1. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: 8-year results
- Author
-
Roland Frankenberger, Norbert Krämer, and Christian Reinelt
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Molar ,Enamel paint ,business.industry ,Resin composite ,Composite number ,Clinical performance ,Dentistry ,Dental Caries ,Middle Aged ,Nanocomposites ,Young Adult ,stomatognathic system ,Private practice ,visual_art ,Drop out ,visual_art.visual_art_medium ,Humans ,Cusp (anatomy) ,Medicine ,Female ,Prospective Studies ,business ,General Dentistry - Abstract
In a controlled prospective split-mouth study, clinical behavior of two different resin composites in extended class II cavities was observed over 8 years. Thirty patients received 68 direct resin composite restorations (Solobond M/Grandio, Voco—n = 36; Syntac/Tetric Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent—n = 32) by one dentist in a private practice. Thirty-five percent of cavities revealed no enamel at the bottom of the proximal box, 48 % of cavities provided
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF