Search

Panagiotis Kousiouris,1,&ast; Nikolaos Gouliopoulos,2,&ast; Anastasia Kourtesa,1,&ast; Georgios S Dimtsas,1 Klio Chatzistefanou,1 Nikolaos Bouratzis,2 Maria Kantzanou,3 Marilita M Moschos1 1 1st Department of Ophthalmology, University of Athens Medical School, G. Gennimatas Hospital, Athens, Greece; 2 2nd Department of Ophthalmology, University of Athens Medical School, Attikon Hospital, Athens, Greece; 3Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Marilita M Moschos, 1st Department of Ophthalmology, University of Athens Medical School, G. Gennimatas Hospital, 154 Leof. Mesogeion, Athens, 115 27, Greece, Tel +30 6944887319, Email moschosmarilita@yahoo.frPurpose: To present the demographic and social characteristics of patients with ocular foreign bodies (OFB), who visit the Ophthalmological Outpatient Department of a tertiary hospital in Athens, Greece.Patients and Methods: During the period January-March 2019, 5181 patients presented to the Ophthalmological Outpatient Department of our hospital, and 543 of them were diagnosed with an ocular foreign body. Moreover, 106 of them were interviewed about their demographic and social factors, regarding among others data about their occupation, level of education, nationality, family, and insurance status.Results: The patients with ocular foreign bodies were significantly younger compared to the rest of the examined patients (49.5± 13.9 vs 56.3± 17 years, p< 0.001). Moreover, the ocular foreign bodies were more frequent in men compared to women (15.5% vs 5.0%, p< 0.001) and in non-Greek patients (23.7% vs 9.2%, p< 0.001). Regarding the social characteristics of the patients with ocular foreign bodies, we found that the majority of them were married, employed, insured, while their educational status was middle and high school. Furthermore, the vast majority of the patients practiced manual professions (73.1% of them).Conclusion: We documented that the introduction of an ocular foreign body is frequently encountered in the Outpatient Department of our tertiary hospital in Athens, Greece. We also demonstrated that these patients are younger, while they are more frequently men, of non-Greek origin, with an educational status of middle and high school, and their occupation is associated with manual labour.Keywords: ocular foreign body, ocular trauma, demographic characteristics, social characteristics

Panagiotis Kousiouris,1,&ast; Olga Klavdianou,1,&ast; Konstantinos AA Douglas,1 Nikolaos Gouliopoulos,2 Klio Chatzistefanou,1 Maria Kantzanou,3 Georgios S Dimtsas,1 Marilita M Moschos1 1 1st Department of Ophthalmology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “G. Gennimatas” General Hospital, Athens, Greece; 2 2nd Department of Ophthalmology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” General Hospital, Athens, Greece; 3Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Marilita M Moschos 1st Department of Ophthalmology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “G. Gennimatas” General Hospital, Leof. Mesogeion 154, Athens, 115 27, GreeceTel +30 6944887319Email moschosmarilita@yahoo.frAbstract: Globe injury is a serious worldwide public health issue frequently leading to permanent vision impairment. The plethora of different types of globe injuries is classified into categories, including open and closed globe injuries. Globe injury occurs mainly in the workplace and at home, affecting predominantly middle-aged working men. Socioeconomic status (SES) is defined by income level, educational attainment, and employment status. Low socioeconomic status has been associated with a higher incidence of globe injury and can be utilized to identify at-risk populations. For managing open and closed globe injuries, different strategies are applied and the implementation of adequate globe injury prevention measures is needed for reducing the occurrence of globe injury. The following article aims to provide an overview of globe injury characteristics and their correlation with socioeconomic status and to highlight the significance of considering SES as a variable in globe injury prevention.Keywords: eye injuries, occupational injuries, social class, educational status

Marilita M Moschos,1 Nikolaos S Gouliopoulos,1 Christos Kalogeropoulos2 1Laboratory of Electrophysiology, First Department of Ophthalmology, University of Athens, Athens, Greece; 2Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece Purpose: Uveitis is the inflammation of the uveal tract, which usually also affects the retina and vitreous humor. The electrophysiological examination is an objective ocular examination that includes the electroretinogram, visual evoked potentials, the electrooculogram, the multifocal electroretinogram, and multifocal visual evoked potentials. Our aim is to review the literature of the use of the electrophysiological examination in cases of uveitis. Methods: We performed a systematic search of the literature of published papers until October 2012 using the PubMed search engine. The key terms that were used were “uveitis,” “electrophysiological examination”, “electroretinogram”, “visual evoked potentials”, “electro-oculogram”, “multifocal electroretinogram”, and “multifocal visual evoked potentials” in multiple combinations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review concerning the assessment of electrophysiology in uveitis. Results: Our search of the literature demonstrated that the electrophysiological examination, mainly by means of electroretinogram, multifocal electroretinogram, and visual evoked potentials, is performed in several cases of uveitis for many purposes, including diagnosis and monitoring of disease progression and treatment efficacy. The electrophysiological examination is more useful in patients with multiple evanescent white dot syndrome, acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy, birdshot chorioretinopathy, Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease, Adamantiades–Behçet disease, ocular syphilis, and Fuchs heterochromic cyclitis. Conclusion: This review summarizes the use of the electrophysiological examination in uveitic patients and underlines its value as a useful tool in the objective assessment and the monitoring of the disease. Keywords: uveitis, ERG, mfERG, VEP