Search

Introduction: The tumoral immune milieu plays a crucial role for the development of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and may influence individual prognosis. We analyzed the predictive role of immune cell infiltrates after curative lung cancer surgery., Materials and Methods: The tumoral immune-cell infiltrate from 174 patients with pN1 NSCLC and adjuvant chemotherapy was characterized using immunofluorescence staining. The density and distribution of specific immune cells in tumor center (TU), invasive front (IF) and normal tissue (NORM) were correlated with clinical parameters and survival data., Results: Tumor specific survival (TSS) of all patients was 69.9% at 5 years. The density of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) was higher in TU and IF than in NORM. High TIL density in TU (low vs. high: 62.0% vs. 86.7%; p = .011) and the presence of cytotoxic T-Lymphocytes (CTLs) in TU and IF were associated with improved TSS (positive vs. negative: 90.6% vs. 64.7% p = .024). High TIL-density correlated with programmed death-ligand 1 expression levels ≥50% (p < .001). Multivariate analysis identified accumulation of TIL (p = .016) and low Treg density (p = .003) in TU as negative prognostic predictors in squamous cell carcinoma (p = .025), whereas M1-like tumor- associated macrophages (p = .019) and high programmed death-ligand 1 status (p = .038) were associated with better survival in adenocarcinoma., Conclusion: The assessment of specific intratumoral immune cells may serve as a prognostic predictor in pN1 NSCLC. However differences were observed related to adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma histology. Prospective assessment of the immune-cell infiltrate and further clarification of its prognostic relevance could assist patient selection for upcoming perioperative immunotherapies., Competing Interests: Disclosure Thomas Muley has received grants/contracts from Roche Diagnostics and Oncohost outside the submitted work. Petros Christopoulos has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda, speaker's honoraria from AstraZeneca, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Thermo Fisher, Takeda, support for attending meetings from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, and personal fees for participating to advisory boards from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, Takeda and Roche, all outside the submitted work. Hauke Winter has received received payment (lectures, presentations, speaker fee, manuscript writing, educational events) from MSD, AstraZeneca, Intuitive, Medtronic, Roche; expert testimony from Intuitive; support for attending meetings/travel from Roche, Intuitive, MSD and participation on Data Safety Monitoring/Advisory Board for AstraZeneca and Intuitive; all outside the submitted work. Florian Eichhorn, Andreas Weigert, Rajender Nandigama, Laura Klotz, Jochen Wilhelm, Mark Kriegsmann, Michael Allgäuer, Rajkumar Savai and Martin Eichhorn declare that they have no known conflict of interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In selected patients with early-stage malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), a multimodal therapy that includes surgical cytoreduction, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy is recommended. Several clinical trials have demonstrated the beneficial effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in pretreated MPM patients with advanced disease. Recent clinical data have suggested that the combination of chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibition might improve efficacy., Trial Design: The NICITA (nivolumab with chemotherapy in pleural mesothelioma after surgery) trial is a prospective, 1:1 randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04177953). Ninety-two patients with MPM epithelioid subtype, who had undergone extended pleurectomy and decortication with or without hyperthermic intrathoracic chemoperfusion, will be included to receive adjuvant treatment. All patients will receive ≤ 4 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy with pemetrexed (arms A and B). Patients in arm B will additionally receive nivolumab, together with the adjuvant chemotherapy, and subsequently for ≤ 12 cycles as maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint of this study is the time-to-next-treatment. The secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, proportion of patients with treatment beyond progression, duration of treatment beyond progression in this population, and quality of life., Conclusion: This prospective trial will contribute data to assess the efficacy of standard chemotherapy combined with nivolumab in the context of multimodal management of early-stage MPM. The study is currently enrolling patients., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)