1. Diagnostic Value of 18 F-FACBC PET/MRI in Brain Metastases.
- Author
-
Øen SK, Johannessen K, Pedersen LK, Berntsen EM, Totland JA, Johansen H, Bogsrud TV, Solheim TS, Karlberg A, and Eikenes L
- Subjects
- Humans, Positron-Emission Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Brain Neoplasms secondary, Cyclobutanes
- Abstract
Purpose: The study aims to evaluate whether combined 18 F-FACBC PET/MRI could provide additional diagnostic information compared with MRI alone in brain metastases., Patients and Methods: Eighteen patients with newly diagnosed or suspected recurrence of brain metastases received dynamic 18 F-FACBC PET/MRI. Lesion detection was evaluated on PET and MRI scans in 2 groups depending on prior stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS group) or not (no-SRS group). SUVs, time-activity curves, and volumetric analyses of the lesions were performed., Results: In the no-SRS group, 29/29 brain lesions were defined as "MRI positive." With PET, 19/29 lesions were detected and had high tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) (D max MR , ≥7 mm; SUV max , 1.2-8.4; TBR, 3.9-25.9), whereas 10/29 lesions were undetected (D max MR , ≤8 mm; SUV max , 0.3-1.2; TBR, 1.0-2.7). In the SRS group, 4/6 lesions were defined as "MRI positive," whereas 2/6 lesions were defined as "MRI negative" indicative of radiation necrosis. All 6 lesions were detected with PET (D max MR , ≥15 mm; SUV max , 1.4-4.2; TBR, 3.6-12.6). PET volumes correlated and were comparable in size with contrast-enhanced MRI volumes but were only partially congruent (mean DSC, 0.66). All time-activity curves had an early peak, followed by a plateau or a decreasing slope., Conclusions: 18 F-FACBC PET demonstrated uptake in brain metastases from cancer of different origins (lung, gastrointestinal tract, breast, thyroid, and malignant melanoma). However, 18 F-FACBC PET/MRI did not improve detection of brain metastases compared with MRI but might detect tumor tissue beyond contrast enhancement on MRI. 18 F-FACBC PET should be further evaluated in recurrent brain metastases., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. The work was supported by Trond Mohn Foundation., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF