Search

Assessment of the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP), together with the patient's nutritional status is crucial in the decision making process that determines the need for artificial nutrition. Both should be done on admission and at frequent intervals thereafter. The indication for nutritional support in AP is actual or anticipated inadequate oral intake for 5-7 days. This period may be shorter in those with pre-existing malnutrition. Substrate metabolism in severe AP is similar to that in severe sepsis or trauma. Parenteral amino acids, glucose and lipid infusion do not affect pancreatic secretion and function. If lipids are administered, serum triglycerides must be monitored regularly. The use of intravenous lipids as part of parenteral nutrition (PN) is safe and feasible when hypertriglyceridemia is avoided. PN is indicated only in those patients who are unable to tolerate targeted requirements by the enteral route. As rates of EN tolerance increase then volumes of PN should be decreased. When PN is administered, particular attention should be given to avoid overfeeding. When PN is indicated, a parenteral glutamine supplementation should be considered. In chronic pancreatitis PN may, on rare occasions, be indicated in patients with gastric outlet obstruction secondary to duodenal stenosis or those with complex fistulation, and in occasional malnourished patients prior to surgery. © 2009 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism.

To identify patients at high-risk for post-operative infections, several methods have been proposed, including prognostic nutritional index (PNI), instant nutritional assessment (INA) and nutritional assessment (NA). Weight loss (WL) has also been related to post-operative morbidity. We have evaluated the prognostic ability of PNI, INA, NA and WL in a prospective study carried out in 94 patients affected by gastro-intestinal malignancy, who underwent major surgery. Post-operative infections occurred in 26 (27.7%) patients. PNI, INA and NA identified classes of patients with a progressive risk of septic complications. To determine the prognostic ability of PNI, INA, NA and WL, sensitivity, specificity, Youden index and predictive values were evaluated. All methods had a Youden index greater than one, with a positive predictive value ranging from 0.33 to 0.36. Since all the methods studied showed a similar predictive ability, it seems reasonable to identify the high-risk surgical patient by using weight loss in association with those nutritional parameters derived from routine hospital laboratory tests.