous exposure to fractionated oral vinorelbine (NVBo), a radiosensitizer, during the radiotherapy period, either alone (first cohort) or in combination with cisplatin (second cohort)., Patients and Methods: Three patients with stage IIIAN2/IIIB were expected at each dose level, with 3 additional patients in case of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Concomitantly with a 60-Gy total dose of radiotherapy, NVBo was given from 60 mg up to 180 mg total dose per week split on days 1, 3, and 5. Once the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), defined as 2 DLTs in a dose level, was determined and the recommended dose of NVBo alone was established, the trial assessed its recommended dose in combination with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks., Results: In the first cohort, 26 patients were enrolled. MTD was 160 mg/wk; there were 3 cases of grade 3 esophagitis and 1 of grade 3 pneumonia as DLT out of 5 patients in this dose level. In the recommended dose level (150 mg/wk), only 1 of 6 patients experienced a DLT. In the second cohort, 11 patients received NVBo weekly doses from 130 mg to 150 mg with cisplatin. Only 2 patients received 150 mg/wk NVBo; the trial closed before MTD was determined. The confirmed response rates were 42% and 55% in the first and second cohort, respectively., Conclusion: The recommended dose of this fractionated NVBo scheme as single-agent therapy concomitantly with radiotherapy for 6 weeks is 50 mg on days 1, 3, and 5 (150 mg/wk); combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, the dose should be 140 to 150 mg/wk adapted on hematology. The response rate is promising., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The combination of oral vinorelbine plus cisplatin has been studied in numerous trials as first-line treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) regardless of histologic subtype. NAVoTrial 01 is the first study that explores this combination specifically in nonsquamous (NS) NSCLC by assessing the feasibility of this doublet (ratio 1:2) in an investigational approach. A reference arm with pemetrexed plus cisplatin was included. Maintenance therapy with single-agent therapy after 4 cycles of combination therapy was included in the study schedules because it reflected a trend in first-line treatment of NSCLC., Patients and Methods: Stage IIIB/IV untreated/relapsed patients with NS NSCLC received a 3-week cycle of pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 (arm A) or oral vinorelbine 80 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (first cycle 60 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 (arm B). After 4 cycles, patients without disease progression received single-agent maintenance treatment with pemetrexed or oral vinorelbine., Results: Overall, 153 patients were randomized (arm A/arm B: 51/102). Disease control rate (%) for arm A was 76.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 62.5-87.2) and for arm B it was 75.0 (95% CI, 65.3-83.1), Response rates for arm A were 31.4% (95% CI, 19.1-45.9) and for arm B were 24.0% (95% CI, 16.0-33.6). Median progression-free survival for arm A was 4.3 months (95% CI, 3.8-5.6) and for arm B it was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.6-4.7). Median survival for arm A was 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.0-16.4) and for arm B it was 10.2 months (95% CI, 7.8-11.9). Main grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia 18.3% (arm A) and 44.0% (arm B), whereas febrile neutropenia was reported in 2% of patients in each arm., Conclusion: Oral vinorelbine and cisplatin had an efficacy in line with that achieved with a standard treatment such as pemetrexed and cisplatin, coupled with an acceptable safety profile., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The majority of cancer-related deaths are attributed to lung carcinoma. Age increases this incidence, which is also likely associated with physiologic modifications that affect drug pharmacokinetics and metabolism. Therefore, knowledge of pharmacokinetics in elderly patients is one of the major factors in deciding whether or not to reduce the dose to prevent toxicity. This phase II study was aimed at evaluating the influence of age on oral vinorelbine pharmacokinetics in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Inclusion criteria were > 70 years of age; histologically or cytologically proven NSCLC; inoperable stage IIIB, IV, or delayed relapse of any stage becoming unresectable; Karnofsky performance status > 80%; and normal hematology and biochemistry. Blood-limited sampling at intervals of 1.5, 3, and 24 hours after dosing was performed during the first administration of oral vinorelbine at 60 mg/m2. Bayesian pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated through previously published nonlinear mixed-effect modeling (NONMEM), and compared with a reference population of 52 patients (age, 56 years 12) selected from vinorelbine pharmacokinetic database. There were 48 patients evaluable for pharmacokinetics out of the 52 elderly patients enrolled (age, 74 years 3). There was no difference between pharmacokinetic parameters, including the bioavailability factor evaluated by NONMEM, even without intravenous administration, and a similar interindividual variability (32%-33%) was observed between the 2 groups. Furthermore, no correlation between age (range, 31-82 years) and oral vinorelbine total clearance was observed in 100 patients pooled together. Therefore, no requirement for oral vinorelbine dose reduction was suggested from a pharmacokinetic standpoint.